Global Warming

[Bo D]

because it is pointless...

Because you don't know ....

[Henry Hawk]

Because you don't know ....

I have not wasted my time to worry about it, because it is NOT going to happen.

What will happen to the world if the moon blows up?    Same scenerio

[Bo D]

Forget global warming - it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again)

   
• Met Office releases new figures which show no warming in 15 years

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2093264/Forget-global-warming--Cycle-25-need-worry-NASA-scientists-right-Thames-freezing-again.html#ixzz1pHlaG9J7

Pal Brekke, senior adviser at the Norwegian Space Centre, said some scientists found the importance of water cycles difficult to accept, because doing so means admitting that the oceans – not CO2 – caused much of the global warming between 1970 and 1997.

The same goes for the impact of the sun – which was highly active for much of the 20th Century.

'Nature is about to carry out a very interesting experiment,' he said. 'Ten or 15 years from now, we will be able to determine much better whether the warming of the late 20th Century really was caused by man-made CO2, or by natural variability.'

Meanwhile, since the end of last year, world temperatures have fallen by more than half a degree, as the cold 'La Nina' effect has re-emerged in the South Pacific.

'We're now well into the second decade of the pause,' said Benny Peiser, director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation. 'If we don't see convincing evidence of global warming by 2015, it will start to become clear whether the models are bunk. And, if they are, the implications for some scientists could be very serious.'

Oh .... and your little "article" here which says "Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997."


Look what the  Met Office has to say about that ....

http://metofficenews.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/met-office-in-the-media-29-january-2012/

Today the Mail on Sunday published a story written by David Rose entitled "Forget global warming – it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about".

This article includes numerous errors in the reporting of published peer reviewed science undertaken by the Met Office Hadley Centre and for Mr. Rose to suggest that the latest global temperatures available show no warming in the last 15 years is entirely misleading.

Despite the Met Office having spoken to David Rose ahead of the publication of the story, he has chosen to not fully include the answers we gave him to questions around decadal projections produced by the Met Office or his belief that we have seen no warming since 1997.

what is absolutely clear is that we have continued to see a trend of warming, with the decade of 2000-2009 being clearly the warmest in the instrumental record going back to 1850. Depending on which temperature records you use, 2010 was the warmest year on record  for NOAA NCDC and NASA GISS, and the second warmest on record in HadCRUT3."

Now which would you believe, the actual source .... or some guy purposely misquoting that source?

[Bo D]

I have not wasted my time to worry about it, because it is NOT going to happen.

What will happen to the world if the moon blows up?    Same scenerio

Sheeesh! You really don't know and you don't even know how to look it up. Well, to make a long story short .... global warming melts the Arctic ice cap. Which in turn, reverses to Gulf Stream (which if you didn't know, keeps Europe and England warm.) The England and Europe freeze.

Get it? Global warming = Europe freezes.

[Exterminator]

Because I am ...... Reason Man! Sworn to fight against ignorance wherever I find it. 

LOL...good luck with that!   

[The Troll]

I have not wasted my time to worry about it, because it is NOT going to happen.

What will happen to the world if the moon blows up?    Same scenerio

  If this doesn't show the depth of Henry's knowledge and his scientific savvy.  All I can say is that it shows he wouldn't know shit from Shinola. 

[libby]

Oh .... and your little "article" here which says "Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997."


Look what the  Met Office has to say about that ....

http://metofficenews.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/met-office-in-the-media-29-january-2012/

Today the Mail on Sunday published a story written by David Rose entitled "Forget global warming – it's Cycle 25 we need to worry about".

This article includes numerous errors in the reporting of published peer reviewed science undertaken by the Met Office Hadley Centre and for Mr. Rose to suggest that the latest global temperatures available show no warming in the last 15 years is entirely misleading.

Despite the Met Office having spoken to David Rose ahead of the publication of the story, he has chosen to not fully include the answers we gave him to questions around decadal projections produced by the Met Office or his belief that we have seen no warming since 1997.

what is absolutely clear is that we have continued to see a trend of warming, with the decade of 2000-2009 being clearly the warmest in the instrumental record going back to 1850. Depending on which temperature records you use, 2010 was the warmest year on record  for NOAA NCDC and NASA GISS, and the second warmest on record in HadCRUT3."

Now which would you believe, the actual source .... or some guy purposely misquoting that source?

[Henry Hawk]

Now which would you believe, the actual source .... or some guy purposely misquoting that source?

Oh, you mean "some guy" who happens to be the director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation...yeah, he probably doesn't know what he is talking about does he?

spin, spin, spin...

[Exterminator]

...Global Warming Policy Foundation...

You might want to do a little research on this group, their stated objectives and the sources of their funding.  Only a fool is so easily fooled by an official sounding name.

[Henry Hawk]

You might want to do a little research on this group, their stated objectives and the sources of their funding.  Only a fool is so easily fooled by an official sounding name.

and YOU might want to TRY to do a little research OTHER than Wikipedia....(talk about fools)

I did do a little research:

The GWPF is funded overwhelmingly by voluntary donations from a number of private individuals and charitable trusts. In order to make clear its complete independence, it does not accept gifts from either energy companies or anyone with a significant interest in an energy company.

[Exterminator]

The GWPF is funded overwhelmingly by voluntary donations from a number of private individuals and charitable trusts. In order to make clear its complete independence, it does not accept gifts from either energy companies or anyone with a significant interest in an energy company.

Their claim but they keep the sources of their funding secret for gullible fools.

[Bo D]

Oh, you mean "some guy" who happens to be the director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation...yeah, he probably doesn't know what he is talking about does he?

spin, spin, spin...

Does that change the fact that he LIED about the Met Office Report?

I reiterate ... He said "Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997."

The Met Office said ...
"This article includes numerous errors in the reporting of published peer reviewed science undertaken by the Met Office Hadley Centre and for Mr. Rose to suggest that the latest global temperatures available show no warming in the last 15 years is entirely misleading. .... what is absolutely clear is that we have continued to see a trend of warming, with the decade of 2000-2009 being clearly the warmest in the instrumental record going back to 1850. Depending on which temperature records you use, 2010 was the warmest year on record "

LIAR, LIAR, LIAR 

[Henry Hawk]

Does that change the fact that he LIED about the Met Office Report?

I reiterate ... He said "Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997."

The Met Office said ...
"This article includes numerous errors in the reporting of published peer reviewed science undertaken by the Met Office Hadley Centre and for Mr. Rose to suggest that the latest global temperatures available show no warming in the last 15 years is entirely misleading. .... what is absolutely clear is that we have continued to see a trend of warming, with the decade of 2000-2009 being clearly the warmest in the instrumental record going back to 1850. Depending on which temperature records you use, 2010 was the warmest year on record "

LIAR, LIAR, LIAR 

well so is Obama!!  ....nanny nanny boo boo!!

I have run out of time to defend, but I WILL be back!!   

[Bo D]

I have run out of time to defend,

You really mean to defend those lies you posted?


..................When you repeat the lies of others, they become your own.

[me]

Maybe that $50 light bulb will solve the whole problem,,,that is if the company doesn't go bankrupt.