(http://img.wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/foxnewsscrewup.jpg)
http://wonkette.com/412653/something-is-wrong-when-81-of-fox-newsers-are-voting-yes-to-this-question
How about you checking your sources before you post...
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/12/10/obama-ready-nobel-peace-prize/
checking the sources or not......the answers themselves are just wrong. They are reversed. The reason posted for yes or no....are reversed. Yes ....compared to so and so he does not deserve it? No....he does deserve it? Those are definitely backwards. Either that or it's too early in the morning.
Is that the best you can do, me? ;D
Yeah, the big 1% mistake makes a lot of difference in the reliability of my source. <sarcasm> :biggrin:
The point still remains that Faux posted it incorrectly and a large percentage of idiots voted "yes".
It is too early on a Saturday to comprehend. I had to read those answers a few times and then realized that they were written poorly. Figures!
Sheeple!
And I only had to read it once to realize that they changed it to suit their story. :razz:
Quote from: me on December 12, 2009, 10:28:51 AM
And I only had to read it once to realize that they changed it to suit their story. :razz:
Then you may wanna read it again. Nothing was changed.
Quote from: pariann on December 12, 2009, 06:45:30 AM
checking the sources or not......the answers themselves are just wrong. They are reversed. The reason posted for yes or no....are reversed. Yes ....compared to so and so he does not deserve it? No....he does deserve it? Those are definitely backwards. Either that or it's too early in the morning.
That would be typical Fux Gnus. They twist the truth into a lie, and just outright lie the rest of the time.
they did not post it incorrectly....that was from your whacky liberal web site, you dicked around with the poll, if you cannot see this, then we got issues... :rolleyes:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/12/10/obama-ready-nobel-peace-prize/
Um, you might want to check my link.
Quote from: me on December 12, 2009, 11:19:37 AM
Um, you might want to check my link.
I did....I don't see the problem here? http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/12/10/obama-ready-nobel-peace-prize/
Quote from: Henry Hawk on December 12, 2009, 11:18:07 AM
they did not post it incorrectly....that was from your whacky liberal web site, you dicked around with the poll, if you cannot see this, then we got issues... :rolleyes:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/12/10/obama-ready-nobel-peace-prize/
Did you really say that I "dicked" around with something? Wow, teach that as acceptable behavior at Sunday School do they?
Uh do you think they might have fixed AFTER a liberal pointed out to them what dolts they are? :biggrin:
Are you really that gullible?
Quote from: Sandy Eggo on December 12, 2009, 11:30:45 AM
Did you really say that I "dicked" around with something? Wow, teach that as acceptable behavior at Sunday School do they?
Uh do you think they might have fixed AFTER a liberal pointed out to them what dolts they are? :biggrin:
Are you really that gullible?
He wasn't saying you did it's your source that did. You forget I belong to the site and the poll was never posted like your rag is saying.
Quote from: Sandy Eggo on December 12, 2009, 11:30:45 AM
Did you really say that I "dicked" around with something? Wow, teach that as acceptable behavior at Sunday School do they?
Uh do you think they might have fixed AFTER a liberal pointed out to them what dolts they are? :biggrin:
Are you really that gullible?
that is not they way I meant it Sandy....and for whatever reason, I cannot modify to correct it, either.
It SHOULD have been THEY instead of YOU....I also do not remember entering this that way either....
I do believe that this never happened, because IF you read the comments AFTER this poll, NOTHING was mentioned about it.....I think it is YOU that is being gullible to think otherwise....but, THAT is the way MOST of the media and the liberals are...blame FOX for everything, but the mainstream media is the ones who are NOT reporting the news....just like THEY have completely failed to mention anything about the global warming scandal.. tsk, tsk...
Quote from: me on December 12, 2009, 11:53:14 AM
He wasn't saying you did it's your source that did. You forget I belong to the site and the poll was never posted like your rag is saying.
Even if you do belong to the site, you can't catch everything or you're lying, because it was.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/10/this-day-in-fox-news-poll_n_387908.html
Quote from: Henry Hawk on December 12, 2009, 01:41:56 PM
that is not they way I meant it Sandy....and for whatever reason, I cannot modify to correct it, either.
It SHOULD have been THEY instead of YOU....I also do not remember entering this that way either....
I do believe that this never happened, because IF you read the comments AFTER this poll, NOTHING was mentioned about it.....I think it is YOU that is being gullible to think otherwise....but, THAT is the way MOST of the media and the liberals are...blame FOX for everything, but the mainstream media is the ones who are NOT reporting the news....just like THEY have completely failed to mention anything about the global warming scandal.. tsk, tsk...
You are indeed gullible if you think that Fox can't make a mistake and numbskulls would vote w/out paying attention.
Oh and BTW, if they're dumb enough to vote in the first place when the poll was still wrong, then I doubt they would have said anything about it being wrong. :wink:
Quote from: Sandy Eggo on December 12, 2009, 02:04:41 PM
You are indeed gullible if you think that Fox can't make a mistake and numbskulls would vote w/out paying attention.
And you are indeed gullible if you believe anything those rags say. I'll bet you take everything the National Enquirer prints as gospel too. :rolleyes:
Quote from: me on December 12, 2009, 02:15:42 PM
And you are indeed gullible if you believe anything those rags say. I'll bet you take everything the National Enquirer prints as gospel too. :rolleyes:
It's a screen-shot Brainiac :rolleyes:
If you have something which proves that the poll wasn't initally posted incorrectly or the screen shot has been altered, then tote it on out here, until then we're an an impasse.
