Wake up America !!!
by Pam Geller
I am a student of history. Professionally, I have written 15 books in six languages, and have studied history all my life. I think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is just a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit crisis. Yes, these exist but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper focus.
Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about 10 - 15 years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two.
We demanded and then codified into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people whom we knew could never pay back? Why? We learned recently that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has "loaned" two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months,but will not tell us to whom or why or disclose the terms. That is our money. Yours and mine. And that is three times the $700B we all argued about so strenuously just this past September.
Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was a government of "We the People," who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not.
We have spent two or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy. Why?
We have intentionally dumbed down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer teach our founding documents, why we are exceptional, and why we are worth preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing, school boards continue to back mediocrity. Why?
We have now established the precedent of protesting every close election (now violently in California over a proposition that is so controversial that it wants marriage to remain between one man and one woman. Did you ever think such a thing possible just a decade ago?). We have corrupted our sacred political process by allowing unelected judges to write laws that radically change our way of life, and then mainstream Marxist groups like ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana republic. To what purpose?
Now our mortgage industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries are failing, our banking system is on the verge of collapse, Social Security is nearly bankrupt, as is Medicare and our entire government. Our education system is worse than a joke (I teach college and know precisely what I am talking about.) The list is staggering in its length, breadth, and depth. It is potentially 1929 x 10. And we are at war with an enemy we cannot name for fear of offending people of the same religion who cannot wait to slit the throats of your children if they have the opportunity to do so.
And now we have elected a man no one knows anything about, who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen, let alone a town as big as Wasilla , Alaska . All of his associations and alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment, and everything we learn about him, drip by drip, is unsettling if not downright scary(Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create and fund a mandatory civilian defense force stronger than our military for use inside our borders? No? Oh, of course. The media would never play that for you over and over and then demand he answer it.
Mr. Obama's winning platform can be boiled down to one word: Change...radical change. Why?
I have never been so afraid for my country and for my children as I am now. This man campaigned on bringing people together, something he has never, ever done in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along philosophical lines, push us apart, and then try to realign the pieces into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And when it comes, you will never see the same nation again.
And that is only the beginning.
I never thought that I would ever be able to experience what the ordinary, moral German felt in the mid-1930s. In those times, the savior was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they did know was that he was associated with groups that shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom they disagreed; he edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory and promises. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and waved a lot. And people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his "brown shirts" would bully them into submission.
And then he was duly elected to office, with a full-throttled economic crisis at hand [the Great Depression]. Slowly but surely he seized the controls of government power, department by department, person by person, bureaucracy by bureaucracy. The kids joined a Youth Movement in his name, where they were taught what to think. How did he get the people on his side? He did it promising jobs to the jobless, money to the moneyless, and goodies for the military-industrial complex. He did it by indoctrinating the children, advocating gun control, health care for all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once again in the country, across Europe , and across the world.
He did it with a compliant media - Did you know that? And he did this all in the name of justice and...change. And the people surely got what they voted for. (Look it up if you think I am exaggerating.) Read your history books. Many people objected in 1933 and were shouted down, called names, laughed at, and made fun of. When Winston Churchill pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister), he was booed into his seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though.
Don't forget that Germany was the most educated, cultured country in Europe . It was full of music, art, museums, hospitals, laboratories, and universities. And in less than six years - a shorter time span than just two terms of the U. S. presidency - it was rounding up its own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors. All with the best of intentions, of course. The road to Hell is paved with them.
As a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence tell me (even if they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting to me from across the chasm of seven decades; or I can hope I am wrong, close my eyes, have another latte and ignore what is transpiring around me.
Some people scoff at me; others laugh or think I am foolish, naive, or both. Perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people in the eye and tell them exactly what I believe - and why I believe it. I pray I am wrong. But, I do not think I am.
About the author via Google...
