Government shut down March 1 ?

[Palehorse]

. . . My behavior has only matched up with my opponent.  When shit is thrown my way, I throw it back.

And this reactionary behavior has become the norm instead of the exception. . .

[Exterminator]

Why do lyrics from Pink Floyd's Happiest Days Of Our Lives suddenly come to mind?

[Palehorse]

Why do lyrics from Pink Floyd's Happiest Days Of Our Lives suddenly come to mind?

[me]

Lots of people could have done the WH tour on what it cost the tax payers for this little trip.  Of course you all will excuse it as usual and ignore the fact that it was scrubbed from the media. 

snopes.com    
   
Malia Obama in Mexico
Claim:   Malia Obama traveled to Mexico in March 2012.

   TRUE

Example:   [Collected via e-mail, March 2012]

Did Malia Obama go to Mexico City on Spring break?



Origins:   In March 2012, thirteen-year-old Malia Obama, the daughter of President Obama, traveled to Oaxaca, Mexico, on what was described in the press as both a "school trip" and a "spring break vacation":
After weighing the risks of traveling to Mexico, the parents of one American teenager decided to allow her to join a school trip to Oaxaca, where students volunteered at an orphanage, visited archaeological sites and sipped vanilla milkshakes on the honey-colored town plaza.

The fact that the parents were President Obama and the first lady, Michelle Obama, and that the teenager was their daughter Malia, thrilled Mexican tourism officials, who are trying to redefine the country's image as it has struggled with drug violence.
What would seem to be a rather mundane bit of news about a presidential family member became an item of interest when readers noticed that information about Malia's trip had apparently disappeared from a number of online news sites. As Politico reported on 20 March 2012, this redaction of information came at the behest of the White House:
The AFP, the Huffington Post and other websites have scrubbed a report about first daughter Malia Obama's school trip.

On [19 March 2012], the AFP reported that Obama's daughter was on a school trip along with a number of friends and 25 Secret Service agents. The story was picked up by Yahoo, the Huffington Post, and the International Business Times, as well as UK publications like the Daily Mail and the Telegraph and other overseas publications like The Australian.

But [by that] night, the story had been removed from those sites. The AFP page for the story now links to a story titled "Senegal music star Youssou Ndour hits campaign trail," as does the Yahoo page. The Huffington Post page now links directly back to the Huffington Post homepage. The Daily Mail, Telegraph, and Australian stories now lead to 404 error pages, reading "page not found." The International Business Times story also links to the IBT homepage, though a version of the original story still exists online.

Kristina Schake, Communications Director to the First Lady, emailed to confirm this was a White House effort:

    From the beginning of the administration, the White House has asked news outlets not to report on or photograph the Obama children when they are not with their parents and there is no vital news interest. We have reminded outlets of this request in order to protect the privacy and security of these girls.

Then, as BuzzFeed noted, even that Politico item was subsequently altered to remove some details, also at the behest of the White House:
The White House's campaign to scrub a story from the internet yesterday about Malia Obama's trip to Mexico has gone meta: a media reporter's blog post about the administration's efforts to scrub the story has now been scrubbed of certain details, Politico confirmed.

The item, by Politico's Dylan Byers, originally noted that news sites were removing the Malia story.

Then the post was updated with comment from the White House confirming that it was involved with efforts to remove the story — but the Politico post itself was now missing information about the trip. Specifically, the current version of the story makes no reference to where the president's daughter is going: Mexico, which can also be found by Googling Obama's daughter's name and "trip."

Rachel Smolkin, Politico's White House editor, confirmed that they removed the information after talking to the Obama administration, citing safety concerns.

"After some internal discussions and conversations with the White House, we adjusted the post for security reasons," Smolkin told BuzzFeed.
According to the New York Times:
Although the White House asked English-language media to remove articles about the visit from their Web sites, the visit was never a secret in Mexico. "The reality is that Oaxaca isn't that big and it isn't that easy to hide 10 girls and that security," said Mr. Zorrilla, the tourism official.
Last updated:   28 March 2012

Urban Legends Reference Pages © 1995-2013 by Barbara and David P. Mikkelson.
This material may not be reproduced without permission.
snopes and the snopes.com logo are registered service marks of snopes.com.

   


Sharing Successful!
Share again!

You've successfully shared using Po.st!
Welcome to po.st!
Powered by Po.stPrivacy
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/maliamexico.asp#lXzKSPfTs2CKsswT.99

[Palehorse]

More whining. . . Sheesh. 

[me]

More whining. . . Sheesh. 

And that isn't an "in your face" thing?  BS....Your kids can't visit the WH on spring break but mine is going to Mexico on your dollar.  What a guy.

[Palehorse]

And that isn't an "in your face" thing?  BS....Your kids can't visit the WH on spring break but mine is going to Mexico on your dollar.  What a guy.

Hypocrite much?

One moment you want to eradicate everything from WH stationary and stamps, to the ply of toilet paper they use there. Then you want to squall when they make the cuts. . .   

[me]

Hypocrite much?

One moment you want to eradicate everything from WH stationary and stamps, to the ply of toilet paper they use there. Then you want to squall when they make the cuts. . .   

You just don't get it do you? 

[Palehorse]

You just don't get it do you?

Oh, I get it alright. Triple K isn't hard to spot.

[me]

Oh, I get it alright. Triple K isn't hard to spot.

Will you come down off that sorry BS.  It has nothing to do with color what is going on is wrong on a lot of lvl's and you know it. 

[Palehorse]

Will you come down off that sorry BS.  It has nothing to do with color what is going on is wrong on a lot of lvl's and you know it.

Ignorance of overall intention and purpose is not an excuse for this flagrant violation of the law. When you support those with nefarious intention then you are guilty by proxy.

[Exterminator]

Ignorance of overall intention and purpose is not an excuse for this flagrant violation of the law. When you support those with nefarious intention then you are guilty by proxy.

Nicely said!

[me]

Ignorance of overall intention and purpose is not an excuse for this flagrant violation of the law. When you support those with nefarious intention then you are guilty by proxy.

Exactly what law did I violate by posting about Obama's daughter traveling to Mexico on spring break at the tax payers expense when the WH has been closed to the public because of lack of funds.  Do you realize how many tours that little "vacation" could have paid for? That is beyond the pale and as in your face as anything. It was even pulled from news sources trying to keep people from finding out about it and that in itself should tell you something.

[Palehorse]

Exactly what law did I violate by posting about Obama's daughter traveling to Mexico on spring break at the tax payers expense when the WH has been closed to the public because of lack of funds.  Do you realize how many tours that little "vacation" could have paid for? That is beyond the pale and as in your face as anything. It was even pulled from news sources trying to keep people from finding out about it and that in itself should tell you something.

Crank up the volume.
http://www.youtube.com/v/oUxyg_DFMfM

[me]

Crank up the volume.
http://www.youtube.com/v/oUxyg_DFMfM

When it becomes against the law to disagree with the POTUS or something he does it's over.  Has it really come to that point?