Coats and Ellsworth "debated" in last night. Along with a lady named Sink-Burris, who appeared to be the only one of the three who had left adolescence behind.
http://www.courierpress.com/news/2010/oct/11/candidates-trade-personal-barbs/
Both men took turns ignoring the question on the table, instead trading accusations about past actions, and spending the time they should have been addressing the issues answering the slams.
How can I choose my candidate when they won't tell me what they plan to do, and why? All any of them will talk about is what a scummy, bottom-feeding POS his opponent is. If they are both pond-scum, why are these our candidates?
I agree, that is why I have like the Tea Party movement, they are some fresh, new faces to this whole scene.
Oh yes and they've done an excellent job of telling us why they're a better choice. </sarcasm>
Quote from: Henry Hawk on October 12, 2010, 08:31:25 AM
I agree, that is why I have like the Tea Party movement, they are some fresh, new faces to this whole scene.
Just because "Saw" has a new Leatherface in each of the movies does not automatically make the movie better.
I just wish that the "fresh, new faces" had a brain among them, collectively.
Quote from: followsthewolf on October 12, 2010, 10:12:34 AM
I just wish that the "fresh, new faces" had a brain among them, collectively.
Maybe they concentrate on the faces, so we won't notice they all wear slip-on shoes. I'm not sure if they find laces controversial, or if the mechanics of tying bows are too complicated.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on October 12, 2010, 08:31:25 AM
I agree, that is why I have like the Tea Party movement, they are some fresh, new faces to this whole scene.
Oh, I agree that the Tea Party has some fresh, new faces and are total whack jobs. Totally out of their minds. Want waitress and waiters to work for just tips. Doing away with the minimum wage, Social Security and Medicare and on and on and on.
Give America a break and DON'T VOTE FOR THEM!