General Election 2016 - Trump v. Clinton

[The Troll]

Wonder if they have a Sarah Palin doll on sale too. 

  I know for one sure, I am not going to converse with ParkerDivine.      I have got to put my head back on straight after hearing all of her illogical and brainless bullshit.  WOW! What bullshit.   can she put out.      I am taking a vacation away from her for a while.   

[AbbyTC]

Wonder if they have a Sarah Palin doll on sale too. 

[parkerdivine]

  I know for one sure, I am not going to converse with ParkerDivine.      I have got to put my head back on straight after hearing all of her illogical and brainless bullshit.  WOW! What bullshit.   can she put out.      I am taking a vacation away from her for a while.   

Suits me fine, The Troll.  I prefer people who understand what is going on from an in depth research into the issues.  Neoliberals are the Clintons who called themselves the "New Democrats" and it's basically referred to as "Whyare we letting the republicans be the ONLY ones who get rich in office?"

It's okay, though.  Trying to discuss without bias and with an informed background is hard.  It's also rare.

[parkerdivine]

Wonder if they have a Sarah Palin doll on sale too. 

Maybe it's a voodoo doll.....would THAT be fun....

[Exterminator]

Trying to discuss without bias and with an informed background is hard.  It's also rare.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect   

[Henry Hawk]

Hannity sums it all up for me with this statement....
"It's a choice between Donald J. Trump, a candidate who says he'll drain the swamp in Washington and bring about real change, or Hillary Clinton, the most corrupt career politician who's ever run for this office." – Sean Hannity

[Locutus]

I can't wait to see that douchebag crying crocodile tears in the coming days.

[Exterminator]

I can't wait to see that douchebag crying crocodile tears in the coming days.

You mean Henry?   

[Locutus]

Although I differ with Hank politically, I don't think he's a douchebag. 

Sean Hannity, however, is definitely a douchebag.   

[Y]

I prefer people who understand what is going on from an in depth research into the issues.

Well that certainly lets you out!

  Neoliberals are the Clintons who called themselves the "New Democrats" and it's basically referred to as "Whyare we letting the republicans be the ONLY ones who get rich in office?"

Get a clue:  Neoliberalism

Neoliberalism (neo-liberalism)[1] refers primarily to the 20th century resurgence of 19th century ideas associated with laissez-faire economic liberalism.[2]:7 These include extensive economic liberalization policies such as privatization, fiscal austerity, deregulation, free trade, and reductions in government spending in order to enhance the role of the private sector in the economy.

Since you don't recognize that, it's Libertarianism.  Do you know who embraces it?  Obviously not the Democrats in general; the Repugs/CONservatives/Toilet Paper Party are the ones who have taken it to heart and use it as their guiding light. 

Trying to discuss without bias and with an informed background is hard.  It's also rare.

So rare that it's non-existent from you.

[Y]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect   

Ain't that the F'n truth!

[Y]

Hannity sums it all up for me with this statement....
"It's a choice between Donald J. Trump, a candidate who says he'll drain the swamp in Washington and bring about real change, or Hillary Clinton, the most corrupt career politician who's ever run for this office." – Sean Hannity

Hank, you know I like you, but that BS just shows how inherently stupid you are when it comes to things like politics etc..   

As I've continually pointed out, Drumpf - if he's elected - cannot "drain the swamp" as it's beyond the president's purview - just like practically everything else he's promised you willing, gullible, idiots. 

Drumpf doesn't even have the sense or education - or willingness to educate himself - to learn about the powers of the job he's asking you idjits to elect him to.

And once again, the Clintons are THE most investigated politicians in history and there has never either a conviction or evidence of any crimes.  That just makes you, Hannity, and all the rest of you RW/Toilet Paper Party who continue to spew that crap just plain liars.

If you want someone corrupt, you'd better take a look at Drumpf's history.

[Y]

No problem....please return the request from me to you.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/4425135/Barack-Obama-to-allow-anti-terror-rendition-to-continue.html

There's been no retraction of it I have heard of to date.

That's just like you to look for and use a link making an assumption and you run with it making assumptions of your own.

If you had any sense, you'd know a denial or a repudiation would not mean the Bush practice would stop. 

On the other hand, the lack of a denial or a repudiation does not mean the Bush practice was going to be continued.

Ergo, unless you have concrete evidence that proves to a reasonable person that Bush's practice of 'extreme rendition' has continued under Obama, you're just talking out your arse as usual.

[Y]

Ya' know, it's gotten to the point that it just pizzes me off when people complain about 'term limits' and 'draining the swamp' because both of those are directly in the hands of the voters every time a congress person runs for re-election...

...and yet the same people that are always complaining re-elect the same ole' same ole' every election and expect differing results.

Now what was that common definition of insanity? 

[Locutus]

One of my friends posted this very appropriate statement on Facebook:

This is the last thing I'm going to say regarding this whole election so if we're friends and you're still somehow undecided just give this a read. Tomorrow is Election Day. I know this election is difficult so I'm going to try and make the decision easier for you. If you hate both candidates, choose an issue that means something to you and vote for that.

Personally,
-I'm voting for the environment.
-I'm voting for our education system.
-I'm voting for women's reproductive rights.
-I'm voting for gun legislation reform.
-I'm voting for fair treatment of immigrants.
-I'm voting for LGBT rights.
-I'm voting for equality across the board.

...and these are just some reasons why I personally voted for our Democratic nominee. You don't have to like her guys, I sure don't, but she supports issues that affect every woman in our lives, every child in our lives, every immigrant in our lives, and every gay person in our lives. Most importantly she believes in climate change (scientific fact) and acknowledges it as an issue that affects everyone. The other candidate thinks it's a hoax and that alone is a huge red flag for me.

Ugh, Sandro "but I don't vote", "the whole thing is rigged", "I've got an askew, cynical view of the world and hate the whole process". If you stay home and don't vote the things I listed above are just some of the issues at stake in this election. The next President is going to appoint Supreme Court judges. Their decisions are felt across the country. Don't be one of the people that say "voting doesn't affect me so who cares". It does, I promise you in some way, shape or form the choices you're letting other people make for you will affect you and your loved ones. That's a fact.

To my friends that are disillusioned with the Democratic Party and want to vote third party. I feel your pain but this is not an election you want to gamble on. Trump stands against a lot of the causes you guys support. Everything I listed above is in danger of being reversed or have their budget slashed under a Trump presidency. There is a time and place for action and I will be by you all when that time comes, but this is not the way or time to go about it. Vote Blue now and let's work these next four years to build up support for your third party nominees and parties. You can't expect the presidency if you're just throwing Hail Mary's every 4 years. Let's do this right.

Anyways, that's all I got to say.

Oh I lied!
FLORIDA:
NO on Amendment 1
YES on Amendment 2

Now that's it. Later.