CONGRESS Sucks! (Hypocrites)

[Henry Hawk]

  Andrew Breitbart now there is a creep who I think is a scum bag, a hatchet man.  See no color just black and white are you defending Breitbart now.  It sure sound like it to me

.  But then why not you still are defending George W. and Prick Cheney and the way they and the Republican Party ran the country for 8 years.  But then you voted for them twice.  What a Mooroon.

when was the last time I defended Bush?....I admit HE made mistakes (I still think he was better than the alternative).....do you just make shit up as you go?  What has breitbart done?  other than supply the media with facts?  something they rarely care about BEFORE they air a story...

[Henry Hawk]

okay, I am through... ........go ahead an defend this guy....Heck, elect him for your POTUS..... ......I can honestly care less..........I think we should TRY to keep a little integrity in our elected offices.. ...but, I guess you dems see it differently....and go ahead and trash breitbart too... ...

it is really pathetic.

[The Troll]

okay, I am through... ........go ahead an defend this guy....Heck, elect him for your POTUS..... ......I can honestly care less..........I think we should TRY to keep a little integrity in our elected offices.. ...but, I guess you dems see it differently....and go ahead and trash breitbart too... ...

it is really pathetic.

  If  you don't know Breitbart's history, then you're dumber than I thought.  

[Henry Hawk]

  If  you don't know Breitbart's history, then you're dumber than I thought.  

I know all about Breitbart..........he has been around for a long while now.....and again, he is probably more reliable than CBS, NBC and ABC put together.............he supports his news with facts....and video..........he has even place a sum of money for anyone to prove him wrong.

[The Troll]

I know all about Breitbart..........he has been around for a long while now.....and again, he is probably more reliable than CBS, NBC and ABC put together.............he supports his news with facts....and video..........he has even place a sum of money for anyone to prove him wrong.

  Does that mean taking words out of context and rearranging them to make a person appear a racist.  Is that the right thing to do.  Well, you precious little asshole lies.  It caused her to lose a job of a life time and you think he is alright.   

[Exterminator]

I know all about Breitbart..........he has been around for a long while now.....and again, he is probably more reliable than CBS, NBC and ABC put together.............he supports his news with facts....and video..........he has even place a sum of money for anyone to prove him wrong.

He's a liar, Henry.  Intentionally manipulating and editing something someone says to make it sound different from what he or she actually said is deceptive.  Have you no morals?

[Henry Hawk]

  Does that mean taking words out of context and rearranging them to make a person appear a racist.  Is that the right thing to do.  Well, you precious little asshole lies.  It caused her to lose a job of a life time and you think he is alright.   

Ex, just for arguments sake.....

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=180069

Dan Rather can outright lie to the nation, and no big deal.......Breitbart is a internet hack, who in hindsite brought more justice against ACORN and showed exactly the crooked crap that they do.....he is NOT a National TV Star.....and the pending lawsuit may be dropped here very soon, because he did not break the law.

Did he act immorally, ??? in his eyes he was not.............he admits he will be more careful on crossing his t's and dotting his i's from now on.

Troll all you watch is liberal news and you get the news you want that tickles your ear.................

[Exterminator]

Red herring...we're not talking about Dan Rather.

I find it interesting (and more than a little ironic), though, that you attempt to deflect the issue in a thread on hypocrisy.  While you decry Weiner's lack of morals, you defend someone who also has none much in the same way you express your self-righteous indignation about his actions when you made not a peep about Christopher Lee, a Republican congressman's having done essentially exactly the same thing.  Double standard much?

[The Troll]

Ex, just for arguments sake.....

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=180069

Dan Rather can outright lie to the nation, and no big deal.......Breitbart is a internet hack, who in hindsite brought more justice against ACORN and showed exactly the crooked crap that they do.....he is NOT a National TV Star.....and the pending lawsuit may be dropped here very soon, because he did not break the law.

Did he act immorally, ??? in his eyes he was not.............he admits he will be more careful on crossing his t's and dotting his i's from now on.

Troll all you watch is liberal news and you get the news you want that tickles your ear.................

  Henery where do you come up with this trash.  I just search the internet for the R M New Network (radio) and I can't find who own is.  Who runs it.  who is the CEO of it or the history of this radio station.  From reading some of the programs it seem a little loony.  I wonder why you would quote from it.   

[Henry Hawk]

Red herring...we're not talking about Dan Rather.

I find it interesting (and more than a little ironic), though, that you attempt to deflect the issue in a thread on hypocrisy.  While you decry Weiner's lack of morals, you defend someone who also has none much in the same way you express your self-righteous indignation about his actions when you made not a peep about Christopher Lee, a Republican congressman's having done essentially exactly the same thing.  Double standard much?

I never even HEARD of Christopher Lee....let alone defend him....so we are not comparing apples to apples here.......and I tell you the truth I can care less if they are dem or repub.......if they did what weeeener did......he should resign.

