Democrats SUCK!!

[Moonglow]

your not really saying it, cause I can't hear u!

[followsthewolf]

They believed because they were so tired of the republican bullshit of the preceding years.

And now, look at the campaigns for republicans in 2010 -- campaigning for change.

Just like the democrats in '08.

What's different?

Nothing changes in the message -- the only difference is the party making the claims.

And they do that because.....

        BECAUSE THEY WANT TO GET ELECTED/RE-ELECTED.

None of them believe it -- and even if they did, they get swallowed up by the politics and bureaucracy of the atmosphere in DC.

History repeats, repeats, repeats, repeats..............

[me]

Pelosi is just the target presented to you by the opposition; the scapegoat being utilized to divert your attention from the fact that the REASON nothing is getting done is the nasty dark secret this country nurtures to this very day in many sectors; racism. It is the reason the republican party is stonewalling any legislation being put forth by the democrats. It is the reason Republicans play roulette with the benefits of the 4 million plus unemployed individuals in this country. And it is the reason this United States Citizen will NEVER vote republican again.

That being said, if you are silly enough to believe anything a congress-person says, surely you do not believe ANY congressional member could EVER accomplish such an idealistic goal in any given era?! 

PH when did it become racist to disagree with the administration?  If it has always been the case does that mean that blacks that disagreed with the Bush administration were racist? Why are the Dems constantly pulling the race card all of a sudden?  No one has answered that question to my satisfaction as yet.  That type of BS being spouted constantly by the dems is causing more unrest and doing more to divide people than anything.  There are blacks who disagree with his policies too so what does that make them?   

[Henry Hawk]

PH when did it become racist to disagree with the administration?  If it has always been the case does that mean that blacks that disagreed with the Bush administration were racist? Why are the Dems constantly pulling the race card all of a sudden?  No one has answered that question to my satisfaction as yet.  That type of BS being spouted constantly by the dems is causing more unrest and doing more to divide people than anything.  There are blacks who disagree with his policies too so what does that make them?   

You are 100% correct me!......That attitude RIGHT there is turning me extemely sour towards politics in general....THAT is about as much of a cheap shot and an unintellgent answer as I have EVER heard...that is left-wing politics at it's finest!!!...and it is PURE BULLSHIT!! ( I cannot think of a more appropriate word to use!!)...the left is doing more to divide this country than at any other point in history.....it SUCKS, and hence the name of this title.....DEMOCRATS SUCK!!!!

[Palehorse]

PH when did it become racist to disagree with the administration?  If it has always been the case does that mean that blacks that disagreed with the Bush administration were racist? Why are the Dems constantly pulling the race card all of a sudden?  No one has answered that question to my satisfaction as yet.  That type of BS being spouted constantly by the dems is causing more unrest and doing more to divide people than anything.  There are blacks who disagree with his policies too so what does that make them?

You are 100% correct me!......That attitude RIGHT there is turning me extemely sour towards politics in general....THAT is about as much of a cheap shot and an unintellgent answer as I have EVER heard...that is left-wing politics at it's finest!!!...and it is PURE BULLSHIT!! ( I cannot think of a more appropriate word to use!!)...the left is doing more to divide this country than at any other point in history.....it SUCKS, and hence the name of this title.....DEMOCRATS SUCK!!!!

Obama = 365   McCain = 173 http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/

Clearly a majority win in which the people made a choice to endorse change and yet before the man even took the oath of office the propaganda and opposition engaged, and continues to engage, in efforts to block anything this administration endorses or puts forth; all minus any logical explanation or spin free facts to support such actions.

What other reason(s) would motivate such a proliferation of "hate and malice" toward a POTUS even before he takes office? Had it been based upon his stated goals and objectives it would have negatively impacted the election results.

And the same individuals continuing to endorse and parrot the latest flavors of said opposition, steadfastly refuse to even consider objective and empirical evidence that proves their position is incorrect and biased!

I am saying the lion's share of the hate and malice is rooted in racial separatist positions. Minus any empirical evidence that validates otherwise, and when confronted with the illogical and non responsive tendency of the opposition to explain themselves and their purpose for such unreasonable proliferation of falsehoods, what else is left?