Pamela "Atlas" Geller began her publishing career at The New York Daily News and subsequently took over operation of The New York Observer as Associate Publisher. She left The Observer after the birth of her fourth child, but remained involved in various projects including American Associates, Ben Gurion University and being Senior Vice-President Strategic Planning and Performance Evaluation at The Brandeis School.
After 9/11, Atlas had the veil of oblivion violently lifted from her consciousness and immersed herself in the education and understanding of geopolitics, Islam, terror, foreign affairs and imminent threats the mainstream media and the government wouldn't cover or discuss.
**************************************************************
Since many of you enjoy senior citizen status or will sometime in the not too distant future, I thought you might be interested in this information.
IN GOD WE TRUST
Everybody that is on this mailing list is either a senior citizen, is getting close, or knows somebody that is. Most of you know by now that the Senate version (at least) of the "stimulus" bill includes provisions for extensive rationing of health care for senior citizens. The author of this part of the bill, former senator and tax evader, Tom Daschle, was credited today by Bloomberg with the following statement.
Bloomberg: "Daschle says health-care reform will not be pain free. Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them."
If this does not sufficiently raise your ire, just remember that Senators and Congressmen have their own healthcare plan that is first dollar or very low co-pay which they are guaranteed the remainder of their lives and are not subject to this new law if it passes.
Please use the power of the Internet to get this message out. Talk it up at the grassroots level. We have an election coming up in one year and nine months. We have the ability to address and reverse the dangerous direction the Obama administration and its allies have begun and in the interim, we can make our voices heard! Let's do it!
If you disagree, don't do anything.
Pam Geller is a dumb, racist bitch. The world will be a better place when she and anyone who follows the bile she spreads are dead.
Quote from: Exterminator on June 26, 2009, 07:43:17 AM
Pam Geller is a dumb, racist bitch. The world will be a better place when she and anyone who follows the bile she spreads are dead.
who pissed in YOUR wheaties this morning?....
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 26, 2009, 07:45:18 AM
who pissed in YOUR wheaties this morning?....
Do you know who she is?
Quote from: Exterminator on June 26, 2009, 07:53:54 AM
Do you know who she is?
don't know and don't care..... :no:........but I certainly don't wish she would die, because she MUST have something good going on, if she is irritating YOU... ;D
http://www.chasingevil.org/2008/08/pam-geller-goes-over-edge.html
A spokesperson for the Federal Elections Commission has released a statement that they received a complaint recently from Pamela Geller, author of the Atlas Shrugs website. In her complaint, she demanded that the FEC "stop" Barack Obama's presidential campaign - first, because the original US Constitution "did not allow for slaves to vote", therefore she believes that "any black man is ineligible to run for President and that any vote for himself or anyone else is invalid"
Still think Ms. Geller might have a valid point, Henry?
Quote from: LOsborne on June 26, 2009, 08:31:40 AM
http://www.chasingevil.org/2008/08/pam-geller-goes-over-edge.html
A spokesperson for the Federal Elections Commission has released a statement that they received a complaint recently from Pamela Geller, author of the Atlas Shrugs website. In her complaint, she demanded that the FEC “stop” Barack Obama’s presidential campaign - first, because the original US Constitution "did not allow for slaves to vote", therefore she believes that "any black man is ineligible to run for President and that any vote for himself or anyone else is invalid"
Still think Ms. Geller might have a valid point, Henry?
I never said she had a point in the first place..........I did NOT comment what-so-ever........she may be a skank...I have never heard of her before.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 26, 2009, 08:37:39 AM
I never said she had a point in the first place..........I did NOT comment what-so-ever........she may be a skank...I have never heard of her before.
Actually, you've commented three times in this thread. If you don't know who she is or anything about her, maybe it's best just to STFU?
