Brian Williams scandal

[me]

Unlike you, I research things on my own.  Bill O'Reilly is a proven liar.  It's documented, captured on video in his own words, etc.

Here ya go Locutus
http://nation.foxnews.com/2015/02/20/bill-oreillys-talking-points-memo-22015-airing-tonight-8pm-et

[Exterminator]

You really need to quit believing everything you hear. 

You should take your own advice.

[me]

You should take your own advice.

Ya, I hear them saying what he "supposedly" said. Where's the proof? Ya better check out my link.

[Exterminator]

Ya, I hear them saying what he "supposedly" said. Where's the proof? Ya better check out my link.

Really; your source is a network that admits to manipulating the news for their agenda defending one of their own is your source?  What a gullible sheep!  You'd better wake up!

[me]

Really; your source is a network that admits to manipulating the news for their agenda defending one of their own is your source?  What a gullible sheep!  You'd better wake up!

That Mother Jones thing is a smear piece pure and simple. Go ahead and take their word for what he supposedly said rather than hear what he actually said but remember you are repeating a lie and you now own it.

[Exterminator]

That Mother Jones thing is a smear piece pure and simple. Go ahead and take their word for what he supposedly said rather than hear what he actually said but remember you are repeating a lie and you now own it.

And the CNN piece in which virtually everyone else who was there, from not only the same network O'Reilly was working for at the time but others as well, agrees that his account of the events is not true...also a smear piece?  Is this another of your big conspiracies where everyone has gathered to attack O'Reilly's credibility even though they have absolutely nothing to gain by doing so?

And what he said is what he said...he has said it on air, he has written about it.

Not that you're well known around here for your respect for the truth anyway...   

[me]

And the CNN piece in which virtually everyone else who was there, from not only the same network O'Reilly was working for at the time but others as well, agrees that his account of the events is not true...also a smear piece?  Is this another of your big conspiracies where everyone has gathered to attack O'Reilly's credibility even though they have absolutely nothing to gain by doing so?

And what he said is what he said...he has said it on air, he has written about it.

Not that you're well known around here for your respect for the truth anyway...   

That guy contradicted his own story about the gunfire so why should anyone believe him?

[Exterminator]

That guy contradicted his own story about the gunfire so why should anyone believe him?

What guy?  Have you bothered to read what O'Reilly himself said or are you so hell bent on defending him that you really just don't care what's true?

[me]

What guy?  Have you bothered to read what O'Reilly himself said or are you so hell bent on defending him that you really just don't care what's true?

Yes, I heard what he said and I also heard the "staffer" say he heard no gunfire working alongside O'Reilly and heard him change his story when confronted with the fact that the NY Times had said there was gunfire. Then he said gunfire over people's heads was different and didn't miss a beat.

[Palehorse]

Yes, I heard what he said and I also heard the "staffer" say he heard no gunfire working alongside O'Reilly and heard him change his story when confronted with the fact that the NY Times had said there was gunfire. Then he said gunfire over people's heads was different and didn't miss a beat.

He lied. He needs to resign his position immediately!

[me]

http://www.mediaite.com/online/corn-and-engberg-claims-about-oreilly-seem-politically-personally-motivated/

http://deadline.com/2015/02/bill-oreilly-cbs-news-video-falklands-war-mother-jones-video-1201379792/

[Exterminator]

You keep commenting on these two people and ignoring the facts.  O'Reilly has, many times, claimed that he was in a combat zone, even inferring that he was actually in the Falklands when he was nowhere near the place.  Now, to cover up those lies, he is trying to say that the, "riot," which actual footage reveals is nothing more than an angry demonstration, qualifies as combat and supports his claims of having been in a war zone.  Forget the people involved and concentrate only what O'Reilly, himself, has said and watch the video and then tell me that you still think his statements are valid.

2001: O'Reilly wrote in his book, "The No Spin Zone: Confrontations With the Powerful and Famous in America," that his time covering war made him ready for anything. "You know that I am not easily shocked," he wrote. "I've reported on the ground in active war zones from El Salvador to the Falkland Islands, and in chaotic situations like the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the Rodney King riots in Los Angeles."

2004: In his syndicated column, O'Reilly recalled how he had "survived a combat situation in Argentina during the Falklands War." He was presumably referring to a protest he covered in Buenos Aires, but his reference to a "combat situation" could reasonably be interpreted as a "war zone."

2008: Seven years ago on the "O'Reilly Factor," the host invoked his experience "in the war zones" to taunt Bill Moyers, the veteran journalist with whom he's feuded for years. "By the way, I missed Moyers in the war zones of the Falkland conflict in Argentina, the Middle East and Northern Ireland," O'Reilly said. "I looked for Bill, but I didn't see him."

2013: During an interview on his Fox News show, O'Reilly once again described the protest but said it took place "in a war zone in Argentina, in the Falklands."

"Because I was in a situation one time, in a war zone in Argentina, in the Falklands, where my photographer got run down and then hit his head and was bleeding from the ear on the concrete," O'Reilly told his guest.

[Henry Hawk]

O'Reilly is a political commentator, NOT the head anchor and chief editor of the NBC Nightly News!

If you don't like him, don't watch him.  You are comparing apples to oranges.  It is just sour grapes by liberals.

[me]

You keep commenting on these two people and ignoring the facts.  O'Reilly has, many times, claimed that he was in a combat zone, even inferring that he was actually in the Falklands when he was nowhere near the place.  Now, to cover up those lies, he is trying to say that the, "riot," which actual footage reveals is nothing more than an angry demonstration, qualifies as combat and supports his claims of having been in a war zone.  Forget the people involved and concentrate only what O'Reilly, himself, has said and watch the video and then tell me that you still think his statements are valid.

2001: O'Reilly wrote in his book, "The No Spin Zone: Confrontations With the Powerful and Famous in America," that his time covering war made him ready for anything. "You know that I am not easily shocked," he wrote. "I've reported on the ground in active war zones from El Salvador to the Falkland Islands, and in chaotic situations like the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the Rodney King riots in Los Angeles."

2004: In his syndicated column, O'Reilly recalled how he had "survived a combat situation in Argentina during the Falklands War." He was presumably referring to a protest he covered in Buenos Aires, but his reference to a "combat situation" could reasonably be interpreted as a "war zone."

2008: Seven years ago on the "O'Reilly Factor," the host invoked his experience "in the war zones" to taunt Bill Moyers, the veteran journalist with whom he's feuded for years. "By the way, I missed Moyers in the war zones of the Falkland conflict in Argentina, the Middle East and Northern Ireland," O'Reilly said. "I looked for Bill, but I didn't see him."

2013: During an interview on his Fox News show, O'Reilly once again described the protest but said it took place "in a war zone in Argentina, in the Falklands."

"Because I was in a situation one time, in a war zone in Argentina, in the Falklands, where my photographer got run down and then hit his head and was bleeding from the ear on the concrete," O'Reilly told his guest.

Didn't check out my links did ya? I think it may be a good idea if ya do. 

http://www.mediaite.com/online/corn-and-engberg-claims-about-oreilly-seem-politically-personally-motivated/

http://deadline.com/2015/02/bill-oreilly-cbs-news-video-falklands-war-mother-jones-video-1201379792/

[Palehorse]

O'Reilly is a political commentator, NOT the head anchor and chief editor of the NBC Nightly News!

If you don't like him, don't watch him.  You are comparing apples to oranges.  It is just sour grapes by liberals.

Yeah. . . I see how it works . . . 

Same theory surrounding faux news too!