Global Warming

[Henry Hawk]

crap!  I did it again! NOW, I am through.   

[Bo D]

crap!  I did it again! NOW, I am through.   

Yeah, you just keep ....

[Henry Hawk]

I am out of control!!! 

I need help!



now I am through...

[me]

ecol·o·gy
noun \i-ˈkä-lə-jē, e-\

: a science that deals with the relationships between groups of living things and their environments

: the relationships between a group of living things and their environment
plural ecol·o·gies
Full Definition of ECOLOGY
1
:  a branch of science concerned with the interrelationship of organisms and their environments
2
:  the totality or pattern of relations between organisms and their environment
3
:  human ecology
4
:  environment, climate <the moral ecology>; also :  an often delicate or intricate system or complex <the ecology of language>
— eco·log·i·cal also eco·log·ic adjective
— eco·log·i·cal·ly adverb
— ecol·o·gist noun
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ecology

[Exterminator]

stu·pid·i·ty noun \stu-pi-də-tē\

: the state of being foolish or unintelligent : the condition of being stupid

[Locutus]

stu·pid·i·ty noun \stu-pi-də-tē\

: the state of being foolish or unintelligent : the condition of being stupid

 

[me]

If he was so smart and qualified that he was taken in by the greens why are they trashing him now?  Just because he no longer agrees with them doesn't make him any less intelligent it just means he has found evidence to the contrary and is no longer in agreement with them. He quit them they didn't get rid of him. 

[Exterminator]

I'm not sure how many times people would have to point out that a) he is not credible because he now works for people with a monetary interest in denying climate change, and, b) that he is not credible because he is not a climatologist (no, ecology is not the same thing at all and ignorance of the difference doesn't change that) before it sinks in that his opinion makes absolutely no difference whatsoever?

[Henry Hawk]

[Henry Hawk]

Niagra falls frozen...

[me]

I'm not sure how many times people would have to point out that a) he is not credible because he now works for people with a monetary interest in denying climate change, and, b) that he is not credible because he is not a climatologist (no, ecology is not the same thing at all and ignorance of the difference doesn't change that) before it sinks in that his opinion makes absolutely no difference whatsoever?

If he was credible when working with the greens he's just as credible now.  Sorry, your reasoning just doesn't get it.  You did not explain how he could be credible on one side and not the other.   

[Exterminator]

If he was credible when working with the greens he's just as credible now.  Sorry, your reasoning just doesn't get it.  You did not explain how he could be credible on one side and not the other.

Using that logic, if he was trustworthy as a teacher before, he must be trustworthy as a teacher now.

And Moore was never credible on issues of climate change.

[Exterminator]

Go back to sleep, sheeple.

[me]

Using that logic, if he was trustworthy as a teacher before, he must be trustworthy as a teacher now.

And Moore was never credible on issues of climate change.

Greenpeace

According to Greenpeace: How a Group of Ecologists, Journalists, and Visionaries Changed the World by Rex Wyler, the Don't Make a Wave Committee was formed in January 1970 by Dorothy and Irving Stowe, Ben Metcalfe, Marie and Jim Bohlen, Paul Cote, and Bob Hunter and incorporated in October 1970.[6] The Committee had formed to plan opposition to the testing of a one megaton hydrogen bomb in 1969 by the United States Atomic Energy Commission on Amchitka Island in the Aleutians. Moore joined the committee in 1971 and, as Greenpeace co-founder Bob Hunter wrote, "Moore was quickly accepted into the inner circle on the basis of his scientific background, his reputation [as an environmental activist], and his ability to inject practical, no-nonsense insights into the discussions."

[Exterminator]

Still can't quite grasp the concept: can you?