(http://www.mediaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Scott-Brown-new3-e1263335501770.jpg)
QuoteCosmopolitan dug through their archives to find a June 1982 issue featuring a very naked chap by the name of Scott Brown playing centerfold model. Flattering, in a certain light, but possibly problematic for Brown, who is running for Ted Kennedy's United States Senate seat in Massachusetts. "Vote for Brown. He Has One Hell of a Stimulus Package," the lady mag suggests as a slogan.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/republican-senate-candidate-scott-brown-posed-naked-in-cosmo/
At least his staff knew how to spell the name of the state. :razz:
What makes you think so? Did you see him in a spelling bee? Source, please.
I'd vote for him. :biggrin:
Party of morality my ass. I read this little tidbit elsewhere yesterday that was written by a woman whose avatar is a poster with the Republican elephant and the slogan, "Don't say we didn't warn you": "...i am confident that we can turn things around and stop this destruction of traditional american values. the people have spoken in jersey, virginia and now in massachusetts. the more shenanigans that the far leftists pull, the worse they will look and the more votes they will lose"
Her profile reveals that she has a dog kennel in Iowa and when you google the address, you get a link to the Iowa sex offenders registry which reveals that there is a Tier 2 sex offender (aggravated sexual assault of a child) registered at that same address. Traditional American values indeed. :rolleyes:
She lost get over it. :razz:
Quote from: LOsborne on January 21, 2010, 07:47:56 AM
What makes you think so? Did you see him in a spelling bee? Source, please.
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/01/nice-work-new-coakley-attack-ad-misspells-massachusetts/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QmyCyxD1lM&feature=related At the end of the video
Sweetie, I asked for the source that convinces you Brown can spell "Massachusetts," not for a video of an ad that shows Coakley's handlers can't.
The fact that her people can't spell, doesn't mean he (or his) can. This seems to be a common logical failing around this board. People assume that proving one party is wrong automatically makes the other party right. It doesn't. They could both have their heads so far up their butts they are blind, deaf and suffocating. Personally, I think this is the natural condition of the aberration known as "politician."
But I thought you had more discernment.
Sometimes we make those mistakes.
Quote from: LOsborne on January 21, 2010, 07:47:06 PM
Sweetie, I asked for the source that convinces you Brown can spell "Massachusetts," not for a video of an ad that shows Coakley's handlers can't.
The fact that her people can't spell, doesn't mean he (or his) can. This seems to be a common logical failing around this board. People assume that proving one party is wrong automatically makes the other party right. It doesn't. They could both have their heads so far up their butts they are blind, deaf and suffocating. Personally, I think this is the natural condition of the aberration known as "politician."
But I thought you had more discernment.
I don't see any of his ad's turning up with misspellings on them. :razz:
Quote from: LOsborne on January 21, 2010, 07:47:06 PM
Sweetie, I asked for the source that convinces you Brown can spell "Massachusetts," not for a video of an ad that shows Coakley's handlers can't.
The fact that her people can't spell, doesn't mean he (or his) can. This seems to be a common logical failing around this board. People assume that proving one party is wrong automatically makes the other party right. It doesn't. They could both have their heads so far up their butts they are blind, deaf and suffocating. Personally, I think this is the natural condition of the aberration known as "politician."
But I thought you had more discernment.
Your patience inspires me. ;D
Quote from: me on January 21, 2010, 08:20:50 PM
I don't see any of his ad's turning up with misspellings on them. :razz:
All this is is an indication of the level of focus, or lack thereof, of the individual checking the copy before printing. You get what you pay for. . . :razz:
Quote from: LOsborne on January 21, 2010, 07:47:56 AM
What makes you think so? Did you see him in a spelling bee? Source, please.
I didn't say him I said his staff.
Quote from: me on January 21, 2010, 08:20:50 PM
I don't see any of his ad's turning up with misspellings on them. :razz:
Whhhooooosshh!! That was sound of the point blasting over her head, without even ruffling her hair.
Ahem.
Sometimes we make these mistakes.
Quote from: LOsborne on January 22, 2010, 08:16:17 AM
Whhhooooosshh!! That was sound of the point blasting over her head, without even ruffling her hair.
No, I believe it was my point that slipped past ya'll's and ya still don't get it.
You go right on believing that.
Quote from: followsthewolf on January 22, 2010, 09:37:54 AM
Ahem.
Sometimes we make these mistakes.
Thank you for that "we," FTW. I solemnly swear I will attempt to make no more of the same kind.
And Sandy .... patience, my ass. From now on I will follow your lead instead of bashing my head on the keyboard.
Dammit, Ex, I lost that graphic AGAIN!
Lately making mistakes has become a ritual repeated with some regularity.
:yes: :yes: :yes: :biggrin:
I posted that because it was just as relevant to her performance as that pic taken long ago was to his. They are equally as stupid, silly, and irrelevant to the subject of the issues of job performance. It means nothing in the grand scheme of things.