Quote from: Exterminator on June 26, 2009, 08:44:37 AM
Actually, you've commented three times in this thread. If you don't know who she is or anything about her, maybe it's best just to STFU?
maybe, just maybe, you should kiss my ass?............how's that work for you?....again, I can care less, dipshit.....now it has been four time, that I have commented on here............
for those of you who are counting at home
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 26, 2009, 10:46:11 AM
maybe, just maybe, you should kiss my ass?............how's that work for you?....again, I can care less, dipshit.....now it has been four time, that I have commented on here............for those of you who are counting at home
Have it your own way but you've obviously never heard the old adage about it being better to keep your mouth shut and be thought an idiot than to open it and remove all doubt. Carry on...every village has one.
Quote from: Exterminator on June 26, 2009, 10:54:35 AM
Have it your own way but you've obviously never heard the old adage about it being better to keep your mouth shut and be thought an idiot than to open it and remove all doubt. Carry on...every village has one.
all i did in this thread was asked........"who pissed in YOUR wheaties this morning?...."...because you said that this woman
is a dumb, racist bitch.....
that is all.... :yes:.........it seems as if it was YOU, who might think about stfu.....or be a town idiot.... ;) :yes:
have a good weekend, Ex..... :)
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 26, 2009, 02:22:34 PM
all i did in this thread was asked........"who pissed in YOUR wheaties this morning?...."...because you said that this woman is a dumb, racist bitch.....
I said she's a dumb racist bitch because she is...doesn't require either piss or wheaties to recognize but when you chime in, it looks an awful lot like you're defending her.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 26, 2009, 02:22:34 PM
all i did in this thread was asked........"who pissed in YOUR wheaties this morning?...."...because you said that this woman is a dumb, racist bitch.....
Well, Henry, I should have thought it was fairly obvious that
Pam Geller pissed in his Wheaties. And mine. And those of every rational person who doesn't buy into her rabid, frothing-at-the-mouth hate-mongering. Looks to me like you were just too eager to try to score off Ex to perform the basic courtesy of learning what you were talking about, before jumping in gleefully with the hatchet.
You can call Ex rude, provoking, subjective, one-sided because he has at times exhibited all those characteristics (as have we all. ) But this time, at least, you can't call him wrong.
I am disappointed in you. I thought you had more integrity than to pull that banjo-country "if he's agin it, I'm fer it!" shit.
Anyone take exception to Mr. Daschle's comment about seniors should be more acception of conditions that go with old age and not treat them? I would like him to elaborate on that. Who doesn't get treated for what. I know that prostate cancer doesn't get treated if you are over 80 and on medicare.
Quote from: Anne on June 27, 2009, 11:48:33 PM
Anyone take exception to Mr. Daschle's comment about seniors should be more acception of conditions that go with old age and not treat them? I would like him to elaborate on that. Who doesn't get treated for what. I know that prostate cancer doesn't get treated if you are over 80 and on medicare.
My father was treated, successfully, at the age of 86. On medicare.
We have a good friend who is over 80 and was told that medicare would not pay to treat his prostate cancer so he had to pay for the treatment himself. Don't know what the difference would be between the two cases.
But, again, what exactly did Mr. Daschle mean by his statement?
Quote from: Anne on June 27, 2009, 11:48:33 PM
Anyone take exception to Mr. Daschle's comment about seniors should be more acception of conditions that go with old age and not treat them?
Perhaps he meant that those who will not accept the fact that they won't look 25 years old forever, are going to end up looking like Michael Jackson. (Or like he did last week. I haven't seen any photos of the corpse.) And having the same bank balance.
Maybe, but it sounds to me more like if you are old don't expect treatment for serious illness that are not guaranteed to completely cure you. We shall see.
I take it to mean after a certain age it isn't cost efficient to treat any illness so you're SOL and sorry 'bout your bad luck.
Yeah...too bad there aren't many 'productive citizens' in old age. I guess they just figure they are breathing air that is necessary for younger healthier people. Sucks. The elderly are the best teachers.
