http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=P5p70YbRiPw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=P5p70YbRiPw)
Quote from: Henry Hawk on April 09, 2012, 10:38:43 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=P5p70YbRiPw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=P5p70YbRiPw)
If this person voted, that person would be guilty of voter fraud and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Just more Republican bullshit. :rolleyes:
Quote from: The Troll on April 09, 2012, 02:05:51 PM
If this person voted, that person would be guilty of voter fraud and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Just more Republican bullshit. :rolleyes:
He didn't vote.....but the poll worker was all set to give it to him.....NO bullshit at all. Go back and watch it...all the guy did was ask if there was an "Eric Holder"....and he gave an address. Why should he be prosecuted Troll? He committed NO crime. This is WHY we need voter ID.
Try watching the WHOLE thing troll....it is kind of funny, he said he would feel better IF he should his ID...and he would go get it from his car....he said I will be back faster than you can say furious....(regarding the fast and furious incident Holder is involved with)
The only Bullshit is that there SHOULD be voter ID....anybody, apparently can just walk up to a precint...and as long as they can use someones name and address from that precint they can vote. THATis BULLSHIT. Democrat Bullshit I might add.
Quote from: The Troll on April 09, 2012, 02:05:51 PM
If this person voted, that person would be guilty of voter fraud and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Just more Republican bullshit. :rolleyes:
The only bullshit I see here is the fact that if he could do it then others could who did vote illegally. They also could have gotten by with voting multiple times at different places under different names and no one would have been the wiser. That was made to prove a point and I think it showed Eric Holder up as being in denial about what is going on, either that or the dems are the one's who benefit from it happening so they aren't about to take measures to get it stopped.
James O'Keefe
I still don't see the big problem with requiring an ID to vote since you have to have one for almost everything you do anyway. Sure does distract people from the more serious issues going on though doesn't it? :wink:
Quote from: me on April 09, 2012, 05:43:08 PM
I still don't see the big problem with requiring an ID to vote since you have to have one for almost everything you do anyway. Sure does distract people from the more serious issues going on though doesn't it? :wink:
Just the God Complex bullshit. :rolleyes:
Quote from: The Troll on April 09, 2012, 07:17:24 PM
Just the God Complex bullshit. :rolleyes:
Just typical "I don't have any valid response so this is what I need to say" to be a good little sheeple.
Quote from: me on April 09, 2012, 07:30:33 PM
Just typical "I don't have any valid response so this is what I need to say" to be a good little sheeple.
:nocomment: Dumb ass! :grin2:
Quote from: The Troll on April 09, 2012, 07:55:28 PM
:nocomment: Dumb ass! :grin2:
I'm a dumb ass?????? Ok wise guy suppose someone is in a wreck or something happens to them while they're alone and they have no ID. How do they identify them to contact next of kin or look up medical info? If it's not a picture ID how do they know for sure you aren't carrying a false ID with a false address? A person should have one anyway so what's the big deal about requiring one to vote?
Quote from: me on April 09, 2012, 08:35:22 PM
I'm a dumb ass?????? Ok wise guy suppose someone is in a wreck or something happens to them while they're alone and they have no ID. How do they identify them to contact next of kin or look up medical info? If it's not a picture ID how do they know for sure you aren't carrying a false ID with a false address? A person should have one anyway so what's the big deal about requiring one to vote?
Just a plain stupid premise. :wacko:
Quote from: The Troll on April 09, 2012, 09:50:58 PM
Just a plain stupid premise. :wacko:
Another way to look at it is if they don't have a picture ID they can't get food stamps, welfare, bank account, cash a check, purchase liquor, or buy cigarettes under a certain age, so I guess there can't be that many people who really need a picture ID. Ya, it's no big deal. :rolleyes:
Now it may make it a little hard on the illegal's though to implement a picture ID requirement 'cause they may have a problem faking them. But wait, they shouldn't be voting here anyway they aren't citizens.
:zoners: :trustme:
Makes one wonder what we ever did before they started putting pictures on drivers licenses doesn't it?
Quote from: Palehorse on April 09, 2012, 10:38:33 PM
Makes one wonder what we ever did before they started putting pictures on drivers licenses doesn't it?
I recall having to show two forms of ID to write a check at the grocery store, just without the picture. It was usually my driver license, and a major credit card. But then again, that was in the days when they could still write your whole credit card number on the back of a check just to show what forms of ID they used to identify you. Times have certainly changed.
Quote from: Palehorse on April 09, 2012, 10:38:33 PM
Makes one wonder what we ever did before they started putting pictures on drivers licenses doesn't it?
Or before they started needing picture ID's for almost everything else you do.
I think moral values at one time MEANT something....it has eradicated over the years.
This video CLEARLY demonstrates as to WHY we need a voter ID....the integrity of our voting system is at stake. This should not be a democrat/republican issue....it is an American issue.
One person, One vote. Though this is not the complete answer......This would help.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on April 10, 2012, 08:27:51 AM
....the integrity of our voting system is at stake.
For many reasons; letting illiterate half-wits vote being another big one. :icon_twisted:
Quote from: Exterminator on April 10, 2012, 08:33:45 AM
For many reasons; letting illiterate half-wits vote being another big one. :icon_twisted:
That would take care of about all of the Tea Party. The old Tea Baggers. :rotfl: :rotfl:
Quote from: Palehorse on April 09, 2012, 04:08:49 PM
James O'Keefe
This individual is renowned for his deceitful methods in obtaining "videos" demonstrating things he views as wrong.
If there's anything wrong in that video it is the impression it leaves via its deceitful creation. Most who have had occasion to review his work have concluded that, like Breitbart, he heavily edits the content and leaves the truth on the cutting room floor.
Quote from: Palehorse on April 10, 2012, 11:58:18 AM
This individual is renowned for his deceitful methods in obtaining "videos" demonstrating things he views as wrong.
If there's anything wrong in that video it is the impression it leaves via its deceitful creation. Most who have had occasion to review his work have concluded that, like Breitbart, he heavily edits the content and leaves the truth on the cutting room floor.
Isn't he the federal felon arrested of pulling a stunt on a congresswoman in her Washington office. :wink: :biggrin:
Quote from: The Troll on April 10, 2012, 12:29:50 PM
Isn't he the federal felon arrested of pulling a stunt on a congresswoman in her Washington office. :wink: :biggrin:
He gained national attention for his release of video recordings of workers at ACORN offices in 2009, his arrest in early 2010 at the office of Senator Mary Landrieu in a failed attempt to record staff conversations, and release of videos of NPR executives in 2011. Investigations by both legal authorities and journalists have found O'Keefe has "selectively", "heavily" or "deceptively" edited secretly recorded videos to leave a false impression and present the subjects in the worst possible light.
Quote from: Palehorse on April 10, 2012, 12:34:24 PM
He gained national attention for his release of video recordings of workers at ACORN offices in 2009, his arrest in early 2010 at the office of Senator Mary Landrieu in a failed attempt to record staff conversations, and release of videos of NPR executives in 2011. Investigations by both legal authorities and journalists have found O'Keefe has "selectively", "heavily" or "deceptively" edited secretly recorded videos to leave a false impression and present the subjects in the worst possible light.
Another off the wall crazy Republican. :wink: :biggrin: :zoners: