Democrats SUCK!!

[Exterminator]

I assume this is a rhetorical question eh?

Indeed.

[The Troll]

  And everyone of these so call crimes are RED HERRINGS.  Everyone of them figments of the Republican Brain. 

  Also Hawk you can't hate any party like I hate and despise the Republican Party and the people like you who support them and their greedy and self serving delusions. 

[Henry Hawk]

Uh, let me see......how should I respond so YOU understand........hmm, OH...I got it!!

BULLSH!T!

Yeah, that's it!!   

[Palehorse]

Oh, and that Benghazi tale told on 60 minutes? Lies! (Same as the book written by the same "source").

. . ."In this case, we were wrong. We made a mistake," Logan said on "CBS This Morning." "That's disappointing for any journalist. It's very disappointing for me."
A primary source for the "60 Minutes" report on October 27 was a security contractor using the pseudonym "Morgan Jones," later identified as Dylan Davies. Davies told CBS he was able to reach the Benghazi compound on the night of September 11, 2012, scale a wall and even fight off a militant.
Also on Friday, the publisher of a book containing Davies' account said it was suspending the sale and publication of the book. Threshold Editions, an imprint of Simon & Schuster, is recommending that booksellers not sell "The Embassy House" and return the books, spokeswoman Jennifer Robinson told CNN. . .

http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/08/politics/cbs-benghazi/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

[Exterminator]

Oh, and that Benghazi tale told on 60 minutes? Lies! (Same as the book written by the same "source").

. . ."In this case, we were wrong. We made a mistake," Logan said on "CBS This Morning." "That's disappointing for any journalist. It's very disappointing for me."
A primary source for the "60 Minutes" report on October 27 was a security contractor using the pseudonym "Morgan Jones," later identified as Dylan Davies. Davies told CBS he was able to reach the Benghazi compound on the night of September 11, 2012, scale a wall and even fight off a militant.
Also on Friday, the publisher of a book containing Davies' account said it was suspending the sale and publication of the book. Threshold Editions, an imprint of Simon & Schuster, is recommending that booksellers not sell "The Embassy House" and return the books, spokeswoman Jennifer Robinson told CNN. . .

http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/08/politics/cbs-benghazi/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Funny, I'm not seeing any of the neocons who were gleefully blathering on about this apologizing for having been so gullible?

[me]

Funny, I'm not seeing any of the neocons who were gleefully blathering on about this apologizing for having been so gullible?

No one really knows for sure now do they?  Well, except for the survivors who were there and they aren't talking for some strange reason, the ones who haven't met with unfortunate accidents at any rate.

[Palehorse]

No one really knows for sure now do they?  Well, except for the survivors who were there and they aren't talking for some strange reason, the ones who haven't met with unfortunate accidents at any rate.

Here's a clue; When you use lies as a foundational building block for your theories, and they are exposed, it severely undermines your credibility. (Am I the only one who sees the irony in my explaining this to this specific poster?)

[me]

Here's a clue; When you use lies as a foundational building block for your theories, and they are exposed, it severely undermines your credibility. (Am I the only one who sees the irony in my explaining this to this specific poster?)

Then just why isn't anyone who was there allowed to talk?  There is just entirely too many things, start with the lie about the film causing the attack when they all knew better, that doesn't make sense. 

[The Troll]

Then just why isn't anyone who was there allowed to talk?  There is just entirely too many things, start with the lie about the film causing the attack when they all knew better, that doesn't make sense.

   Why don't you give up.  Chasing shadows that don't exist, the windmills in your mind.  :dah:  Looking for someone to blame here in the United State when there is no one.  Why don't you blame the people who planned and did this crime, Muslim terrorist.   

[Palehorse]

Then just why isn't anyone who was there allowed to talk?  There is just entirely too many things, start with the lie about the film causing the attack when they all knew better, that doesn't make sense.

You want answers and you want them right fucking now don't you? Well, the fact is when Americans make such demands upon any entity, the initial answers are going to be incorrect 80% of the time or better.

You squawk about national security and endorse the imposition of legislation that invades the privacy of individual citizens of this country, restricting constitutionally protected rights, and yet want to know right fucking now what went wrong in incidents like Benghazi; no matter if it reveals state-secrets that represent a real and present danger to national security or not. And when you don't get them you cry cover-up. And when you do and they are incorrect, you cry cover up. And if they reveal the truth you'll cry treason over the fact the information risks the lives of American citizens world-wide.

You want to cry about shit like this, then why aren't you crying over the assassination of JFK and the state secrets still being held over that? Why aren't you crying over the fact that those state secrets will never be revealed until long after most of us reading this are worm food?

Why? Because you are a hypocrite and whether you publicly or inwardly acknowledge it or not, you are a racist as well.

[Palehorse]

Funny, I'm not seeing any of the neocons who were gleefully blathering on about this apologizing for having been so gullible?

And you will not. Because doing so would cast a light that is positive upon the current administration. 

These assholes compound every single situation they view as a mistake into one of astounding proportions of their own, and they will not learn or take accountability for the lies and collateral damage their ass-clownery imposes upon the entire nation. 

[me]

You want answers and you want them right fucking now don't you? Well, the fact is when Americans make such demands upon any entity, the initial answers are going to be incorrect 80% of the time or better.

You squawk about national security and endorse the imposition of legislation that invades the privacy of individual citizens of this country, restricting constitutionally protected rights, and yet want to know right fucking now what went wrong in incidents like Benghazi; no matter if it reveals state-secrets that represent a real and present danger to national security or not. And when you don't get them you cry cover-up. And when you do and they are incorrect, you cry cover up. And if they reveal the truth you'll cry treason over the fact the information risks the lives of American citizens world-wide.

You want to cry about shit like this, then why aren't you crying over the assassination of JFK and the state secrets still being held over that? Why aren't you crying over the fact that those state secrets will never be revealed until long after most of us reading this are worm food?

Why? Because you are a hypocrite and whether you publicly or inwardly acknowledge it or not, you are a racist as well.

And just how do you know I never said anything about the Kennedy killing and the fact they locked everything away for 100 yrs?  Did you know me when that happened?  Has that been discussed here since I've been around to get in on a discussion?  You are assuming again and making untrue assessments based on a wrong assumption.  Hate to tell you this but I have just as much right to question this administration as everyone had to question previous administrations and to be called racist for doing so is wrong and giving the impression that anything that happens or is done should be condoned just because the POTUS happens to be black which is the same as giving him a free pass to anything he wants.  Do you not realize that is a form of racism?  You see the POTUS as a black man, which is obvious by your remarks, and I see him as a man period.  Being black does not make him special as liberals seem to want people to think, that smacks of him being used by them as a puppet.  Use some of your critical thinking and do it with an open mind for a change instead of based on the fact that the POTUS is black. 

Benghazi happened over a year ago and was lied about from the get go as to the cause and that in itself is enough to arouse suspicion. 

[me]

Funny, I'm not seeing any of the neocons who were gleefully blathering on about this apologizing for having been so gullible?

I did not see a true apology.  What I seen was a scripted speech being delivered  because his own party was on him to do something.

[Henry Hawk]

He is only apologizing that people misunderstood him and the administration.......he did NOT accept responsibility of this disaster.....He continues to find ways to blame it on everybody but himself.  he is a first class ASS.

[Palehorse]