Quote from: LOsborne on June 26, 2009, 06:39:49 PM
Well, Henry, I should have thought it was fairly obvious that Pam Geller pissed in his Wheaties. And mine. And those of every rational person who doesn't buy into her rabid, frothing-at-the-mouth hate-mongering. Looks to me like you were just too eager to try to score off Ex to perform the basic courtesy of learning what you were talking about, before jumping in gleefully with the hatchet.
You can call Ex rude, provoking, subjective, one-sided because he has at times exhibited all those characteristics (as have we all. ) But this time, at least, you can't call him wrong.
I am disappointed in you. I thought you had more integrity than to pull that banjo-country "if he's agin it, I'm fer it!" shit.
I will tell you this, I do not know much about this Pamela Geller, but, much of what she had or has to say, I have no problem with......my point IS, that is seemed like it was okay, when Michael Moore made movies and books, with many, many proven lies and his whole movie was scripted and edited to cast a very negative view of Bush, but this girl, has NOT even come close to Moores level of scum...and she is a bitch?
LOsborne, I most certainly CAN and WILL call EX wrong....but, the bottom line is, it don't mean a hill of beans....Ex has his opinion, that most time, I will disagree with him, and He almost always will disagree with me....THAT is the way we work.....and I'm not too concerned if I DISAPPOINT you because YOU think I lack INTEGRITY.....I am extremely proud of my stances, that I take on here, and I will NOT bow down, to those who disagree with me or my point of views..........first of all, I am here to have fun and I know, I am NOT going to change EX's opinion or anybody else's on here, nor will anybody on here change mine, just because, they think that THEY have all the answers.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 29, 2009, 08:05:08 AM
I will tell you this, I do not know much about this Pamela Geller, but, much of what she had or has to say, I have no problem with...
You've been told enough about her in this very thread to be able to form an opinion and you continue to defend her. Any chance you ever had of convincing anyone you're not a racist bigot just left the building permanently.
Quote...my point IS, that is seemed like it was okay, when Michael Moore made movies and books, with many, many proven lies and his whole movie was scripted and edited to cast a very negative view of Bush, but this girl, has NOT even come close to Moores level of scum...and she is a bitch?
Oh, here we go again. Every time you bring this crap up and are asked to substantiate your claims that his information was lies, you get your ass handed to you on a platter but feel free to offer your proof (again) so that you can be made a fool. Was it scripted to make a specific point? Yes. Was it factually incorrect? No.
QuoteLOsborne, I most certainly CAN and WILL call EX wrong....but, the bottom line is, it don't mean a hill of beans...
Correct, because it is only the opinion of someone who isn't well informed.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 29, 2009, 08:05:08 AM
my point IS, that is seemed like it was okay, when Michael Moore made movies and books, with many, many proven lies and his whole movie was scripted and edited to cast a very negative view of Bush, but this girl, has NOT even come close to Moores level of scum...and she is a bitch?
Straw Man. No one has so much as mentioned Moore's name. Except you, of course.
Quote from: Exterminator on June 29, 2009, 08:14:37 AM
You've been told enough about her in this very thread to be able to form an opinion and you continue to defend her. Ant chance you ever had of convuncing anyone you're not a racist bigot just left the building permanently.
First of all, I would never try to
convunc ANYONE.......of anything................and I'm not even sure what convunc IS?
and I'm confident, that I am NOT a raciest bigot, not even by a long shot.....and trying to convuc YOU that I am not, is NOT a priority of mine... ;) :no: :razz:
Quote from: LOsborne on June 29, 2009, 08:20:19 AM
Straw Man. No one has so much as mentioned Moore's name. Except you, of course.
so that makes me a 'staw man'... :confused: :rolleyes:......I really don't CARE if I play by these asinine rules that many of you seem to think HAVE to be followed......I am HERE to express MY opinion.....and Moore seemed VERY appropriate to the attack of Gellar....my comparison is pertinent to this discussion.
