God sucks!

[Locutus]

< Sigh again >

It was in the news at the time it occurred.  I followed the story. 

It appears you suffer from Billy O' induced drain bammage. 

[Locutus]

BTW, that's further evidence that God sucks and his followers suck even more. 

[LOsborne]

.... and advance the position of this "Christian" website that homosexuals are ipso facto pedophiles.

Pssst... Locutus, did you know that Christians practice symbolic cannibalism? Really. They do. Look up the sacrament of "holy communion."

See. It all depends on how the subject is presented.

[me]

Ok here's another article on NAMBLA
http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/nambla.html

[LOsborne]

I'd have to see that somewhere other than on the ACLU page before I'd believe it though.  Sorry.

Will you believe the Washington Post?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A16839-2004Jun4?language=printer

[Locutus]

Pssst... Locutus, did you know that Christians practice symbolic cannibalism? Really. They do. Look up the sacrament of "holy communion."

See. It all depends on how the subject is presented.

Exactly.  They think that by chompin' on that lil' wafer every week that they're eating god. 

[Locutus]

Will you believe the Washington Post?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A16839-2004Jun4?language=printer

I told her she needs to stop listening to ole' Billy O'. 

[LOsborne]

Ok here's another article on NAMBLA
http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/nambla.html

The issue is not NAMBLA. The issue is constitutional rights. NAMBLA has them. So does the American Nazi Bund. That's just the way it is. Everybody has them, or nobody  has them!

[me]

Even the gay's want nothing to do with NAMBLA it would seem.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1794584/posts

[me]

Praying is legal sex with under aged kids isn't.

[LOsborne]

They think that by chompin' on that lil' wafer every week that they're eating god.

Personally, I've always found that a little hard to swallow!   

[Locutus]

Ok here's another article on NAMBLA
http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/nambla.html

From your own article:

Initially, NAMBLA won considerable support for its efforts from the gay left. Differential age of consent laws for homosexuals and heterosexuals were then (and continue to be) used to target gay sex in jurisdictions around the world, including ones in the United States. Equalization of age of consent laws has been a major part of the struggle for gay rights in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. Some libertarians rallied to this cause, as did such leading feminist writers as Pat Califia, Kate Millett, and Gayle Rubin.

That's what the ACLU was defending.  Gay sex shouldn't be the target.  Sex with children should be.  Please tell me you understand what's going on with the ACLU's involvement in this case. 

[Locutus]

Even the gay's want nothing to do with NAMBLA it would seem.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1794584/posts

Exactly, but from the above post, you can see that they've been targeted as a result of them. 

[LOsborne]

Praying is legal sex with under aged kids isn't.

<pounding head against the wall>

ACLU is not defending pedophilia. ACLU is disputing the penalty difference based on whether the child is a girl or a boy. Why are you not getting this?

[me]

Hum, I thought they were protecting them from being part of the suit in the death of that boy because the killers may have been influenced by materials from that organization.