Report Says Berger Hid Archive Documents
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061221/D8M4TNQ80.html (http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061221/D8M4TNQ80.html)
The guy STOLE documents.....I cannot believe that this is not a bigger deal than it is.....HE STOLE Documents from the National Archives...he admitted it and he gets a pass for the most part from the media....if this was a scooter libby...it would be headline news around the world....
AW, yer jest Jealous, Hawkster.
Sheeeet.
Stealin' sumthin' is tiny rat turds next to the crap piles that have be defecated lately.
Dang. Stealin' is now just about honorable next to the immorality we've seen pouring out of that cesspool called Congress.
ah reckon sow.... :confused: :yes:
Seriously......does nobody really care? HE STOLE shit and put it in his underware and walked out.....
cricket....cricket...
:confused:
Stealing is a serious crime.
Thousands dead trumps stealing every time.
And, probably, those in Washington who wish to spend lots of time examining the crime are less appalled by the crime than they are interested in diverting attention from the very length and extremely odious list of much more current transgressions of which we are becoming aware.
hmmmm.....let me see...................whatEverrr...
HE STOLE DOCUMENTS FROM THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES......
I'm not saying that DC needs to close down, but damn.....He F'n Stole Documents From The National Archives....and it's like last page news.....
If this would be anybody on the Republican side of things.....Katie Couric would be wet in the panties talkin about this one....Matt Laurer would be sportin some wood.....
ah F' it....... ;D....I need a drink!
Henry, there is so much other stuff that has happened lately that is so much bigger by comparison, we are about all numb to whatever sh!t that can happen.
Stealing from the archives is nothing compared to a president that refers to the Constitution as that "goddamned piece of paper."
Forgive me if I'm not "sportin' wood" over a theft.
And, no, I don't think I'll ever get over a President of the United States treating the Constitution like that. EVER.
Violating rights in a cavalier fashion, lying out his a$$.
Congressmen and Senators committing all manner of immoral acts.......
Aw, forget it. I need a drink.
Then drinks for everyone! On me! :biggrin:
Quote from: followsthewolf on December 22, 2006, 02:19:31 PM
Henry, there is so much other stuff that has happened lately that is so much bigger by comparison, we are about all numb to whatever sh!t that can happen.
Stealing from the archives is nothing compared to a president that refers to the Constitution as that "goddamned piece of paper."
Forgive me if I'm not "sportin' wood" over a theft.
And, no, I don't think I'll ever get over a President of the United States treating the Constitution like that. EVER.
Violating rights in a cavalier fashion, lying out his a$$.
Congressmen and Senators committing all manner of immoral acts.......
Aw, forget it. I need a drink.
Bullcrap....it's the same ole crap that was done during the Clinton admin....you just did not hear about it like you do on Bush's Clock...
Clinton was as crooked as any politician there was....Congressmen was just as immoral....we was screamin back then upon deaf ears....
he sold us out to China like a whore in a naval port...he lied through his teeth....
I'm sick to death of the media....
I'm not tryin to get in a pissin match on which prez was the worst....
My point is...IF this at this very time right now....was a repulican instead of Sandy Berger....It would be headline news.....and the is a fact.
Now.....let's take Sunny up on those drinks...
REALLY??? :confused:
Quote from: Henry Hawk on December 22, 2006, 03:05:15 PM
Bullcrap....it's the same ole crap that was done during the Clinton admin....
I'm not tryin to get in a pissin match on which prez was the worst....
friggin' poetic. poopiehead.
but seriously WHAT??????
Look at the documents that are missing. There was something in the Millennium bomber file that he wanted hid, to protect Clinton.
The millennium bomber was Clinton's barber's cousin's brother-in-law's third cousin, twice removed.
So the file was.
Twice removed, that is.
Shew.
Quote from: Tony Light on December 30, 2006, 02:41:55 PM
Look at the documents that are missing. There was something in the Millennium bomber file that he wanted hid, to protect Clinton.
of course you can prove that...
Quote from: awol on December 30, 2006, 11:21:58 PM
of course you can prove that...
What are the odds he can prove it?
Another red herring.
A not-so-veiled allusion that Clinton was in league with the bomber.
That's why I posted this sarcasm:
Quote from: followsthewolf on December 30, 2006, 05:36:25 PM
The millennium bomber was Clinton's barber's cousin's brother-in-law's third cousin, twice removed.
So the file was.
Twice removed, that is.
Shew.
Quoteit's the same ole crap that was done during the Clinton admin....you just did not hear about it like you do on Bush's Clock...
That's cause Clinton was a smart fella. He diverted attention away from "the same ole crap" by lettin' an intern lick his genitals in the oval orifice. He played the media like a high dollar hooker at an ag expo...or somethin'.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JoelMowbray/2007/01/09/how_sandy_berger_stole_state_secrets,_destroyed_evidence__got_off (http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JoelMowbray/2007/01/09/how_sandy_berger_stole_state_secrets,_destroyed_evidence__got_off)
This really bugs me....
http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/news/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=4 (http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/news/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=4)
"We now know that Mr. Berger left stolen highly classified documents at a construction site to avoid detection. We know that Mr. Berger insisted on privacy at times to allow him to conceal documents that he stole. One witness with a very high security clearance believed he saw Berger concealing documents in his socks.
"The Justice Department's assertion that Mr. Berger's statements are credible after being caught is misplaced. One wouldn't rely on the fox to be truthful after being nabbed in the hen house. But the Justice Department apparently did."
:razz:
do you know how hard it is to take this crap seriously from someone who has been touting "no conviction - no foul" about the felon-in-chief for the last 6 years?