Okay, since you declare it appropriate, I will claim that since you approve of Pam Gellar's stance on many items, you must also be a devout follower of Father Feeney. How far out in left field do you want to go?
P.S. the "straw man" was in reference to the fallacious argument, not to you. Look it up.
Quote from: LOsborne on June 29, 2009, 08:33:34 AM
Okay, since you declare it appropriate, I will claim that since you approve of Pam Gellar's stance on many items, you must also be a devout follower of Father Feeney. How far out in left field do you want to go?
P.S. the "straw man" was in reference to the fallacious argument, not to you. Look it up.
I understand the straw man argument.........and I don't know squat about any father feeney, but, the original story that was posted here by Gellar, I have NO problem with...there is some in that story I agree with, and THAT is what this thread was supposed to be about.......Ex called her a raciest BITCH....and based upon THAT story, I saw NOTHING to get all bitchy about.........Hell, you can find quotes and stories about almost anybody, to make them bitch if you wanted to.
My thoughts was pertaining to the original story....that is it.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 29, 2009, 08:23:35 AM
First of all, I would never try to convunc ANYONE.......of anything................and I'm not even sure what convunc IS?
and I'm confident, that I am NOT a raciest bigot, not even by a long shot.....and trying to convuc YOU that I am not, is NOT a priority of mine... ;) :no: :razz:
If you're going to spend so much effort making fun with an obvious typo, you might want to make sure you haven't made any glaring errors yourself while doing so.
Quote from: Exterminator on June 29, 2009, 09:10:26 AM
If you're going to spend so much effort making fun with an obvious typo, you might want to make sure you haven't made any glaring errors yourself while doing so.
no worries....there was NO effort involved in making fun of you, it was ALL my pleasure.... ;D
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 29, 2009, 09:12:29 AM
no worries....there was NO effort involved in making fun of you, it was ALL my pleasure.... ;D
I'm sure most reading that were amused as well but not at my expense.
Quote from: Exterminator on June 29, 2009, 09:34:54 AM
I'm sure most reading that were amused as well but not at my expense.
keep telling yourself that... :rolleyes: :razz:
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 29, 2009, 09:37:48 AM
keep telling yourself that... :rolleyes: :razz:
Get your own material.
Quote from: Exterminator on June 29, 2009, 10:13:47 AM
Get your own material.
you lost; get over it!!........ :confused:............wait, I mean,.. :confused:..Go with that!...... :confused:.....
LOL......
You two crack me up. And when you caught that particular typo, you should have looked a little further down for a couple more typos. I had to read one sentence 3 times to make sure I was grasping the structure properly. :wink:
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 29, 2009, 08:23:35 AM
and I'm confident, that I am NOT a raciest bigot, not even by a long shot.....
Me too. I'm convinced you are not the
raciest anything, since doing something so daring and risqué as researching a subject or verifying a source is so foreign to your nature.
:police:
Quote from: LOsborne on June 29, 2009, 07:08:37 PM
Me too. I'm convinced you are not the raciest anything, since doing something so daring and risqué as researching a subject or verifying a source is so foreign to your nature.
whatever lo, you don't know squat about me..........i never claimed to know anything about the source other than, it is ALWAYS, the case where Ex, calls somebody a bitch, because they don't agree with him....I can careless about the author, maybe she is a bitch, but the initial post that started all of this, her comments was not bigoted, nor did I see anything that she said that was wrong....it was her opinion piece.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 30, 2009, 08:39:17 AM
wWhatever lo, you don't know squat about me..........i I never claimed to know anything about the source other than, it is ALWAYS, the case where Ex, calls somebody a bitch, because they don't agree with him....I can careless care less about the author, maybe she is a bitch, but the initial post that started all of this, her comments was were not bigoted, nor did I see anything that she said that was wrong....it was her opinion piece.