No double standard....I promise

[me]

I never even HEARD of Christopher Lee....let alone defend him....so we are not comparing apples to apples here.......and I tell you the truth I can care less if they are dem or repub.......if they did what weeeener did......he should resign.

No double standard....I promise

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/09/new-york-congressman-resigns-over-shirtless-photo/

Must be a New York thing.  A Dem congressman, Eric J. Massa, is mentioned in this story too as having resigned for groping a male aide.

[Palehorse]

I know all about Breitbart..........he has been around for a long while now.....and again, he is probably more reliable than CBS, NBC and ABC put together.............he supports his news with facts....and video..........he has even place a sum of money for anyone to prove him wrong.

Man, this post is so contradictory to your position up to this point, I hardly know what to say! 

B-bart intentionally trashes a government employee's career with outright lies that inflicted real harm, and somehow he maintains his credibility, and a member of congress sext's / posts pictures of himself, (inflicting no real harm outside of "what has been seen cannot be unseen") and he should be run out on a rail? How exactly does that process work?

Now, don't get me wrong. I'm not defending Weiner or what he did. As I stated earlier, the guy should resign in my opinion; however, my opinion does not represent the voice of the people and that should outweigh anyone's opinion. So, should he not resign and get re-elected, there you go. . .

What I AM questioning is the decision process you are using that overlooks an individual's act that actually inflicts real and measurable harm upon an individual! 

BOTH positions of the individuals we are talking about here (B-bart and Weiner) hold positions of "public trust", and both professions hold basic professional expectations surrounding that trust that have been clearly violated. One of which inflicted real and immediate harm upon an individual. . .

[Henry Hawk]

Man, this post is so contradictory to your position up to this point, I hardly know what to say! 

B-bart intentionally trashes a government employee's career with outright lies that inflicted real harm, and somehow he maintains his credibility, and a member of congress sext's / posts pictures of himself, (inflicting no real harm outside of "what has been seen cannot be unseen") and he should be run out on a rail? How exactly does that process work?

Now, don't get me wrong. I'm not defending Weiner or what he did. As I stated earlier, the guy should resign in my opinion; however, my opinion does not represent the voice of the people and that should outweigh anyone's opinion. So, should he not resign and get re-elected, there you go. . .

What I AM questioning is the decision process you are using that overlooks an individual's act that actually inflicts real and measurable harm upon an individual! 

BOTH positions of the individuals we are talking about here (B-bart and Weiner) hold positions of "public trust", and both professions hold basic professional expectations surrounding that trust that have been clearly violated. One of which inflicted real and immediate harm upon an individual. . .

Shirley Sherrod is not an innocent victim by any way shape or form......again, you guys are just getting the side that is out to try to shut Breitbart down.....
http://www.counterpunch.org/wilkins08022010.html
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/shirley-sherrod-vs-andrew-breitbart-who-will-win-in-court/question-1514905/
lets see how this comes out in court to decide WHO is guilty....

the bottom line is I don't trust liberals and this is an obvious smear on Breitbart...they don't like him because he blew the whistle on ACORN....it was the media who took the video's and overreacted and blew the situation out of proportion....THEN, THEY turned on Breitbart.....if ANYONE was being irresonsible it was the media.....NOT Breitbart.

[The Troll]

Shirley Sherrod is not an innocent victim by any way shape or form......again, you guys are just getting the side that is out to try to shut Breitbart down.....
http://www.counterpunch.org/wilkins08022010.html
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/shirley-sherrod-vs-andrew-breitbart-who-will-win-in-court/question-1514905/
lets see how this comes out in court to decide WHO is guilty....

the bottom line is I don't trust liberals and this is an obvious smear on Breitbart...they don't like him because he blew the whistle on ACORN....it was the media who took the video's and overreacted and blew the situation out of proportion....THEN, THEY turned on Breitbart.....if ANYONE was being irresonsible it was the media.....NOT Breitbart.

   This boy is really fu*ked up.  He wants Weiner's head for sending some off colored pictures and he wants to kiss the ass of Breitbart.  He wants to call Dan Rather a lier, who lost his job over saying the dumbass George W. went A.W.O.L from the Texas Air Guard.  Which he did and should have been activated and sent to Nam.  But daddy had to much pull and money.

  Breitbart, well he should get a job with GICO for this slime bag really lives under a rock like most snakes do.  Henry, you do need a brain transplant.   

[Exterminator]

What I AM questioning is the decision process you are using that overlooks an individual's act that actually inflicts real and measurable harm upon an individual!

Henry has situational ethics.  If the person in question supports his warped ideas or panders to the neocons, he/she can rape babies and Henry would excuse the behavior and blame the "main stream media" for smearing him/her.  If someone Henry doesn't agree with (thinking people, by and large) farts and doesn't say excuse me, he'd like them hanged.  Like I said, his comments are ironically fitting in a thread on hypocrisy...on many levels.