News:

This year - 2026 - is the Unknown Zone's 25th anniversary!

Come join in the festivities!

Main Menu

Democrats won't allow cimate scientist to testify with Gore

Started by Gardengirl, April 24, 2009, 11:19:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

me

Quote from: Exterminator on April 28, 2009, 10:10:47 AM
Quote from: me on April 28, 2009, 10:05:29 AM
Yep, now that we're having cold winters they're saying it's caused by global warming just like they were saying the hot summers were caused by global cooling...... :biggrin:

It must really be peaceful to be so dumb.
Why don't you tell us how peaceful it is Ex seems like you should know.
Trump 2020

Exterminator

Quote from: me on April 28, 2009, 10:12:10 AM
Quote from: Exterminator on April 28, 2009, 10:10:47 AM
Quote from: me on April 28, 2009, 10:05:29 AM
Yep, now that we're having cold winters they're saying it's caused by global warming just like they were saying the hot summers were caused by global cooling...... :biggrin:

It must really be peaceful to be so dumb.
Why don't you tell us how peaceful it is Ex seems like you should know.

Such wit!   :rolleyes:
Arguing with Christians is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, shit on the board and strut around like it's victorious.

The truth is slow, but relentless. Over time it becomes irresistible.

me

Quote from: Exterminator on April 28, 2009, 10:48:11 AM
Quote from: me on April 28, 2009, 10:12:10 AM
Quote from: Exterminator on April 28, 2009, 10:10:47 AM
Quote from: me on April 28, 2009, 10:05:29 AM
Yep, now that we're having cold winters they're saying it's caused by global warming just like they were saying the hot summers were caused by global cooling...... :biggrin:

It must really be peaceful to be so dumb.
Why don't you tell us how peaceful it is Ex seems like you should know.

Such wit!   :rolleyes:
You have such a wonderful vocabulary Ex.  I'm sooooo impressed...
Trump 2020

Exterminator

Again, why do you think I care what some old, worn-out Andertucky housewife thinks of me?
Arguing with Christians is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, shit on the board and strut around like it's victorious.

The truth is slow, but relentless. Over time it becomes irresistible.

me

Quote from: Exterminator on April 28, 2009, 11:05:09 AM
Again, why do you think I care what some old, worn-out Andertucky housewife thinks of me?
Yer so cute when yer upset.....  :toothless:
Trump 2020

Exterminator

Arguing with Christians is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, shit on the board and strut around like it's victorious.

The truth is slow, but relentless. Over time it becomes irresistible.

me

Trump 2020

Sandy Eggo

The fact that someone would base evidence of the entire phenomena of global warming on what's happening in their back yards (relatively speaking) shows that they know nothing about the subject.
Only after the last tree has been cut down. Only after the last river has been poisoned. Only after the last fish has been caught. Only then will you find that money cannot be eaten. - -Cree Indian Prophecy

"Women who strive to be equal to men lack ambitition" -- anonymous

Sandy Eggo

Only after the last tree has been cut down. Only after the last river has been poisoned. Only after the last fish has been caught. Only then will you find that money cannot be eaten. - -Cree Indian Prophecy

"Women who strive to be equal to men lack ambitition" -- anonymous

Exterminator

I'm still trying to figure out what a cimate scientist studies?   :biggrin:
Arguing with Christians is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, shit on the board and strut around like it's victorious.

The truth is slow, but relentless. Over time it becomes irresistible.

Bo D

Quote from: Exterminator on April 28, 2009, 03:38:30 PM
I'm still trying to figure out what a cimate scientist studies?   :biggrin:

Cimates, of course.   duh!

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."  Carl Sagan

Exterminator

Arguing with Christians is like playing chess with a pigeon.  No matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, shit on the board and strut around like it's victorious.

The truth is slow, but relentless. Over time it becomes irresistible.

me

Quote from: Sandy Eggo on April 28, 2009, 03:24:15 PM
Oh and btw, who is "they"?
The scientists I guess.  Since that comment came from out in left field and both sides have referred to "they" in reference to findings about global warming.  I don't think Al Bore has gotten large enough to be referred to in the plural form yet.
Trump 2020

LOsborne

Quote from: me on April 28, 2009, 04:53:35 PM
Quote from: Sandy Eggo on April 28, 2009, 03:24:15 PM
Oh and btw, who is "they"?
The scientists I guess.  Since that comment came from out in left field and both sides have referred to "they" in reference to findings about global warming.
I reread the thread, just to test the truth of me's statement. Mcgonser used "they" in the second post of the thread, but it had a clear antecedent -- the "Democrats" in the title of the thread.

