Democrats SUCK!!

[AbbyTC]

I don't give a rats ass about the other NATO members that has nothing to do with us period. That may make him more succesful than other NATO members but has nothing to do with his handling of our economy.

  Also, the GDP isn't the only thing that tells how well (or poorly) our economy is doing.

[Locutus]

  Also, the GDP isn't the only thing that tells how well (or poorly) our economy is doing.

If you're trying to engage 'me', you'll get used to ----->

[AbbyTC]

If you're trying to engage 'me', you'll get used to ----->

I think I already am used to it!   

[me]

Ya know what.....I feel the same about ya'll with the head bangin' against the wall thing. Ya'll are just too easily impressed with double speak and smooth talk. It's almost like you're worshipping an idol.   

[Exterminator]

I don't give a rats ass about the other NATO members that has nothing to do with us period.

Actually, it has everything to do with us.

[Anne]

Actually, it has everything to do with us.

It doesn't change the fact that under President Obama's leadership there have been that many consecutive years of GDP of less than 3 percent.

[Exterminator]

 

[me]

It doesn't change the fact that under President Obama's leadership there have been that many consecutive years of GDP of less than 3 percent.

They love usin' that fuzzy math Anne.

[The Troll]

It doesn't change the fact that under President Obama's leadership there have been that many consecutive years of GDP of less than 3 percent.

  Repub Anne, what was the GDB under George 42 and his half ass son George W. Bush.  Hummmmm?  You're just like the Hawk, you don't know shit.  shit crazy.   

[Exterminator]

The sub-100 IQ crowd clearly believes we in the U.S. live in a vacuum.   

[AbbyTC]

The sub-100 IQ crowd clearly believes we in the U.S. live in a vacuum.   

You mean there are other countries out there?      

[Anne]

You know, the article stated facts and less than 3 percent is considered a sluggish economy under any president. Yes, I did read the entire article including the tabs. I did a little digging about the gdp in general and found a couple interesting bits of trivia. The gdp was first used in 1929 (at least that is the first record I found) and hopefully we all remember what happened in 1929. Oddly enough the lowest gdp did not happen during the great depression but in the first quarter of 1958 at -10 percent. The highest gdp was in 1950.

I wonder why they only used the original NATO members for comparison.

[Exterminator]

For god's sake, take an economics course!

[me]

You know, the article stated facts and less than 3 percent is considered a sluggish economy under any president. Yes, I did read the entire article including the tabs. I did a little digging about the gdp in general and found a couple interesting bits of trivia. The gdp was first used in 1929 (at least that is the first record I found) and hopefully we all remember what happened in 1929. Oddly enough the lowest gdp did not happen during the great depression but in the first quarter of 1958 at -10 percent. The highest gdp was in 1950.

I wonder why they only used the original NATO members for comparison.

It helped the numbers come out in their favor. 

[me]