Trying to fix the punctuation and sentence structure is just far too much work... :rolleyes:
Now you see why I leave Henry alone. LOL
Quote from: pariann on June 30, 2009, 10:33:35 AM
Now you see why I leave Henry alone. LOL
Sorta hurts the old noggin; huh?
I've been reading it so long, I can understand what he's saying.
Remember, I've helped 6 kids through learning to write, and working on the 7th, I've seen it all before. LOL
Henry...you know I love ya, ya danged tree climbing peeper.
Please, allow me to reconstruct, lOsborne, it is of my deepest concern, that you do not comprehend fully, my innermost being. I would like to confess, that I never petitioned to comprehend anything about the source other than, it is ALWAYS, seems to be the case where Exterminator, refers to someone as a "bitch", if you will, because they do not concur with him....I can be concerned less about the composer, maybe she is a "bitch", but the original message that stilted all this, was that her analyses was not bigoted nor raciest, nor did I see anything that she said that was erroneous....it was her postulated material.
LOL.....stilted?
stilt·ed (stltd)
adj.
1. Stiffly or artificially formal; stiff.
2. Architecture Having some vertical length between the impost and the beginning of the curve. Used of an arch.
And I'm not so sure postulated was the word you wanted in this context:
pos·tu·late (psch-lt)
tr.v. pos·tu·lat·ed, pos·tu·lat·ing, pos·tu·lates
1. To make claim for; demand.
2. To assume or assert the truth, reality, or necessity of, especially as a basis of an argument.
3. To assume as a premise or axiom; take for granted. See Synonyms at presume.
n. (psch-lt, -lt)
1. Something assumed without proof as being self-evident or generally accepted, especially when used as a basis for an argument: "the postulate that there is little moral difference between the superpowers" (Henry A. Kissinger).
2. A fundamental element; a basic principle.
3. Mathematics An axiom.
4. A requirement; a prerequisite.
LMFAO! Nice try, Henry! :biggrin:
hey, me tryed my bestest..... :yes:
A thesaurus can be a useful tool ...... in the right hands.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 30, 2009, 11:09:36 AM
Please, allow me to reconstruct, lOsborne, it is of my deepest concern, that you do not comprehend fully, my innermost being. I would like to confess, that I never petitioned to comprehend anything about the source other than, it is ALWAYS, seems to be the case where Exterminator, refers to someone as a "bitch", if you will, because they do not concur with him....I can be concerned less about the composer, maybe she is a "bitch", but the original message that stilted all this, was that her analyses was not bigoted nor raciest, nor did I see anything that she said that was erroneous....it was her postulated material.
I am befogged and benumbed by the preceding analyses (sic).
Although, to be sure, it most assuredly was NOT the raciest (sic) post I have ever read -- even though the original author exposed her "postulated material."
Perhaps it would have been racier if she had exposed her posterior material instead.
;D
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 30, 2009, 11:09:36 AM
Although, to be sure, it most assuredly was NOT the raciest (sic) post I have ever read -- even though the original author exposed her "postulated material."
Perhaps it would have been racier if she had exposed her posterior material instead.
That is probably doable, for the proper ROI. I'll volunteer. Except I'm afraid if I did poor Henry would be reduced to gibbering incomprehensibly --
Oh Wait!! He's already done that! -- and then Pari, Ex, FTW and Bo would be stuck with the task of
Deconstructing Henry!
Postulated HAH! Who was the character in The Princess Bride who said, "you keep saying that word. I don't think it means what you think it means"?
Wait! Why would you "do poor Henry", and why would he agree to be done?
It's part of that "stick a meaningful fork in me -- I've been done" procedure.
Couldn't get the smile off his face with a belt sander.
Quote from: followsthewolf on July 01, 2009, 05:05:11 PM
It's part of that "stick a meaningful fork in me -- I've been done" procedure.
Couldn't get the smile off his face with a belt sander.
:biggrin:
So it is an elective procedure not covered by insurance!
Quote from: Palehorse on July 01, 2009, 12:15:59 PM
Wait! Why would you "do poor Henry", and why would he agree to be done?
