Global Warming is Natural

[awol]

now i can't get the picture out of my head...

hunchbacked climatologists huddled around a low table in a dark room when (horns sound) henry busts in with a hound dog...

"drat!  we would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for..."

so i'm gonna ask the obvious question.

why would imperial troops want to slaughter jawas?

[Sandy Eggo]

But when you got people spreading propaganda intended to indicate that the Earth is going to end, just to speed up something that could wreck the economy....then that is a spin

What is being spread to wreck the economy?


The facts are that global warming is a problem and can be reduced if it's taken seriously and measures are taken, which won't hurt the economy at all.

[Henry Hawk]

What is being spread to wreck the economy?


The facts are that global warming is a problem and can be reduced if it's taken seriously and measures are taken, which won't hurt the economy at all.

and who is not taking it seriously.........this admin IS taking steps to help the ecology....He just is not ready to bow down to the UN and Kyoto and let them Tax our butts into oblivion....and force Industries to abide by their set of rules, that they are not willing to impose on everyone.

[Henry Hawk]

now i can't get the picture out of my head...

hunchbacked climatologists huddled around a low table in a dark room when (horns sound) henry busts in with a hound dog...

"drat!  we would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for..."

so i'm gonna ask the obvious question.

why would imperial troops want to slaughter jawas?

say what..

[Sandy Eggo]

and who is not taking it seriously.........this admin IS taking steps to help the ecology....He just is not ready to bow down to the UN and Kyoto and let them Tax our butts into oblivion....and force Industries to abide by their set of rules, that they are not willing to impose on everyone.

I beg to differ...here's an example of how serious Bush and Co. are taking it  :

Here's something else that's worth a read:

WASHINGTON - Two federal agencies are investigating whether the Bush administration tried to block government scientists from speaking freely about global warming and censor their research, a senator said Wednesday.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15519947/

[awol]

say what..

ok.  literal it is.  why would environmentalists want to destroy the economy?

[Henry Hawk]

Here's something else that's worth a read:

WASHINGTON - Two federal agencies are investigating whether the Bush administration tried to block government scientists from speaking freely about global warming and censor their research, a senator said Wednesday.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15519947/

the key word is "investigating".....that is all it takes to make headline news....what are the two "federal agencies"...it is hardball.

[Henry Hawk]

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm

Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide
Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?
By Timothy Ball

Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the only one trying to make people open up their eyes and see the truth. But few listen, despite the fact that I was the first Canadian Ph.D. in Climatology and I have an extensive background in climatology, especially the reconstruction of past climates and the impact of climate change on human history and the human condition. Few listen, even though I have a Ph.D, (Doctor of Science) from the University of London, England and was a climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. For some reason (actually for many), the World is not listening. Here is why.


Believe it or not, Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science. We are wasting time, energy and trillions of dollars while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with no scientific justification. For example, Environment Canada brags about spending $3.7 billion in the last five years dealing with climate change almost all on propaganda trying to defend an indefensible scientific position while at the same time closing weather stations and failing to meet legislated pollution targets.

As I stated in the the Thread's Topic....Global Warming is Natural....this is why I believe it to be so....

[Henry Hawk]

ok.  literal it is.  why would environmentalists want to destroy the economy?

because they are wacko's??...I don't know....makes you wonder....but, if they would stop and think things through....that is what would happen if they had their way....

[Gryphon]

how so?

I would think finding different kinds of energy, all that technology would be a big boom for the economy in the long run.

[Henry Hawk]

how so?

I would think finding different kinds of energy, all that technology would be a big boom for the economy in the long run.

I think you are right, it would, but taxing  and regulating the current industries into extinction is not a wise way to go....imo..

[Henry Hawk]

The IPCC summary issued a prediction for how much sea level would rise -- by 7 to 23 inches by 2100 -- a big drop from the 20 feet that former Vice President Al Gore warned about in "An Inconvenient Truth." Where's the scorn?.....oh I know, let's give him a "Nobel Peace Prize".....and heck, through in a Oscar while your at it!!!!...this whole thing it beggining to stink...the word "scam" keeps coming to mind...

[Henry Hawk]

The IPCC summary issued a prediction for how much sea level would rise -- by 7 to 23 inches by 2100 -- a big drop from the 20 feet that former Vice President Al Gore warned about in "An Inconvenient Truth." Where's the scorn?.....oh I know, let's give him a "Nobel Peace Prize".....and heck, through in a Oscar while your at it!!!!...this whole thing it beggining to stink...the word "scam" keeps coming to mind...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16960409/site/newsweek
Inconvenient Kyoto Truths

a good article by George Will.....if you interested..

[awol]

saw alot of opinions.  no new truths.

[Henry Hawk]

saw alot of opinions.  no new truths.

Only the first tenet is clearly true, and only in the sense that the Earth warmed about 0.7 degrees Celsius in the 20th century. We do not know the extent to which human activity caused this.