Objects of Benevolence...

[The Troll]

What they are calling critical thinking is nothing more than mumbo jumbo meant to confuse.  Clouding issues with unnecessary BS to prove a point that is mostly speculation on their part and on the part of the person they got their information from.  No matter if the proof is right in their faces they would rather believe a pie chart or some graph that drops a little info here and adds a little there to make the figures work and then they can tell you yours were wrong.  They never learned to look at the whole picture only choosing the parts that suited them and pushed their particular agenda.  They will never understand that the utopia that the current administration is pushing comes with a heavy price to pay and I'm not just referring to money.   
This pretty well sums up the monetary part of it though:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Maz9ddxEQnM

  The song sucks, I never knew a Beetle's song could sound so bad.  But with you "ME" there is a old saying, it goes.  There is none so blind as those who will not see."

  As far a Henry Hawk, I don't think there is anyone in the zone but you who would call Henry "Benevolent".  Since it is Christmas time I think we need to change Henry's name to "Scrooge Hawk".   There is no charity in his blood, except for the people he "claims" he personally helps.   Merry Christmas Scrooge. 

[me]

Congratulations, Henry, you just emphatically proved every point Y made about you with your use of that site as your reference point.  The real numbers are available directly from the government on their own websites if you'd care to actually engage in some real critical thinking and do some real research.  At least you put forth the extra effort to make yourself look even more foolish by lauding your insight and intelligence...trust me, Mensa material you are not.

Me, your blather is barely worth even responding to but suffice it to say that if intellect was were money, you wouldn't have two nickles to rub together.

There I fixed it for you.   

[Exterminator]

Congratulations, you took a gramatically correct sentence and made it incorrect.

[me]

Congratulations, you took a gramatically correct sentence and made it incorrect.

[Exterminator]

I'm just sayin'...

[me]

Guess that "if wishes were horses" is grammatically incorrect then huh?

[Exterminator]

The word "wishes" is plural; "intellect" is singular.

Seriously, this is pretty basic English, not rocket science.

[Sandy Eggo]

Seriously?

[followsthewolf]

Depends on the situation.

Either might be acceptable.

[Exterminator]

Huh?

[followsthewolf]

Subjunctive use.

Condition contrary to fact. (Use of "if.")

Informal use "was"; formal use "were."