Quote from: followsthewolf on July 01, 2009, 05:05:11 PM
It's part of that "stick a meaningful fork in me -- I've been done" procedure.
Hold it! If I do Henry, there isn't going to be any
fork sticking in me -- no matter how meaningful! You guys are too kinky for this simple farm girl. I was just looking for a chapter for my book. Or a little hush money. That works too.
As for why: why did Monica do Bill, Maria do Mark, Kay do Ike... and so forth. ROI, of course.
Quote from: LOsborne on July 01, 2009, 06:58:18 PM
. . .
As for why: why did Monica do Bill, Maria do Mark, Kay do Ike... and so forth. ROI, of course.
:think:
(Wonder what kind of ROI can be obtained by doing a chicken hawk?)
:thinking2:
I think I just threw up a little in my mouth.
Quote from: Palehorse on July 01, 2009, 08:30:50 PM
:think:
(Wonder what kind of ROI can be obtained by doing a chicken hawk?)
:thinking2:
Well I'm betting it's a good one if you happen to be a chicken. And I'll stop there, because my thought was a little too perverted for little old prudish Pari.
Quote from: pariann on July 02, 2009, 12:06:33 AM
Well I'm betting it's a good one if you happen to be a chicken. And I'll stop there, because my thought was a little too perverted for little old prudish Pari.
:eek:
Quote from: Palehorse on July 01, 2009, 08:30:50 PM
(Wonder what kind of ROI can be obtained by doing a chicken hawk?)
I thought maybe he would pay me
not to. Y'all make things too complicated.
Quote from: LOsborne on July 02, 2009, 07:42:36 AM
I thought maybe he would pay me not to. Y'all make things too complicated.
Like a wheelchair, headband, and samuri sword aren't complicated? :razz: :biggrin:
Not at all. If I added the pearls, it would be too complicated.
Regarding your new tag-line. Just who tricked you easy?
I'm not sure where to start........... :confused:
Quote from: LOsborne on July 02, 2009, 08:03:26 AM
. . .Regarding your new tag-line. Just who tricked you easy?
The reptilians. . .
Quote from: Palehorse on July 02, 2009, 08:26:11 AM
The reptilians. . .
The PPDC has a pamphlet telling how to recognize their most obvious ploys. (The scales and flickering tongue are a big tip-off.) Ya want I should send it to ya?
Quote from: LOsborne on July 02, 2009, 08:34:04 AM
The PPDC has a pamphlet telling how to recognize their most obvious ploys. (The scales and flickering tongue are a big tip-off.) Ya want I should send it to ya?
Yes please! :spooked:
They speak with forked tongues!
I think you should blame the Nordics. They are much more into trickery. They blend in!! :spooked:
Quote from: pariann on July 02, 2009, 08:46:21 AM
I think you should blame the Nordics.
Blame Canada!!!!
(http://adviking.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/blame_canada_1.jpg)
Is that where they are hiding?
O Canada!
Our home and native land!
True patriot love in all thy sons command.
With glowing hearts we see thee rise,
The True North strong and free!
From far and wide,
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
God keep our land glorious and free!
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
Looks like Helen Thomas is catching on to whats happening. Guess she's over the warm fuzzys for sure.
The Latest Politics, News & Election Videos
July 01, 2009
CBS, Helen Thomas Challenge Gibbs On "Controlled" Town Hall Meeting
CBS' Chip Reid and Helen Thomas double teamed Robert Gibbs today at the daily press briefing on the "tightly controlled" town hall meeting President Obama will hold on health care. Gibbs kept saying lets have this discussion AFTER the meeting. Helen Thomas accused the White House of "controlling the press." She said almost all White House/Obama events are "prepackaged." She accused the White House of not "having any answers."
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/07/01/cbs_helen_thomas_challenge_gibbs_on_controlled_town_hall_meeting.html