Quote from: Sandy Eggo on December 12, 2009, 02:09:26 PM
Oh and BTW, if they're dumb enough to vote in the first place when the poll was still wrong, then I doubt they would have said anything about it being wrong. :wink:
what is the mater with you liberals....?
I know you HATE conservatives...and Like to think that you are superior over them....but dang, Sandy, do you honestly think 81% of them would do this?...c'mon, I don't even think liberal trash would be that stupid...
THIS is typical left wing propaganda, I see it ALL the time....be realistic and NOT quites so gullible will ya... ;D
Me, have you noticed how the liberals ALWAYS get nasty when they are called out?...they ALWAYS start with the name calling....such as Brainiac....or moron, douche' bag, and Dan ALWAYS has a great vocabulary for those who he dislikes.....cracks me up... :yes: ;D
Quote from: Henry Hawk on December 12, 2009, 02:42:45 PM
Me, have you noticed how the liberals ALWAYS get nasty when they are called out?...they ALWAYS start with the name calling....such as Brainiac....or moron, douche' bag, and Dan ALWAYS has a great vocabulary for those who he dislikes.....cracks me up... :yes: ;D
Ya, I noticed. Whats ironic is if we posted something like that about them from WND they would be screaming bloody murder. Guess they're too brain washed to realize screen shots can be altered. :rolleyes:
Quote from: me on December 12, 2009, 02:49:22 PM
Ya, I noticed. Whats ironic is if we posted something like that about them from WND they would be screaming bloody murder. Guess they're too brain washed to realize screen shots can be altered. :rolleyes:
Prove it has been!
Quote from: Henry Hawk on December 12, 2009, 02:42:45 PM
Me, have you noticed how the liberals ALWAYS get nasty when they are called out?...they ALWAYS start with the name calling....such as Brainiac....or moron, douche' bag, and Dan ALWAYS has a great vocabulary for those who he dislikes.....cracks me up... :yes: ;D
I didn't get nasty and I didn't "dick" with anything either, hypocrite. I've also never called you an ass or asked you to kiss mine.
Those holier-than-thou trying to call out the faults of others...always cracks me up! :yes: ;D
Confronted with clear falsehood, Fox News scraps its "zero tolerance" policyQuoteOn November 23, Fishbowl DC published an internal Fox News memo detailing the network's new "zero tolerance" policy for errors. Today -- barely two weeks later -- Fox News attempted to explain why it wasn't going to take any action to correct the following December 4 segment in which three Fox hosts and the Fox News graphics department used a string of falsehoods to turn "59 percent" into "close to 100 percent."
(http://cloudfront.mediamatters.org/static/images/item/fnc-20091204-raspoll.jpg)
What happened? Well, here's the Rasmussen poll Fox & Friends cited. They asked respondents: "In order to support their own theories and beliefs about global warming, how likely is it that some scientists have falsified research data?" According to the poll, 35 percent thought it very likely, 24 percent somewhat likely, 21 percent not very likely, and 5 percent not likely at all (15 percent weren't sure).
Fox News' graphics department added together the "very likely" and "somewhat likely" numbers to reach 59 percent, and called that new group "somewhat likely." Then, for some reason, they threw in the 35 percent "very likely" as their own group, even though they already added that number to the "somewhat likely" percentage. Then they mashed together the "not very likely" and "not likely at all" groups, and threw the 15 percent who were unsure into the waste bin. Voila -- 120 percent.
As such, Fox News' presentation of the data made it seem as though 94 percent of Americans think it's at least "somewhat likely" that climate scientists falsify their research data.
Media Matters (http://mediamatters.org/blog/200912080051)
And now we have Media Matters on the scene.......wow what marvelous examples of journalism. Could we have a case of pot calling kettle black here. You know the accuser is the doer type thing..... :rolleyes:
Here ya go Sandy:
QuoteAmericans Skeptical of Science Behind Global Warming
Thursday, December 03, 2009
Email a Friend Email to a Friend ShareThis
Advertisement
Most Americans (52%) believe that there continues to be significant disagreement within the scientific community over global warming.
While many advocates of aggressive policy responses to global warming say a consensus exists, the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 25% of adults think most scientists agree on the topic. Twenty-three percent (23%) are not sure.
But just in the last few days, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs seemed to reject any such disagreement in a response to a question about global warming, "I don't think ... [global warming] is quite, frankly, among most people, in dispute anymore."
Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Americans say it's at least somewhat likely that some scientists have falsified research data to support their own theories and beliefs about global warming. Thirty-five percent (35%) say it's Very Likely. Just 26% say it's not very or not at all likely that some scientists falsified data.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment_energy/americans_skeptical_of_science_behind_global_warming
Once again, w/amazing speed, in your haste to attempt to prove that Fox couldn't possibly be at fault, you miss the point entirely.
Quote from: Sandy Eggo on December 12, 2009, 03:04:13 PM
I didn't get nasty and I didn't "dick" with anything either, hypocrite. I've also never called you an ass or asked you to kiss mine.
Those holier-than-thou trying to call out the faults of others...always cracks me up! :yes: ;D
why am I a "holier-than-thou".....JUST because I am a Christian?......have I ever shoved my religion on ANYONE on here...?........NO
Here's a lil clue folks; science rarely agrees upon anything until the science proves one theory or another to be the correct one. . . Until then, fux spews network will continue to manipulate the sheeple and their supposed opinions, as will a host of others. It is called propaganda. . .and for a reason. . .