[Henry Hawk]

it is my belief, that many, many Americans, who dont' follow politics very closely, fell for the hyperbol of "change and hope"...and after 8 years of demonizing Bush and the republicans...(and some of it justifiable)...decided to vote.....I think they was severly mislead and misinformed.....I think people like Oprah, and the mainstream media, put Obama on a pedestal and thus we have this POTUS...and NOW his pop rating is at an all time low (around 42%)....people have decided that this is NOT the  hope and change they believed was going to happen.

I also think there was WAY too many hard headed conservatives who did not like McCain, so they did not vote in 08.....but I am certain you will see a different crowd at the polls from now on.....my opinion, nothing else.

[Palehorse]

it is my belief, that many, many Americans, who dont' follow politics very closely, fell for the hyperbol of "change and hope"...and after 8 years of demonizing Bush and the republicans...(and some of it justifiable)...decided to vote.....I think they was severly mislead and misinformed.....I think people like Oprah, and the mainstream media, put Obama on a pedestal and thus we have this POTUS...and NOW his pop rating is at an all time low (around 42%)....people have decided that this is NOT the  hope and change they believed was going to happen.

I also think there was WAY too many hard headed conservatives who did not like McCain, so they did not vote in 08.....but I am certain you will see a different crowd at the polls from now on.....my opinion, nothing else.

AND those very same "sheeple" are being led about by all of the FALSEHOODS and PROPAGANDA being spewed by the sour grapes crowd and bigotry infused zealots who harbor racial separatists.

[Henry Hawk]

AND those very same "sheeple" are being led about by all of the FALSEHOODS and PROPAGANDA being spewed by the sour grapes crowd and bigotry infused zealots who harbor racial separatists.

in YOUR opinion!!....I feel the exact same about many on the left.....exactly...

[me]

Obama = 365   McCain = 173 http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/

Clearly a majority win in which the people made a choice to endorse change and yet before the man even took the oath of office the propaganda and opposition engaged, and continues to engage, in efforts to block anything this administration endorses or puts forth; all minus any logical explanation or spin free facts to support such actions.

What other reason(s) would motivate such a proliferation of "hate and malice" toward a POTUS even before he takes office? Had it been based upon his stated goals and objectives it would have negatively impacted the election results.

And the same individuals continuing to endorse and parrot the latest flavors of said opposition, steadfastly refuse to even consider objective and empirical evidence that proves their position is incorrect and biased!

I am saying the lion's share of the hate and malice is rooted in racial separatist positions. Minus any empirical evidence that validates otherwise, and when confronted with the illogical and non responsive tendency of the opposition to explain themselves and their purpose for such unreasonable proliferation of falsehoods, what else is left?

Just because the majority voted for him does not mean those of us who didn't have to change our minds about liking his policies and it still does not make us racist and neither does it make those who have changed their minds about him since he took office racist, it just means they have changed their minds and have decided they don't like the job he's doing.  What is so hard to grasp about that?

I hate to say this but what I expect when we get closer to the next election is more of the same and telling people if they do not vote for Obama as president again they are being racist.  The Dems using that race card is getting real old. 

[Henry Hawk]

I hate to say this but what I expect when we get closer to the next election is more of the same and telling people if they do not vote for Obama as president again they are being racist.  The Dems using that race card is getting real old. 

I guarantee THAT will be their plan....

[Palehorse]

in YOUR opinion!!....I feel the exact same about many on the left.....exactly...

The difference being my position is supported by empirical evidence, (and before you ask for it I will say it located throughout this forum so do your homework or pay closer attention when it is being provided).

J
. . .
I hate to say this but what I expect when we get closer to the next election is more of the same and telling people if they do not vote for Obama as president again they are being racist.  The Dems using that race card is getting real old. 

"They" will not have to. You guys are doing a fine job all by yourselves.

[me]

The difference being my position is supported by empirical evidence, (and before you ask for it I will say it located throughout this forum so do your homework or pay closer attention when it is being provided).
"They" will not have to. You guys are doing a fine job all by yourselves.

