Is Sarah Palin really this fuckin' stupid?

[me]

No, saying everyone has to agree with Obama because he's black is a tactic the Dems are using to divide and conquer.  I still don't like his policies and all the BS and telling me I have no right to challenge or disagree isn't going to work.  We all have a right to our opinion and Obama's being black doesn't change that no matter how you try to spin it. If Condi Rice had ran and won and you disagreed with her I guess that would have made you all both woman haters and racists using the type of logic you're all spewing.  Get a grip for pete's sake. 

This is another flawed debating club tactic you still use, me. When you can't dispute the facts, you dispute the style. It didn't work in high school and it doesn't work now.

[The Troll]

1. If I remember correctly, our Constitution is STILL intact the day President GW Bush left office....NOT DESTROYED AT ALL...

2. You cannot be serious about the spending can you?  really?....the day obama took office last year to the end of the current fiscal year, (according to the Office of Management and Budget), the debt held by the public will grow by $3.3 trillion.....in 20 months, obama will add as much debt as President Bush ran up in eight years....

President Bush's deficits ran an average of 3.2% of GDP....slightly above the post World War II average of 2.7%.....obama's plan calls for deficits that will average 4.2% over the next decade.

obama just spent $787 billion on a stimulus bill that said at the time unemployment would not climb over 8%, yet it, to this day, hovers around 10%..........he spent $30 billion on expansion of a child health-care program....and a $410 billion federal spending bill that increased nondefense discretionary spending 10% for the last half of fiscal year 2009. 

THAT IS CALLED SPENDING US INTO OBLIVION!!!!!

3. Obama ironically has bailed out our Banks, which happened to be some of his BIGGEST supporters....Citigroup and Goldman Sachs Group and Lehman Brothers ALL gave him a real nice inauguration....how convenient!!!

a.  Let's not forget who the biggest recipient of political donations (obama) by BP...no wonder it took obama two weeks to respond!!!.....AND don't forget that it was OBAMA's administration that gave a safety award last year on the very BP drilling platform that is leaking in the Gulf or that the Interior Department claimed it inspected the drilling platform just 10 days before the accident!!! hmmm ...

b.  and we GOT to remember his union buddies, who got a FAT bailout (GM & Chrysler)....and has since has taken very nice care of those corrupted thieves....http://www.nrtw.org/en/blog/machinsts-private-jet-02112509

4.  Bigots and racists?.............let's look at Obama and his party and discuss BIGOTS.....
      a. Jesse Jackson - an anti semite -who loved the word hymie...
      b. Harry Reid - referring to obama as a "light-skinned" and speaks with a "Negro dialect"
      c. Trinity Church - a church that obama attended for nearly twenty years.......http://sweetness-light.com/archive/barack-obamas-church-ultra-left-and-afrocentric ...could you imagine the media having a feast IF Bush had attended a church that was strictly committed to the 'white' community?, the 'white' family?, that pledged to allocate it's money to 'white' business?, embraces the 'white' value system?...
      d. The democrat party that was against the civil rights act of 1964...and advocates of segregation....
      e. What party called Clarence Thomas an "Uncle Tom" for being the only black on the SCOTUS, which was nominated by the republicans?
      f.  What party put in the first black woman ever to be a Secretary of State? Condi Rice.
      g. What party put in the first black Secretary of State? Colin Powell
and the best you can do is call the tea party a bunch of bigots?.. ...really? 

to sum it up for YOU DANNY........it is YOU muther fukkers who are destroying our Constitution..like your business takeovers such as GM & Chrysler?....and Fannie Mae?..Constitutional?... ...    How about your desire for redistribution of wealth?.. ...   How about the Health Care Bill where you are forcing individuals to BUY a commodity?... ..

why don't YOU dan and YOUR buddies get a fukking clue....


this rant has been brought to you by a party who has common sense 

  Yeah, like you stay up all night worrying about the national debt.  A little hemorrhoid on the big asshole of life.  Your going to do something about it.  Fat chance.

   Reagan had the larges deficit in history.  Bush 42 had a large deficit, had to raise taxes.  Remember "No new taxes".  Clinton broke even, then came little George W.  broke all record on deficits.  Broke this country and you bitch.  Your a joke.   

[Henry Hawk]

Go ahead Troll, disregard the facts and make it a joke, that is ALWAYS your tactic and it is not a good one....and go ahead and just ignore the rest of the FACTS that I posted....you act big and bad here with all of your liberal buddies laughing with you....but, facts are facts....

[Bo D]

....but, facts are facts....

