Republican Party, Teabag Party and the Libertarian Party absolutely SUCK!

[Henry Hawk]

  Vell,vell vell, vee have another Republican, Arnold Schwarzenegger to bite the dust.  They can't keep their peckers in their pants.  They have all of the power, fame, money and they won't spend a dollar or two for a fine strong rain coat.   

  It sounds like they start believing their own press, they think they are so  powerful they couldn't possibly get caught.  You know those spermies really don't care how powerful you are.   

I also don't really think he was a "republican".....he was more of a....a.....Kennedy conservative (since he was married to one)...... i.e. liberal

he was much like his Uncle in law teddy...

[The Troll]

Just doing his john Edwards immitation. 

   Keeping everything correct.  john starts with a capital J, like John.  Also immitation is spelled imitation using only one m.

  I am just imitating you sorting fly shit out of black pepper.  Ok?  Even the most smallest thing counts.  Even if it is the size of a No See Ummm.

                                                          --> : <--  Two No See ummms.    Do you See Ummm. 

[Palehorse]

Exactly what I expected from a liberal/progressive. You slam on us for only parroting 'talking points' when it is obvious that you who does this. We asked a simple question for you to clarify or substantiate your claims that the Obamacare bill was amended and filled with pork to the point that it was no longer a Democrat bill and is now a Republican bill. You refuse to do it, so I'll do it for you.

There are no such amendments to the bill. Obamacare is a wholly Democrat monstrocity. The bill was passed without anyone knowing fully what was in it. In fact most of the amendments that the Republicans proposed were defeated and never made it into the bill. The ones that did were mostly technical, changing a word or phrase for clarity. Any substantial amendments that did make it did not change the bill much.

It looks to me that you have realized that this bill was a major mistake on your party's behalf and are now trying to spin it so it becomes the Republican's fault.

If what you say IS true, why didn't you say something about it in the other thread? Why wait over a year to bring it up?

quote Sandy Eggo
You know what? Never mind. I may as well have been speaking in Hebrew. You accuse EVERY one of being sheep, but I've yet to see you post a source that wasn't editorialized or an original document. You don't know what a creditble source is and have never researched the source of your sources. You want to assume that if they agree with what you want to think, that's good enough, so just forget it.

^ What she said. . .

And once again, we see circular logic exemplified. . . 

[Nighthawk]

^ What she said. . .

And once again, we see circular logic exemplified. . . 

Again you fail to answer the questions.

Where is the pork the Republicans added? How did the Republicans change the bill into their own?

You won't answer because you have nothing and you know it.

[Palehorse]

Again you fail to answer the questions.

Where is the pork the Republicans added? How did the Republicans change the bill into their own?

You won't answer because you have nothing and you know it.

YOU first!

"You think your questions stand unanswered? How about these, which you typically "answer" via your SOP entitled, "duck and run". . .  (Even when someone separates them out and creates a new topic to increase visibility of the issues). . . ."

http://theunknownzone.us/smf/index.php?topic=17774.0

[Nighthawk]

   Keeping everything correct.  john starts with a capital J, like John.  Also immitation is spelled imitation using only one m.

  I am just imitating you sorting fly shit out of black pepper.  Ok?  Even the most smallest thing counts.  Even if it is the size of a No See Ummm.

                                                          --> : <--  Two No See ummms.    Do you See Ummm. 

If you're going to correct me, at least get your corrections correct.

That should be, "Even the smallest things count."

Ok should be OK.

It is No-See-Ums

[Nighthawk]

YOU first!

"You think your questions stand unanswered? How about these, which you typically "answer" via your SOP entitled, "duck and run". . .  (Even when someone separates them out and creates a new topic to increase visibility of the issues). . . ."

http://theunknownzone.us/smf/index.php?topic=17774.0

Again, that's what I thought. You can't answer the questions. You know you were talking out your ass and was called on it so now you dodge and try to sidetrack the issue.

Funny how my not answering that other thread wasn't an issue until now. Wonder why that is?

[Palehorse]

Again, that's what I thought. You can't answer the questions. You know you were talking out your ass and was called on it so now you dodge and try to sidetrack the issue.

Funny how my not answering that other thread wasn't an issue until now. Wonder why that is?

You are nothing more than an instigator; and one with the unmitigated audacity to demand from others what you will not do yourself!

Stay around here long enough and you will learn that with me, you get what you give. Shovel me shit and I'll sling it right back by the truckload.

As has already been eloquently stated by my esteemed colleague and previously quoted by this writer:

quote Sandy Eggo
You know what? Never mind. I may as well have been speaking in Hebrew. You accuse EVERY one of being sheep, but I've yet to see you post a source that wasn't editorialized or an original document. You don't know what a creditble source is and have never researched the source of your sources. You want to assume that if they agree with what you want to think, that's good enough, so just forget it.

I'll not engage in initiatives that demonstrate via empirical evidence that they are fruitless. You are without question one of these.

Try meeting the requirements toward support of your positions, as is expected. Only then are you in a position within which to demand or expect the same from others.

