Republican Party, Teabag Party and the Libertarian Party absolutely SUCK!

[me]

  did you or your girls or family use birth control, hysterectomy or tubes tied to keep from having to many babies or for health reasons.

  Your little cry baby Rick Santorum want to take all forms of birth away from woman.  You say that just one thing like this won't keep you from voting for him.       

I didn't hear him say that I heard him make a bad tasteless joke period.  Hysterectomies are not given as a form of birth control.

[The Troll]

I didn't hear him say that I heard him make a bad tasteless joke period.  Hysterectomies are not given as a form of birth control.

  All around the bush, no answer, as usual.  Do you agree with Santorum's stand on abortion and the elimination of birth control and his stance against woman civil rights to have and use them.  How simple is it to give an answer.

  Well why did you say that he just made a simple joke.  Were you lying then or now, it can't be both.  Either he was joking or he wasn't joking.  It's wether you agree or you don't.  Yea, on Nay. 

[Locutus]

I didn't hear him say that I heard him make a bad tasteless joke period.  Hysterectomies are not given as a form of birth control.

The remainder of that article regarding the committee hearings on contraception (sans women I might add) were anything but a joke.  What about those? 

[me]

That's still a silly thing to use as a basis on whether to vote for someone or not.  You all know darn well that may be his opinion about the issues but he cannot do anything that congress won't let him.  There are waaaaay more important issues on which to base whether you'd vote for someone or not.  Like Ron Paul and doing away with the military and all that stupid stuff he comes up with.  Would you, if he were a liberal, vote for him on that issue or whether he believed in birth control and abortions or not?  No one candidate no matter which party is going to please everyone in all things and that's where separating the important stuff from the trivial is important.  And yes, the abortion issue is trivial compared to some of the other issues at hand and if you don't see that I feel real sorry for you.

[Exterminator]

And yes, the abortion issue is trivial compared to some of the other issues at hand and if you don't see that I feel real sorry for you.

Seriously?  This from someone whose vote will be cast on her party's candidate's policy of being white?

[me]

Seriously?  This from someone whose vote will be cast on her party's candidate's policy of being white?

Boy is that a false statement.  You just have no clue do you.

[The Troll]

That's still a silly thing to use as a basis on whether to vote for someone or not.  You all know darn well that may be his opinion about the issues but he cannot do anything that congress won't let him.  There are waaaaay more important issues on which to base whether you'd vote for someone or not.  Like Ron Paul and doing away with the military and all that stupid stuff he comes up with.  Would you, if he were a liberal, vote for him on that issue or whether he believed in birth control and abortions or not?  No one candidate no matter which party is going to please everyone in all things and that's where separating the important stuff from the trivial is important.  And yes, the abortion issue is trivial compared to some of the other issues at hand and if you don't see that I feel real sorry for you.

  Still no answer,  If you can't answer the question, would you vote for The American Pope Rick Santorum, just don't say nothing.  Your answers just plain suck

  You say a president can get anything done without Congress.  Why do you Republicans always say Obama going to take our gun away, religious freedom and make us a Socialist government.  All you say is the Republican talking point and just plain bullshit. 

[followsthewolf]

That's still a silly thing to use as a basis on whether to vote for someone or not.  You all know darn well that may be his opinion about the issues but he cannot do anything that congress won't let him.  There are waaaaay more important issues on which to base whether you'd vote for someone or not.  Like Ron Paul and doing away with the military and all that stupid stuff he comes up with.  Would you, if he were a liberal, vote for him on that issue or whether he believed in birth control and abortions or not?  No one candidate no matter which party is going to please everyone in all things and that's where separating the important stuff from the trivial is important.  And yes, the abortion issue is trivial compared to some of the other issues at hand and if you don't see that I feel real sorry for you.

". . .he cannot do anything that congress won't let him."

So that means that all the problems you blame on President Obama really belong on the republican-controlled congress, right?

[me]

". . .he cannot do anything that congress won't let him."

So that means that all the problems you blame on President Obama really belong on the republican-controlled congress, right?

Hey, if ya'll can blame Bush we can blame Obama.  Congress is still Dem controlled in one house and was entirely Dem controlled until last year.

  Still no answer,  If you can't answer the question, would you vote for The American Pope Rick Santorum, just don't say nothing.  Your answers just plain suck

  You say a president can get anything done without Congress.  Why do you Republicans always say Obama going to take our gun away, religious freedom and make us a Socialist government.  All you say is the Republican talking point and just plain bullshit. 

