(CNN) - A Wisconsin judge on Friday ruled as unconstitutional major portions of the controversial state law that restricted the collective bargaining rights of many public employees.
Dane County Circuit Judge Juan B. Colas found several aspects of the law contrary to both the state and U.S. constitutions. . . .
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/14/judge-tosses-much-of-wis-collective-bargaining-law/?hpt=hp_t1 (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/14/judge-tosses-much-of-wis-collective-bargaining-law/?hpt=hp_t1)
Seems in their rush to burn the rights of union workers, conservatives trampled all over their constitutional rights! :yes:
WWWWWWWWaaaaaaaaaaa. They lost get over it.
Quote from: me on September 15, 2012, 08:23:25 AM
WWWWWWWWaaaaaaaaaaa. They lost get over it.
Yep. The conservative jack-booted thugs did indeed lose! :yes: :yes: :yes:
Quote from: me on September 15, 2012, 08:23:25 AM
WWWWWWWWaaaaaaaaaaa. They lost get over it.
Wow.
Continually breaking new ground in the area of dullness and being inconsiderate.
Proving it daily.
I appreciate your helping me to understand just what conservatives are all about.
Thank you.
Conservatives hate the Constitution.
Quote from: followsthewolf on September 15, 2012, 09:12:34 AM
Wow.
Continually breaking new ground in the area of dullness and being inconsiderate.
Proving it daily.
I appreciate your helping me to understand just what conservatives are all about.
Thank you.
There was a vote, the people spoke, what can be more clear than that? What is the point in voting if it isn't going to count and the dems keep wanting a do over every time things don't go their way?
Quote from: me on September 15, 2012, 08:34:18 PM
There was a vote, the people spoke, what can be more clear than that?
The people spoke? I thought it was the legislature and governor's actions that led to passage of the law.
Quote from: me on September 15, 2012, 08:34:18 PM
What is the point in voting if it isn't going to count and the dems keep wanting a do over every time things don't go their way?
Now surely you don't expect legislators, or the public in general for that matter, to always vote for things that are constitutional, right? :wink:
Quote from: Locutus on September 15, 2012, 09:36:39 PM
The people spoke? I thought it was the legislature and governor's actions that led to passage of the law.
Now surely you don't expect legislators, or the public in general for that matter, to always vote for things that are constitutional, right? :wink:
I stand corrected. You're right...it's been a loooong day. They, the people, voted on whether to keep the same governor in office the dems left town to keep from voting on the collective bargaining issue.
Quote from: me on September 15, 2012, 10:12:50 PM
I stand corrected. You're right...it's been a loooong day. They, the people, voted on whether to keep the same governor in office the dems left town to keep from voting on the collective bargaining issue.
And your snarky attitude speaks louder than your half-assed apology.
A person with integrity would have said, flat out, "I'm sorry, I was wrong," instead of your half-assed apology with a spin to say something negative at all costs to save your ignorant reply.
God, you never quit being a jerk.
Quote from: followsthewolf on September 16, 2012, 09:41:28 AM
And your snarky attitude speaks louder than your half-assed apology.
A person with integrity would have said, flat out, "I'm sorry, I was wrong," instead of your half-assed apology with a spin to say something negative at all costs to save your ignorant reply.
God, you never quit being a jerk.
And you never quit reading things into my posts that aren't there. I was not being a jerk I was just speaking the truth.
And you never directly reply to a point.
Aren't you going to directly apologize for your snark, or are you so obtuse that you don't even see it?
Quote from: followsthewolf on September 16, 2012, 11:08:25 AM
And you never directly reply to a point.
Aren't you going to directly apologize for your snark, or are you so obtuse that you don't even see it?
Why should I?
And that response illustrates perfectly what you are all about.
Dumber than a rock, with the sensitivity of a cactus.
I've seldom ever seen such a combination, even on the internet.
Quote from: followsthewolf on September 16, 2012, 02:11:40 PM
And that response illustrates perfectly what you are all about.
Dumber than a rock, with the sensitivity of a cactus.
I've seldom ever seen such a combination, even on the internet.
Do you apologize for snarks? It was true and they took the chicken way out so I was within my rights to make it. I'm entitled, free speech ya know.
Quote from: me on September 16, 2012, 03:09:01 PM
Do you apologize for snarks? It was true and they took the chicken way out so I was within my rights to make it. I'm entitled, free speech ya know.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we know about free speech, we know that lawmakers are to make laws that are not a violation of the American Constitution, and their state Constitution. :yes:
But one question, why is it that when the Republicans get a majority of the votes in a senate or the house of representatives? They vote against unions and the working people's rights. Against women's rights to control their own body and equal pay for equal work. In other words their war against women. Plus passing laws to restrict voters voting and their rights to vote? :angry:
People who are Republican and vote Republican do not have any morals or self respect for other people rights and well being. The Republicans and the Republican Party are the SCABS of the earth. Got that Skippy. Just saying. :biggrin:
Quote from: me on September 16, 2012, 03:09:01 PM
Do you apologize for snarks? It was true and they took the chicken way out so I was within my rights to make it. I'm entitled, free speech ya know.
