F3-F5 Long Track Tornadoes

[Henry Hawk]

No. I made a statement and you took it personally, as usual.

You are the one who places this ship into peril on a daily basis. You spin and twist things in order to create an environment of chaos.

You take a topic related to a current event and make it a personal tragedy.

There's nothing wrong with disagreeing with a view or position, but when you use opinion in an attempt to discredit scientific fact you aren't doing anything to bolster your credibility. . .

You made it personal with the comment "You can slough that off if you want to; after all it is your life." 

It is NOT scientific FACT that "we" are causing this recent BAD weather to happen.....THAT is all I am saying.  You have NO PROOF that it is, but you continue to make comments referring that it is.

You know, let's just go back to NOT exchanging with one another.....It seems to work better that way.

I am here to have fun, and as Locutus referrs it to as a coffee shop with friends hanging out..........I will make my comments as I please, and IF you think my crediblity is bolstered then so be it.

You know the kind of guy I am PH.....I would give you the shirt off of my back if you needed it.

[RC]

This just shows you better be ready to meet your maker.  When a EF what ever appears on your door, there may not be time to repent.

[Palehorse]

This just shows you better be ready to meet your maker.  When a EF what ever appears on your door, there may not be time to repent.

Go preach somewhere else hypocrite.

[Palehorse]

You made it personal with the comment "You can slough that off if you want to; after all it is your life." 

It is NOT scientific FACT that "we" are causing this recent BAD weather to happen.....THAT is all I am saying.  You have NO PROOF that it is, but you continue to make comments referring that it is.

. . .

Again, a general statement that YOU chose to take personally. That makes it your problem and not mine. Out of the entire post you focused on one sentence. (Technically, half a sentence until the post above which I am quoting).

It's not scientific fact? Really? You go with that.

The only reason you hold that position is that you read pseudo scientific blogs by the likes of Goldman and because of people like him the facts become obscured by the bullshit they spew; which you apparently prefer because they feed your skewed world views.

Moreover, now you are taking a topic about F3-F5 Long Track Tornadoes off into the deep weeds by trying to take the topic into global warming. WHERE in this topic have I said anything that could be construed as being on the subject of global warming? YOU are trying to take it there.

Once again we see indications that you cannot multi-task and keep topics on different things separate. 

[Henry Hawk]

 

[Henry Hawk]

Again, a general statement that YOU chose to take personally. That makes it your problem and not mine. Out of the entire post you focused on one sentence. (Technically, half a sentence until the post above which I am quoting).

It's not scientific fact? Really? You go with that.

The only reason you hold that position is that you read pseudo scientific blogs by the likes of Goldman and because of people like him the facts become obscured by the bullshit they spew; which you apparently prefer because they feed your skewed world views.

Moreover, now you are taking a topic about F3-F5 Long Track Tornadoes off into the deep weeds by trying to take the topic into global warming. WHERE in this topic have I said anything that could be construed as being on the subject of global warming? YOU are trying to take it there.

Once again we see indications that you cannot multi-task and keep topics on different things separate. 

I want to reiterate one thing.  I pointed out the FACT the Indianapolis had ONE EF3 or higher tornado since 1972, and YOUR list had Indianapolis on the list as the city with the fourth highest risk.  I just found your source to not make any sense.  I didn't slam it, or you.  Just made an observation based on fact.  OPENED it up for a civil discussion.

I didn't attack in any way, shape or form.

Secondly, I have never heard of Goldman before. I have based my opinion of other scientists views on Global Warming.  Not because they fit MY "skewed" opinion......but, because it makes MORE sense.
I have a strong distrust in the political agenda that has risen from the scientific world concering GW.  Al Gore being ONE as an example, that set the tone for me.
Thirdly,
I didn't KNOW it was RULE that we could not talk about other topics inside another topic....it seemed approriate to me to say what I did.  I certainly didn't mean to ruffle any feathers. 

Just tryin have some fun....I'm not going to get all wrapped up in emotion ever again.

[Exterminator]

I have based my opinion of other scientists views on Global Warming.  Not because they fit MY "skewed" opinion......but, because it makes MORE sense.

In the same way it makes more sense to see a neurologist about heart problems?

[Palehorse]

I want to reiterate one thing.  I pointed out the FACT the Indianapolis had ONE EF3 or higher tornado since 1972, and YOUR list had Indianapolis on the list as the city with the fourth highest risk.  I just found your source to not make any sense.  I didn't slam it, or you.  Just made an observation based on fact.  OPENED it up for a civil discussion.

I didn't attack in any way, shape or form.

Secondly, I have never heard of Goldman before. I have based my opinion of other scientists views on Global Warming.  Not because they fit MY "skewed" opinion......but, because it makes MORE sense.
I have a strong distrust in the political agenda that has risen from the scientific world concering GW.  Al Gore being ONE as an example, that set the tone for me.
Thirdly,
I didn't KNOW it was RULE that we could not talk about other topics inside another topic....it seemed approriate to me to say what I did.  I certainly didn't mean to ruffle any feathers. 

Just tryin have some fun....I'm not going to get all wrapped up in emotion ever again.

My mistake. I meant Steven Goddard the self proclaimed climatologist.

Thes rest of this is blah, blah, blah.

[Palehorse]

By the way, have you found it yet Henry?

[Henry Hawk]

found what?
I'm not looking for anything.

The only thing I DID do was point out the INDIANAPOLIS has had only ONE tornado bigger than an EF4 since 1972.......and whas wondering WHY your list had INDIANAPOLIS a big risk city.

That's it, nothing more, nothingless.

[Palehorse]

found what?
. . .

What I had for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.