Read Troll read, I don't know if I would vote for him or not but if I do it won't be based on the abortion issue alone. If you can't accept that answer tough shit.

[Exterminator]

Boy is that a false statement.  You just have no clue do you.

You fool no one.

[Palehorse]

And yet ANOTHER example of repugnican emotional propaganda, but this one right here in Indiana from Representative Bob Morris in Ft Wayne:

. . .In a letter obtained by The Journal-Gazette of Fort Wayne on Monday, Rep. Bob Morris of Fort Wayne said he did some research on the Internet and found allegations that the Girl Scouts are a tactical arm of Planned Parenthood, allow transgender females to join and encourage sex.

"After talking to some well-informed constituents, I did a small amount of web-based research, and what I found is disturbing," Morris wrote in his letter, which also accused the group of promoting "homosexual lifestyles." . . .




This is a clear indication that the tea party's "take back our government" initiative was nothing more than a smokescreen that was used by radical and religious extremists to obtain political office!

Moreover, this man is an elected public official and he is basing his decision based on some INTERNET research!?  Really?! (It would appear the entire repugnican party uses this method of research).  When did the internet become an empirical form of evidence? 

I submit that the Girls Scouts are NOT a radical organization, but rather the repugnican party is a prime example of such!

Perhaps we should, as a people, withdraw all support for the repugnican party and demand its abolishment!

[me]

And yet ANOTHER example of repugnican emotional propaganda, but this one right here in Indiana from Representative Bob Morris in Ft Wayne:

. . .In a letter obtained by The Journal-Gazette of Fort Wayne on Monday, Rep. Bob Morris of Fort Wayne said he did some research on the Internet and found allegations that the Girl Scouts are a tactical arm of Planned Parenthood, allow transgender females to join and encourage sex.

"After talking to some well-informed constituents, I did a small amount of web-based research, and what I found is disturbing," Morris wrote in his letter, which also accused the group of promoting "homosexual lifestyles." . . .




This is a clear indication that the tea party's "take back our government" initiative was nothing more than a smokescreen that was used by radical and religious extremists to obtain political office!

Moreover, this man is an elected public official and he is basing his decision based on some INTERNET research!?  Really?! (It would appear the entire repugnican party uses this method of research).  When did the internet become an empirical form of evidence? 

I submit that the Girls Scouts are NOT a radical organization, but rather the repugnican party is a prime example of such!

Perhaps we should, as a people, withdraw all support for the repugnican party and demand its abolishment!

If there is any truth to this part of the story I don't blame him for feeling the way he does, 

A Girl Scouts of America training program last year used the Planned Parenthood sex education pamphlet "Happy, Healthy, and Hot." The pamphlet instructs young girls not to think of sex as "just about vaginal or anal intercourse." "There is no right or wrong way to have sex. Just have fun, explore and be yourself!" it states. Although individual Girl Scout troops are not forced to follow this curriculum, many do. Liberal progressive troop-leaders will indoctrinate the girls in their troop according to the principles of Planned Parenthood, making Bishop Conley's warning true.

Many parents are abandoning the Girl Scouts because they promote homosexual lifestyles. In fact, the Girl Scouts education seminar girls are directed to study the example of role models. Of the fifty role models listed, only three have a briefly-mentioned religious background – all the rest are feminists, lesbians, or Communists. World Net Daily, in a May 2009 article, states that Girl Scout Troops are no longer allowed to pray or sing traditional Christmas Carols.

[The Troll]

If there is any truth to this part of the story I don't blame him for feeling the way he does,

  OMG!  Those nasty little bitches, trying to over throw the country.  I say Boy, I say hang the bitches.  The damn commies.     Bitches.   

[Exterminator]

Moreover, this man is an elected public official and he is basing his decision based on some INTERNET research!?

I posted a comment to a news article saying he is a douche.  Now that it's on the internet, it must be true!   

[Palehorse]

If there is any truth to this part of the story I don't blame him for feeling the way he does,

Seriously!? Where'd you get that, from his "internet search"?

Anyone that seriously reads that kind of crap and reacts without doing even a modicum of fact checking surrounding the source, is in my view, a tool!

You've been on the web long enough to understand where I am coming from on this. You can find anything  on the internet that will support whatever whack nut, zealous statement you want to make. Where the rubber meets the road surrounding this "information" is the credibility of the source, and reliability of the information. No empirical evidence = zero credibility.

Anyone that thinks ANY GS troop in ANY part of this nation, could do such a thing without it resulting in an immediate loud and very public outcry and legal investigation being initiated, seriously needs to have their head examined!