Yes, if I've been snarky during an error.
Absolutely.
Quote from: The Troll on September 16, 2012, 03:59:02 PM
Yeah, yeah, yeah, we know about free speech, we know that lawmakers are to make laws that are not a violation of the American Constitution, and their state Constitution. :yes:
But one question, why is it that when the Republicans get a majority of the votes in a senate or the house of representatives? They vote against unions and the working people's rights. Against women's rights to control their own body and equal pay for equal work. In other words their war against women. Plus passing laws to restrict voters voting and their rights to vote? :angry:
People who are Republican and vote Republican do not have any morals or self respect for other people rights and well being. The Republicans and the Republican Party are the SCABS of the earth. Got that Skippy. Just saying. :biggrin:
Who the hell is trying to restrict voters rights?
Quote from: me on September 16, 2012, 04:40:47 PM
Who the hell is trying to restrict voters rights?
Republicans.
Quote from: Locutus on September 16, 2012, 04:54:18 PM
Republicans.
In what way? And don't start with that voter ID thing again 'cause that's BS.
Quote from: me on September 16, 2012, 05:00:05 PM
In what way? And don't start with that voter ID thing again 'cause that's BS.
What did that Republican attorney general for Pennsylvania say. Photo ID will deliver Pennsylvania to Mitt Romney, "DONE"!
Republican Minnesota Senator. Because of voter ID, Mitt Romney will win Minnesota.
Indiana Photo ID was passed by the Republican controlled state house and Mitch Daniels to make sure that Indiana would never go for Barack Obama again. :rant:
The god damn Republican can't win an election without lying and using deceit to win at any cost. There is not one state in the United States controlled by the Democrats that have passed any voter restrictions. Only the god damn lying Republicans. :mad: :mad: :rant:
Quote from: The Troll on September 16, 2012, 06:55:19 PM
What did that Republican attorney general for Pennsylvania say. Photo ID will deliver Pennsylvania to Mitt Romney, "DONE"!
Republican Minnesota Senator. Because of voter ID, Mitt Romney will win Minnesota.
Indiana Photo ID was passed by the Republican controlled state house and Mitch Daniels to make sure that Indiana would never go for Barack Obama again. :rant:
The god damn Republican can't win an election without lying and using deceit to win at any cost. There is not one state in the United States controlled by the Democrats that have passed any voter restrictions. Only the god damn lying Republicans. :mad: :mad: :rant:
You'd better think about what you just said Troll. ID's are free in Indiana and you do have to have them for any kind of government help, food stamps, welfare, SSI, and admittance to a hospital. Dem's still win here and in other places where ID's are required. Voter ID's were required when he was voted for the first time here and in other places which required ID's so your reasoning doesn't make sense.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on September 16, 2012, 07:54:49 PM
bullshit
Why is it bullshit? What party is behind the laws that are under the scrutiny of the courts lately? It's certainly not the Democrats.
That reply is becoming pretty common around here, but most of those who use it typically explain why the post to which they're replying is bullshit. So if you have some evidence to offer up regarding why my answer is bullshit, I'm all ears. :wink:
Quote from: me on September 16, 2012, 05:00:05 PM
In what way? And don't start with that voter ID thing again 'cause that's BS.
It's not just voter ID laws. It's changing of early voting times; it's the changing of voter registration laws; it's the making/changing of any voting rules, procedures, and regulations to the benefit of the Republican party. The list is quite lengthy.
Quote from: Locutus on September 16, 2012, 09:16:55 PM
It's not just voter ID laws. It's changing of early voting times; it's the changing of voter registration laws; it's the making/changing of any voting rules, procedures, and regulations to the benefit of the Republican party. The list is quite lengthy.
Where are these things being done? Now while you're complaining about this remember it was the dems wanting to disenfranchise the military vote by disallowing their mail ins.
Quote from: me on September 16, 2012, 09:58:06 PM
Where are these things being done?
It's being done in numerous states. If you want examples, see the court challenges that are currently going on regarding these laws. Voter suppression regarding changing of early voting times is occurring right here in Florida. I can cite specific examples of it.
Quote from: me on September 16, 2012, 09:58:06 PM
Now while you're complaining about this remember it was the dems wanting to disenfranchise the military vote by disallowing their mail ins.
Really? How's that? Be real careful because I'm familiar with the case. How exactly do the democrats want to disenfranchise the military vote? :wink:
Quote from: me on September 16, 2012, 09:58:06 PM
Now while you're complaining about this remember it was the dems wanting to disenfranchise the military vote by disallowing their mail ins.
You know, I really can't believe you said this. It's simply not true and may end up on the TUZ flat out lie tracker.