The U.S. budget situation has deteriorated significantly since 2001, when the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) forecast average annual surpluses of approximately $850 billion from 2009-2012. The average deficit forecast in each of those years is now approximately $1,215 billion. The New York Times analyzed this roughly $2 trillion "swing," separating the causes into four major categories along with their share:

    * Recessions or the business cycle (37%);
    * Policies enacted by President Bush (33%);
    * Policies enacted by President Bush and supported or extended by President Obama (20%); and
    * New policies from President Obama (10%).

A variety of tax cuts were enacted under President Bush between 2001–2003, through the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (JGTRRA).

The non-partisan Pew Charitable Trusts estimated in May 2010 that extending some or all of the Bush tax cuts would have the following impact under these scenarios:

    * Making the tax cuts permanent for all taxpayers, regardless of income, would cost the Treasury $3.1 trillion over the next 10 years.
    * Limiting the extension to individuals making less than $200,000 and married couples earning less than $250,000 would cost about $2.3 trillion in the next decade.
    * Extending the tax cuts for all taxpayers for only two years would cost $558 billion over the next 10 years.

[me]

The U.S. budget situation has deteriorated significantly since 2001, when the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) forecast average annual surpluses of approximately $850 billion from 2009-2012. The average deficit forecast in each of those years is now approximately $1,215 billion. The New York Times analyzed this roughly $2 trillion "swing," separating the causes into four major categories along with their share:

    * Recessions or the business cycle (37%);
    * Policies enacted by President Bush (33%);
    * Policies enacted by President Bush and supported or extended by President Obama (20%); and
    * New policies from President Obama (10%).

A variety of tax cuts were enacted under President Bush between 2001–2003, through the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (JGTRRA).

The non-partisan Pew Charitable Trusts estimated in May 2010 that extending some or all of the Bush tax cuts would have the following impact under these scenarios:

    * Making the tax cuts permanent for all taxpayers, regardless of income, would cost the Treasury $3.1 trillion over the next 10 years.
    * Limiting the extension to individuals making less than $200,000 and married couples earning less than $250,000 would cost about $2.3 trillion in the next decade.
    * Extending the tax cuts for all taxpayers for only two years would cost $558 billion over the next 10 years.

Simple math BS bookwork juggling to make things appear that way when they really aren't. 

The treasury will have nothing if no one gets back to work and more jobs are lost because there will be no one paying taxes.  More people working paying less taxes equals more than no one working and a few paying high taxes.  Simple enough for you even to understand, or at least one would think so.   Is the system you're wanting so badly working in Greece and the UK?  No, it isn't.  What makes anyone think it will work here?

[Henry Hawk]

again, they turn the table, but refuse to look at everything I posted.....that is such a common tactic on here....

[Palehorse]

It has worked for 234 years. . . There's only one thing different now. . .

[The Troll]

again, they turn the table, but refuse to look at everything I posted.....that is such a common tactic on here....

   Figures lie and liars figure.  So go figure.   

[Henry Hawk]

   Figures lie and liars figure.  So go figure. 

there were no lies in my figures.......it is easy for you to just say there is......but, there isn't any......you best and always response it try to post something witty or funny.........that is when I know that I got ya...

[Bo D]

the day obama took office last year to the end of the current fiscal year, (according to the Office of Management and Budget), the debt held by the public will grow by $3.3 trillion.....in 20 months, obama will add as much debt as President Bush ran up in eight years....

President Bush's deficits ran an average of 3.2% of GDP....slightly above the post World War II average of 2.7%.....obama's plan calls for deficits that will average 4.2% over the next decade.

Simple math BS bookwork juggling to make things appear that way when they really aren't.

[The Troll]

  What should he have done.  Set on his ass like Herbert Hoover and did nothing.

[Bo D]

  What should he have done.  Set on his ass like Herbert Hoover and did nothing.

Ummmm .... I think you're asking the wrong person that question, Dude!

[The Troll]

Ummmm .... I think you're asking the wrong person that question, Dude!

   Weeell Dude, you the one who made an issue of the money he has spent.  Since you make the issue maybe you, Dude could explain how he he should handle the load of crap that George W. left him

  The Troll    Dude.

[Sandy Eggo]

Troll, I think if you'll look a little closer, Olias was refuting Henry's "facts" re: Obama's spending.

[LOsborne]

Troll, I think if you'll look a little closer, Olias was refuting Henry's "facts" re: Obama's spending.

Hah! Ain't it embarrassing when someone who claims to be on your side can't follow the thread of the discussion? Like I keep saying at work .. "Just don't HELP me!"