Your "evidence" is the same old stuff that was used by other administrations before and it was never racist to disagree with it.  If it wasn't racist when Clinton and other dems were in office to disagree why is it now?  Don't use the same tired talking points use your words.  Just because something seems to work for one person doesn't mean everyone has to like it or that it works for them.  You may like socialism or progressive but I don't and neither do a lot of other people so we disagree on what they do and how they work and both have facts to back up our likes or dislikes of our opinions.  You don't accept ours and we don't accept yours and that makes us have different opinions and likes.  Being condescending, accusatory, name calling, and pulling the race card just to get others to agree is wrong, divisive, and serves no purpose whatsoever. 

[Palehorse]

Your "evidence" is the same old stuff that was used by other administrations before and it was never racist to disagree with it.  If it wasn't racist when Clinton and other dems were in office to disagree why is it now?  Don't use the same tired talking points use your words.  Just because something seems to work for one person doesn't mean everyone has to like it or that it works for them.  You may like socialism or progressive but I don't and neither do a lot of other people so we disagree on what they do and how they work and both have facts to back up our likes or dislikes of our opinions.  You don't accept ours and we don't accept yours and that makes us have different opinions and likes.  Being condescending, accusatory, name calling, and pulling the race card just to get others to agree is wrong, divisive, and serves no purpose whatsoever.

1. Show me where I am name calling. Using trendy categorization phrases is not name calling.
2. It is not the "same old stuff and talking points"
3. I'll just quote a friend in saying, "the truth will come out, just wait and see".

I just hope I am around long enough to be able to say "I told you so".

[me]

1. Show me where I am name calling. Using trendy categorization phrases is not name calling.
2. It is not the "same old stuff and talking points"
3. I'll just quote a friend in saying, "the truth will come out, just wait and see".

I just hope I am around long enough to be able to say "I told you so".

1. I wasn't meaning you in particular on the name calling but you do say we are being racist.

2. Yes, it is the same old stuff I hear everywhere every day by different people on the media.

3. Yes, the truth will come out of that I'm sure but who's truth will it be?

I would much prefer it's you saying "I told you so" than for us to be saying it.

You didn't answer the one big question,

Quote from: me on Today at 02:57:05 PM

    Your "evidence" is the same old stuff that was used by other administrations before and it was never racist to disagree with it. If it wasn't racist when Clinton and other dems were in office to disagree why is it now?  Don't use the same tired talking points use your words.  Just because something seems to work for one person doesn't mean everyone has to like it or that it works for them.  You may like socialism or progressive but I don't and neither do a lot of other people so we disagree on what they do and how they work and both have facts to back up our likes or dislikes of our opinions.  You don't accept ours and we don't accept yours and that makes us have different opinions and likes.  Being condescending, accusatory, name calling, and pulling the race card just to get others to agree is wrong, divisive, and serves no purpose whatsoever.

[The Troll]

I don't believe, but unfortunatly way too many people DID back in 2006....and you are so wrong about the next election and like I have said, TIME will tell the truth!!!..and one thing I am sure of, there will NOT be as many democrats in office this fall...

and please don't fall for the "racism" bullshit...THAT is clearly the liberals plan to do, is make this a race issue in 2010....

THEY SUCK!! and suck BAD!!......

THAT feel's so goood to say...   (becasue it is TRUE)

Henry, I have read all of your posts up to and including this post.  Henry what you have said is the most convoluted and mentally deranged posting that you have ever made.

   I wondered what had happened to you this week, you seem to have been missing, after you was made to look so stupid last week.  Now, I know why, you just got out of the mental hospital.  to much.  Or did your Homophobic an Racist thinking get the best of you.  Somebody please say Amen!

  For weeks, I have been trying think of just were you were coming from.  You're not really a Republican, the're greedy meatheads.  You're not a Libertarian, their for letting the rich get richer and the expense of the working man,  because even they are not as far out as you. 

  Your a ANARCHIST! "Anarchism, the theory that all forms of government are incompatible with individual and social liberty and should be abolished.

  I have never seen anyone so full of hate and stupidity, except the Nazi's against the Jews. 

  God loving, God fearing, Jesus love man, my ass. 

The Troll, Democrat, Liberal and a American loving Sonvabitch