In the fifth post me used several "they"s with no antecedent I could find. I really don't think "cows" was the antecedent each time. Another floating "they" appears in post 18. In post 24 "they" appears to refer to the things which have been changed according to me. I think. It might be the scientists.

Post 40, Mcgonser uses "they" but it is unclear whether the antecedent is "enviormental orgs"(sic) or the aforementioned "Democrats." Possibly both, since "they" is used twice.

Post 43: me's "they" has no antecedent at all, and is simply indecipherable.

In post 52 I used "they" myself, but with the clear antecedent of "articles."

That brings us to this page, with Sandy's clever observation on the indefinite pronoun. And me's assertion that both sides have used it. Not so. Mcgonser and I used it, with clear antecedents (not totally clear once for Mcgonser, but at least there was a possible antecedent.)

Four times me used the indefinite pronoun "they" in phrases and sentences where there is no clue who "they" are.

This long, boring dissertation is to give warning: don't make statements that can be easily verified, unless you are sure you know what you are talking about. People do check.

me


Quote from: LOsborne on April 28, 2009, 07:40:41 PM
Quote from: me on April 28, 2009, 04:53:35 PM
Quote from: Sandy Eggo on April 28, 2009, 03:24:15 PM
Oh and btw, who is "they"?
The scientists I guess.  Since that comment came from out in left field and both sides have referred to "they" in reference to findings about global warming.
I reread the thread, just to test the truth of me's statement. Mcgonser used "they" in the second post of the thread, but it had a clear antecedent -- the "Democrats" in the title of the thread.

QuoteIn the fifth post me used several "they"s with no antecedent I could find. I really don't think "cows" was the antecedent each time. Another floating "they" appears in post 18. In post 24 "they" appears to refer to the things which have been changed according to me. I think. It might be the scientists.
That would be post #4 not 5:http://theunknownzone.us/smf/index.php?topic=13618.msg311651#msg311651 "they" is meaning scientists and the government.  If you had been aware of what was going on then you would have understood who was meant by "they".

Post #17 http://theunknownzone.us/smf/index.php?topic=13618.15
Since I was talking about scientists in the paragraph wouldn't if follow that that's what my "they" was referring to?

Post #23 http://theunknownzone.us/smf/index.php?topic=13618.msg311920#msg311920
If you can't figure out who and what is meant by "they" there then there is no hope for you at all.



QuotePost 40, Mcgonser uses "they" but it is unclear whether the antecedent is "enviormental orgs"(sic) or the aforementioned "Democrats." Possibly both, since "they" is used twice.
That would be post #39 http://theunknownzone.us/smf/index.php?topic=13618.msg311974#msg311974
Gee wonder who she meant by "they"
QuoteIsn't Gore backed by most of the enviormental orgs. Don't They have an agenda too?
[/b]

QuotePost 43: me's "they" has no antecedent at all, and is simply indecipherable.
That would be post #42 http://theunknownzone.us/smf/index.php?topic=13618.msg311988#msg311988
Hum, let me see...He mentioned liberal groups and then used the term they...hum, wonder who he was referring to..... :rolleyes:


In post 52 I used "they" myself, but with the clear antecedent of "articles."

Post #51 http://theunknownzone.us/smf/index.php?topic=13618.msg312039#msg312039


That brings us to this page, with Sandy's clever observation on the indefinite pronoun. And me's assertion that both sides have used it. Not so. Mcgonser and I used it, with clear antecedents (not totally clear once for Mcgonser, but at least there was a possible antecedent.)

Four times me used the indefinite pronoun "they" in phrases and sentences where there is no clue who "they" are.

This long, boring dissertation is to give warning: don't make statements that can be easily verified, unless you are sure you know what you are talking about. People do check.
^^ Back attcha^^
Trump 2020