Democrats SUCK!!

[The Troll]

What ever skippy.  I'll tell Troll not to bother feeling sorry for you.

  I don't know wither you will take it from the Troll.  But when it comes to "ME", I got your back Buddy.   

[Sandy Eggo]

In that case you check the notes and see what was used to back up the revision you don't just take it for granted that the revision is correct.

I think this would be the most logical thing to do first edition or not.

Based on the lack of effort you put into fact-checking your sources here, I find it hard to believe that you'd put any more effort into doing it at the library.

[Palehorse]

. . .
Based on the lack of effort you put into fact-checking your sources here, I find it hard to believe that you'd put any more effort into doing it at the library.

Hell, she's already said she will not during the aftermath of the last Obama Trashing Initiative she undertook.

I went to great lengths to back up a claim because I couldn't find what I needed on the net because it had been removed and I was given a load of crap because I didn't quote from memory exactly what was said, I was off by a word or two, and I will not do it again.  I will continue to post what I post if I'm satisfied it is correct and won't go to those lengths again to back it up even though I could.  I just don't have the time for it.  Like I said you all should start researching at the library and check out the first edition books, not the revised ones, and figure things out for yourselves.  After all that's the way it was done before computers where things get changed and removed.  When you google you only get what some want you to see and not necessarily the truth.

My missing a year, well in one case quite a few years, or a word does not change the basic fact of what I said Olias so don't even start.  Now that I think about it I never stated a year on the grape thing I just stated they couldn't grow them for a period of time, which was correct as I proved but I will not go digging for the post so, like I said Olias, don't even go there.

[Locutus]

I'm still trying to figure out what the hell she's talking about when she references revised vs. unrevised books.  What specifically was found that the library in an unrevised form that was found revised elsewhere?  I think she mentioned it before, but I hope it's not the birth certificate thing. 

[me]

The birth certificate thing is a moot point since Obama is already president and if they truly did find out the one he gave was a fake there would be nothing that could be done about it so they all need to forget it and let it go. 
As for revised edition books, including audio tapes, in the revised edition of Obama's book there is no mention of the drug use and skipping school, it has been changed and that part is gone now.  It follows the tape to a point and when it comes to that part it's different for a few paragraphs then picks back up with the tape.  I really can't say the 2nd edition is a true revised edition it is a 2nd printing though and not the one that came out originally as opposed to a truly "revised" edition.  It does not state that it has been revised so a person who hasn't seen the original wouldn't know there was any difference.   That's why I stress 1st editions as opposed to 2nd or later printings.  Any reference to it has also been removed from searches on the net.  Some things about Hillary and Bill Clinton had been changed regarding what happened with that cash and papers being found in the trunk of the car in the junk yard and also about what happened to the guy who found it. 

I'm not saying it is only one party that does this I'm saying it is done to make things look either worse or better than they actually were or even hide some things.  The further back in history you go the easier it is because there is no one around to dispute it.   

[The Troll]

  Jesus Christ "ME" give it up.  With post like this only show other people what a fool you are.  Your endless hope that you will find some thing to be proud of is a work of futility.   

[me]

  Jesus Christ "ME" give it up.  With post like this only show other people what a fool you are.  Your endless hope that you will find some thing to be proud of is a work of futility.   

Well good evening to you too Troll.  I could care less what you think.

[The Troll]

Well good evening to you too Troll.  I could care less what you think.

  I know and I thank you for noticing that I feel the same way about you.   But I do know one thing.  They could take a 100 oxen and try to pull you to the river of knowledge for a drink of it and you still wouldn't drink of it.  Why.  You not that bright or interested in having any knowledge.  Plum Dumb. 

[me]

Oopsie, what's this from a liberal leaning publications??

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/08/19/niall-ferguson-on-why-barack-obama-needs-to-go.html

[The Troll]

Oopsie, what's this from a liberal leaning publications??

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/08/19/niall-ferguson-on-why-barack-obama-needs-to-go.html

  Talking out of your big fat ass again.  I quit taking New Week be cause it was so Republican bias and who in hell is Niall Ferguson.  He a British Historian what in hell does he know, nothing. 

  Paul Krugman the Nobel Prize winning Princeton economics professor said that Ferguson is a lair and New Week needs to redo his article.   

  Where do you come up with this shit.  Do a little research, Niall Fergeson and you are just plain liars.  Dumbo. 

[Henry Hawk]

Me, I do believe you touched a nerve there on Mr. Troll......

[me]

Me, I do believe you touched a nerve there on Mr. Troll......

I think you might just be right about that.

[The Troll]

Me, I do believe you touched a nerve there on Mr. Troll......

  Hit a nerve, a fair mind person has the right to call out a liar.  "me" puts out this shit as if it is the truth.  She would know the truth if it smacked her in the face with a 14 inch skillet.   

  Mr. Niall the British Historian was John McCain advisor during his failed campaign and pledge his allegiance to Mitt Romney.  How in hell can you say he would tell the truth about Obama.

  You damn Republican can't find anything bad about Obama so you make up lies and phony thing to say about him.  Stay out of the woods Henry, the squirrels are storing nut for the winter.   

  Two questions, how many kinds of rape are there and where is Mitt Romney tax records.  I know of one rape.  The rape of this country if Romney and Medicare rapist Paul Ryan are elected.   

[me]

  Hit a nerve, a fair mind person has the right to call out a liar.  "me" puts out this shit as if it is the truth.  She would know the truth if it smacked her in the face with a 14 inch skillet.   

  Mr. Niall the British Historian was John McCain advisor during his failed campaign and pledge his allegiance to Mitt Romney.  How in hell can you say he would tell the truth about Obama.

  You damn Republican can't find anything bad about Obama so you make up lies and phony thing to say about him.  Stay out of the woods Henry, the squirrels are storing nut for the winter.   

  Two questions, how many kinds of rape are there and where is Mitt Romney tax records.  I know of one rape.  The rape of this country if Romney and Medicare rapist Paul Ryan are elected.   

Hum, looks like Obama on that cover to me and it darn sure looks like a mostly left wing publication too. 

[The Troll]

Hum, looks like Obama on that cover to me and it darn sure looks like a mostly left wing publication too.

    Calling New Week a Liberal magazine in like calling you the smartest women in the Universe.  Cupcake.