Quote from: me on September 16, 2012, 09:58:06 PM
Where are these things being done? Now while you're complaining about this remember it was the dems wanting to disenfranchise the military vote by disallowing their mail ins.
I have a suspicion that you are spreading this lie.
http://factcheck.org/2012/08/obama-not-trying-to-curb-military-early-voting/ (http://factcheck.org/2012/08/obama-not-trying-to-curb-military-early-voting/)
Quote from: Olias on September 17, 2012, 09:39:16 AM
I have a suspicion that you are spreading this lie.
http://factcheck.org/2012/08/obama-not-trying-to-curb-military-early-voting/ (http://factcheck.org/2012/08/obama-not-trying-to-curb-military-early-voting/)
Of course she is. Once again, she's squawking about something she knows nothing about.
Quote from: Locutus on September 17, 2012, 11:16:40 AM
Of course she is. Once again, she's squawking about something she knows nothing about.
The story of "ME" and Henry, "None so blind as those who cannot see" and "None so empty as those who are full of themselves." :salute: :tiphat: :biggrin:
Quote from: Olias on September 17, 2012, 09:39:16 AM
I have a suspicion that you are spreading this lie.
http://factcheck.org/2012/08/obama-not-trying-to-curb-military-early-voting/ (http://factcheck.org/2012/08/obama-not-trying-to-curb-military-early-voting/)
Didn't even know about that so, no, has nothing to do with that.
Quote from: me on September 18, 2012, 09:25:38 AM
Didn't even know about that so, no, has nothing to do with that.
OK. So where did you get the idea that " it was the dems wanting to disenfranchise the military vote by disallowing their mail ins?"
Quote from: Olias on September 18, 2012, 09:39:21 AM
OK. So where did you get the idea that " it was the dems wanting to disenfranchise the military vote by disallowing their mail ins?"
This ought to be good...
Quote from: Exterminator on September 18, 2012, 10:06:46 AM
This ought to be good...
Don't hold your breath. I doubt she will answer.
Quote from: Olias on September 18, 2012, 10:17:41 AM
Don't hold your breath. I doubt she will answer.
Have you ever noticed that Repubs never answer a question after you have nailed them to the wall. :haha:
Or she makes a snarky remark, spins it off to divert attention, and fails to apologize for the lie while blaming someone else or some exigent circumstances for "misspeaking."
Quote from: followsthewolf on September 18, 2012, 12:49:48 PM
Or she makes a snarky remark, spins it off to divert attention, and fails to apologize for the lie while blaming someone else or some exigent circumstances for "misspeaking."
I'm practicing to become a democrat.
Quote from: me on September 18, 2012, 04:27:01 PM
I'm practicing to become a democrat.
You could never be a Democrat, especieally since your operation. What operation? The operation you had when you had your heart replaced with a lump of black coal. :haha: But you can keep working at Sweet Pea. :kiss: A Big Fat Chance. :haha: :haha: :rotfl: :rotfl:
Quote from: Olias on September 18, 2012, 09:39:21 AM
OK. So where did you get the idea that " it was the dems wanting to disenfranchise the military vote by disallowing their mail ins?"
11 hours later and the only "answer" forthcoming is:
Quote from: me on September 18, 2012, 04:27:01 PM
I'm practicing to become a democrat.
Seem's to me you've got being a repugnican down pat. . . :rolleyes:
Quote from: Palehorse on September 18, 2012, 07:53:19 PM
11 hours later and the only "answer" forthcoming is:
Seem's to me you've got being a repugnican down pat. . . :rolleyes:
:thumbsup: :salute: :tiphat:
Quote from: me on September 18, 2012, 04:27:01 PM
I'm practicing to become a democrat.
(http://i475.photobucket.com/albums/rr111/hlovett_2008/37806_500515806627420_1836461201_n_zpsa765b61d.jpg)
Quote from: Palehorse on September 18, 2012, 07:53:19 PM
11 hours later and the only "answer" forthcoming is:
Did you expect anything different? That was clearly the case she was talking about, and then when she can't back up her silly claim, she changes the subject. It's happened time and again around here. There's a reason people end up on the TUZ Flat Out Lie Tracker thread. :yes:
Quote from: Locutus on September 18, 2012, 09:09:40 PM
Did you expect anything different? That was clearly the case she was talking about, and then when she can't back up her silly claim, she changes the subject. It's happened time and again around here. There's a reason people end up on the TUZ Flat Out Lie Tracker thread. :yes:
Yeah. . . but I am the first person to induct myself into that hall of shame! :icon_twisted:
Quote from: Palehorse on September 18, 2012, 09:12:45 PM
Yeah. . . but I am the first person to induct myself into that hall of shame! :icon_twisted:
:biggrin: :yes:
noble |ˈnōbəl|:
2. having or showing fine personal qualities or high moral principles and ideals
:wink: