Ol'Miss Doesn't Seem To Understand "NO"

[Sandy Eggo]

It's all in the programing HH. 

No, it's all in the ability to read and comprehend. If Henry's stance is as he stated it in his response to me in this  thread, then it has changed. Which is fine, but please be honest about it.

[Henry Hawk]

Yeah, it's not like you've bloviated about your thoughts on the subject a gazillion times or more. </sarcasm> Are you saying your position has changed since the last time the topic came up?

I have ALWAYS believed that abortions are wrong and always will be...........on a federal level, I am against any laws or notions of using taxpayers dollars for ANYTHING regarding Abortions.
I do not like the "pro-choice" stances of advocating for abortions.....If a woman wants one, then find a means of paying for it....through charities or other means than tax dollars.  I support programs that promote adoptions and such.

[me]

No, it's all in the ability to read and comprehend. If Henry's stance is as he stated it in his response to me in this  thread, then it has changed. Which is fine, but please be honest about it.

Most things said are right out of the play book of what to do if someone disagrees with a liberal.  I will repeat again, not everyone can or should agree on everything, it is not normal and will never happen.  All those who disagree with liberals have their beliefs just as liberals have theirs and they should be respected and the person who disagrees should not be called names, have words twisted around to make them sound like some sort of monsters, and be called racists or bigots.  Even those who change their minds and suddenly see the conservative point are subject to the same kind of thing as are blacks.  I invite you to stand on the outside and look in for a change and see the absurdity of it all. It is a pure and simple tactic to try to shame and brow beat the opposition into submission.  With some it may work but not for all by any means.

[The Troll]

If you are not a liberal, then you are automatically against old people, against SS, against medicare, are a racist, hate women's rights, .... this is without a doubt the most cliche' group of people I have ever seen.  It just like you said, they have been "programmed" to think a certain way.  They accuse those on the right of some of the most ridicules stuff, but they most not have any mirrors in their homes..because they are guilty of nearly EVERYTHING they accuse others of.

I'm sick of it all.

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_God_Complex

  Henry I was watch the program "TED" on the Science Channel.  There was a noted physicist who was giving a talk about the symptom that some doctors, college professors, CEO, millionaires and billionaires plus electronic geniuses and washed upped old hags.  It's called The God Complex.

  As he talked a large picture of  the Hawk and "ME" started appear on the TV screen.  It fit you the twin so well and so complete I now know what I am up a against when conversing with you two  people.  He when on to say you the twins weren't completely nuts, but that with your closed minds there was nothing anyone could do for you until you opened your mind that possibly you could be wrong.

  Since I have heard this lecture, I will not take you two so seriously again.  Sorry I jumped over you two so badly.  A mind is a terrible thing to lose.   

[Sandy Eggo]

Most things said are right out of the play book of what to do if someone disagrees with a liberal.  I will repeat again, not everyone can or should agree on everything, it is not normal and will never happen.  All those who disagree with liberals have their beliefs just as liberals have theirs and they should be respected and the person who disagrees should not be called names, have words twisted around to make them sound like some sort of monsters, and be called racists or bigots.  Even those who change their minds and suddenly see the conservative point are subject to the same kind of thing as are blacks.  I invite you to stand on the outside and look in for a change and see the absurdity of it all. It is a pure and simple tactic to try to shame and brow beat the opposition into submission.  With some it may work but not for all by any means.

I have NO idea what you're talking about.

[Locutus]

I have ALWAYS believed that abortions are wrong and always will be...........on a federal level, I am against any laws or notions of using taxpayers dollars for ANYTHING regarding Abortions.
I do not like the "pro-choice" stances of advocating for abortions.....If a woman wants one, then find a means of paying for it....through charities or other means than tax dollars.  I support programs that promote adoptions and such.

So which is a better use of your taxpayer dollars HH?  You can't have it both ways.  As has been pointed out numerous times around here, most people who don't want their taxpayer dollars funding abortions are the selfsame people who also don't want their taxpayer dollars going to fund welfare, food stamps, and the like for some of those same children you're so willing to "save" from being aborted.  I'm not sure how you reconcile the two. 

You may say that only people who can afford to have children should have them, but that isn't a valid argument.  As we both know, that hasn't been the case in the past, and there's no reason to believe it's going to be the case in the future.  So what's it going to be?   It seems far more appealing to the "fiscal conservative principles" that you ballyhoo all over the place to just go ahead and use the dollars to subsidize and/or fund the abortions.  It'll save you, your taxpayer dollars, and society in general, from funding the lifetimes support of these children.

What say you?  Pay now and be done with it, or pay for a lifetime of support?

[Locutus]

I have NO idea what you're talking about.

She probably doesn't either. 

[Sandy Eggo]

I have ALWAYS believed that abortions are wrong and always will be...........on a federal level, I am against any laws or notions of using taxpayers dollars for ANYTHING regarding Abortions.
I do not like the "pro-choice" stances of advocating for abortions.....If a woman wants one, then find a means of paying for it....through charities or other means than tax dollars.  I support programs that promote adoptions and such.

So you're not pro-choice and really don't know much about it.

[me]

Re: Ol'Miss Doesn't Seem To Understand "NO"
« Reply #30 on: Today at 11:46:47 AM »

ReplyQuote

Quote from: me on Today at 08:52:38 AM

    It's all in the programing HH. 

No, it's all in the ability to read and comprehend. If Henry's stance is as he stated it in his response to me in this  thread, then it has changed. Which is fine, but please be honest about it.
[/quote

Quote from: me on Today at 02:19:30 PM

    Most things said are right out of the play book of what to do if someone disagrees with a liberal.  I will repeat again, not everyone can or should agree on everything, it is not normal and will never happen.  All those who disagree with liberals have their beliefs just as liberals have theirs and they should be respected and the person who disagrees should not be called names, have words twisted around to make them sound like some sort of monsters, and be called racists or bigots.  Even those who change their minds and suddenly see the conservative point are subject to the same kind of thing as are blacks.  I invite you to stand on the outside and look in for a change and see the absurdity of it all. It is a pure and simple tactic to try to shame and brow beat the opposition into submission.  With some it may work but not for all by any means.

author=Sandy Eggo link=topic=18166.msg431758#msg431758 date=1333831257]
I have NO idea what you're talking about.

Of course you don't it isn't in your programing. 

[Locutus]

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_God_Complex

  Henry I was watch the program "TED" on the Science Channel.  There was a noted physicist who was giving a talk about the symptom that some doctors, college professors, CEO, millionaires and billionaires plus electronic geniuses and washed upped old hags.  It's called The God Complex.

  As he talked a large picture of  the Hawk and "ME" started appear on the TV screen.  It fit you the twin so well and so complete I now know what I am up a against when conversing with you two  people.  He when on to say you the twins weren't completely nuts, but that with your closed minds there was nothing anyone could do for you until you opened your mind that possibly you could be wrong.

  Since I have heard this lecture, I will not take you two so seriously again.  Sorry I jumped over you two so badly.  A mind is a terrible thing to lose.   

I think you meant to post the link to this one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_complex

[Exterminator]

...on a federal level, I am against any laws or notions of using taxpayers dollars for ANYTHING regarding Abortions.

And as I have pointed out previously, I am against paying for you to breed your hell-spawn vis-à-vis your being able to lower your tax liability by claiming them as dependents on your income taxes and sucking up my property tax dollars to pay for their schools!  Where are my rights?

[The Troll]

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_God_Complex

  Henry I was watch the program "TED" on the Science Channel.  There was a noted physicist who was giving a talk about the symptom that some doctors, college professors, CEO, millionaires and billionaires plus electronic geniuses and washed upped old hags.  It's called The God Complex.

  As he talked a large picture of  the Hawk and "ME" started appear on the TV screen.  It fit you the twin so well and so complete I now know what I am up a against when conversing with you two  people.  He when on to say you the twins weren't completely nuts, but that with your closed minds there was nothing anyone could do for you until you opened your mind that possibly you could be wrong.

  Since I have heard this lecture, I will not take you two so seriously again.  Sorry I jumped over you two so badly.  A mind is a terrible thing to lose.   

[The Troll]

I think you meant to post the link to this one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_complex

  Thanks Locutus, I don't know why I have such a problem with getting the right link address.  But like I said the Wikipedia definition of a person with the God Complex fit "ME" and Henry like a glove.  As I watch the lecture I just couldn't get over how it defined Henry and     Just like a glove.  But they are happy in their own mind.    It's to bad they didn't see it.    

[Sandy Eggo]

Re: Ol'Miss Doesn't Seem To Understand "NO"
« Reply #30 on: Today at 11:46:47 AM »

Of course you don't it isn't in your programing. 

Schizophrenic much?

[Exterminator]

The thing is...these clowns are anything but over-achievers.  They are, in fact, victims of those people and too stupid to know that the pain they're feeling is the shafting they're taking up the ass.  Apparently, they like it!