As to your last few replies toward me, I consider them all non-reponsive. IF you took the time to examine the links provided earlier by this writer, you'll see not only the answers to your circular logic questions, but also the abject idiocy within your more recent statements and positions.  (ALL of which are highly opinionated and assumptive in nature).

However, in the spirit of facilitating your continuing edification why don't you try looking at the bottom line surrounding the healthcare reform act?

As submitted by the POTUS = 900 billion

As passed = 940 billion.

Where do you think the extra 40 billion came from?

. . .Funny how my not answering that other thread wasn't an issue until now. Wonder why that is?

A) It hasn't just become an issue. In fact, it has been an issue raised several times by others within this forum toward you, and one you consistently run a diversionary tactic against.

B) I never really raised it with you before personally, as I recall, however, if you attempt to hold this writer to a standard that you personally fail to meet yourself, you had best be prepared. (Which you are not).

[The Troll]

  Where? The fairy god mother?    Quote the Goat Sucker ever more. 

[Nighthawk]

You are nothing more than an instigator; and one with the unmitigated audacity to demand from others what you will not do yourself!

Stay around here long enough and you will learn that with me, you get what you give. Shovel me shit and I'll sling it right back by the truckload.

As has already been eloquently stated by my esteemed colleague and previously quoted by this writer:

quote Sandy Eggo
You know what? Never mind. I may as well have been speaking in Hebrew. You accuse EVERY one of being sheep, but I've yet to see you post a source that wasn't editorialized or an original document. You don't know what a creditble source is and have never researched the source of your sources. You want to assume that if they agree with what you want to think, that's good enough, so just forget it.

I'll not engage in initiatives that demonstrate via empirical evidence that they are fruitless. You are without question one of these.

Try meeting the requirements toward support of your positions, as is expected. Only then are you in a position within which to demand or expect the same from others.

As to your last few replies toward me, I consider them all non-reponsive. IF you took the time to examine the links provided earlier by this writer, you'll see not only the answers to your circular logic questions, but also the abject idiocy within your more recent statements and positions.  (ALL of which are highly opinionated and assumptive in nature).

However, in the spirit of facilitating your continuing edification why don't you try looking at the bottom line surrounding the healthcare reform act?

As submitted by the POTUS = 900 billion

As passed = 940 billion.

Where do you think the extra 40 billion came from?

A) It hasn't just become an issue. In fact, it has been an issue raised several times by others within this forum toward you, and one you consistently run a diversionary tactic against.

B) I never really raised it with you before personally, as I recall, however, if you attempt to hold this writer to a standard that you personally fail to meet yourself, you had best be prepared. (Which you are not).

Remember, YOU are the one who made the claim about the pork and changes to the bill and blaming it on Republicans. "Me" asked you for proof of this and you refused to answer her so I asked and you still refuse other than another weak attempt above.

I already told you I went through the post you sited and there is NOTHING there to back up your claims.

40 billion was added to the bill? You have proof of this or who added it? I have looked and can find nothing showing that the Republicans added anything of substance to the bill.

Show any questions that I have purposely not answered, other than the thread you keep throwing out.

[Sandy Eggo]

Pale, I'd let it go. What is it Ex says? You can't teach a pig to dance and it pisses off the pig. You can't teach these two to read critically, research or think. Same difference.

[Sandy Eggo]

Oh,  and you two save your time crying about "liberal insults" You're just as guilty and a tad on the hypocritical side. When you've got nothing you're as predictable as breathing.

[The Troll]

                                    Palehorse    Squawk:


                                    Squawk   Palehorse       

[Palehorse]

Remember, YOU are the one who made the claim about the pork and changes to the bill and blaming it on Republicans. "Me" asked you for proof of this and you refused to answer her so I asked and you still refuse other than another weak attempt above.

Bullshit. Moreover, this very portion of your statement validates the fact you do NOT read anything provided. Had you read any of the links provided earlier you'd have seen the proof!

(Got comprehension skills?)

I already told you I went through the post you sited and there is NOTHING there to back up your claims.

No. . . clearly you didn't! (Spell check is your friend!)

40 billion was added to the bill? You have proof of this or who added it? I have looked and can find nothing showing that the Republicans added anything of substance to the bill.

Really? Seriously?! WTF!

http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/healthreform_sbs_full.pdf

http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/8061.pdf

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/st_healthcareproposals_20090912.html


READ these links and just try to understand what they are showing you!  (Posted earlier within a reply to YOU, which you FAILED to read).

Show any questions that I have purposely not answered, other than the thread you keep throwing out.

The list is far too long, and not worth the effort. (Insert circular logic reply here). 

Pale, I'd let it go. What is it Ex says? You can't teach a pig to dance and it pisses off the pig. You can't teach these two to read critically, research or think. Same difference.

Yeah. I know. . . I need to work on my "toleration of idiots and fools" skill-set! 

[The Troll]

Pale, I'd let it go. What is it Ex says? You can't teach a pig to dance and it pisses off the pig. You can't teach these two to read critically, research or think. Same difference.

  Who was it that said you can put lipstick on a pig and it is still a pig.  Hee, hee, hee.