This will no doubt get the ruffled-panties bunch a chance to bash a fine, shy, Christian ( much like myself ) as Ann. Note: they will bash her & not even try to engage the truths found in her article.
( ...all except for Extermaneater, he can't read that much post in one setting, let alone respond )
FORGETTING SARAH PALIN
by Ann Coulter
July 8, 2009
Sarah Palin has deeply disappointed her enemies. People who hate her guts feel she's really let them down by resigning.
She's like the ex-girlfriend they're SO over, never want to see again, have already forgotten about -- really, it's O-ver -- but they just can't stop talking about her.
Liberal: Ha, ha ... Sarah who? She's over, she's toast, a future Trivial Pursuit answer, nothing more.
Normal person: Whatever. How about the North Korean missiles?
Liberal: Can you believe she just resigned the governorship like that? What a quitter!
Normal person: Speaking of quitting, how's work?
Liberal: Did you hear she might get a TV show? There's no way Sarah Palin's getting a TV show! No way! I can't believe stupid Sarah Palin could get her own stupid TV show now. Well, I'm sure not gonna watch it -- that's for sure!
Normal person: Have you seen all the Michael Jackson coverage on TV?
Liberal: How does she think she can run for president in 2012 if she can't finish her term as governor of a Podunk state? She's finished.
Normal person: OK, then! You won't have to vote for her.
Liberal: I was never going to vote for her! But now I'm not going to vote for her twice. And I will never watch her TV show. I am so over her.
Reporters had already written their stories on Palin's press conference -- "rambling!" "incoherent!" -- before she even stepped to the podium.
Whatever you think of Palin, her argument for resigning was the opposite of "rambling" and "incoherent."
Palin's basketball analogy couldn't have been clearer, even to prissy liberal pundits who get uncomfortable when the subject turns to sports: She decided to destroy the other team's game plan, which has been to obsessively focus on her, by resigning.
This is particularly apt here -- she's passing the ball to a fantastic right-wing lieutenant governor, who shares her principles but doesn't set off the left's neuroses.
This is better for him, better for the state, better for the conservative program and better for Palin personally, whose family is sick of all the crap. Now she can make a lot of money and promote conservatism on a national stage.
It certainly won't be held against Palin by people who don't already loathe her. (On the other hand, her approval ratings among people who think she's worse than Hitler are down to 48 percent.)
With the left frenetically filing ethics complaint after ethics complaint against Palin, costing her state millions of dollars and her personally half a million dollars, citizens of Alaska must be asking, "Can we please have our state back?"
But to read the news reports -- which actually were rambling and incoherent -- you would think Palin was speaking in tongues.
The truth is liberals are furious they won't have Sarah Palin to kick around anymore -- at least not with Palin's hands tied behind her back by her public office.
Something tells me Keith Olbermann isn't going to be pulling any big numbers this summer attacking Eric Cantor and Michele Bachmann. I don't anticipate any sudden outbreaks of "Mitch McConnell Derangement Syndrome."
Soon we'll only hear about Keith when his creepy e-mails using his mother's death to hit on chicks start making the rounds again. (Tip to Keith: When a girl refuses to give you her phone number, her assistant's phone number or her personal e-mail address, and only gives you her assistant's e-mail address, you're not halfway in the sack.)
Bonus: If Olbermann gets canceled as a result of Palin's resignation, that will put her in a really good position for 2012.
But instead of being honest and saying, "Oh well, it was a good ride while it lasted," liberal chatterers indignantly demand: "Is this not the greatest betrayal a public servant ever committed against the people?"
On one hand, liberals are enraged at the heinousness of Mark Sanford -- whom they didn't vote for -- for not resigning and, on the other, they're enraged at Palin -- whom they also didn't vote for -- for resigning.
The peculiarly venomous hatred of Palin is driven by women of the left and their whipped consorts. All that needs to happen is for a feminist to overhear two Nation readers saying, "I hate to admit it, but Palin is kind of hot" and ...
WHAT??????????? YOU CALL THAT HOT? I'LL HAVE YOU KNOW WE'VE GOT A MEGA-SUPER HOTTIE IN DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ. AND NEED I REMIND YOU AGAIN OF THE RAW SEX APPEAL OF RACHEL MADDOW?
Democrats are a party of women, and nothing drives them off their gourds like a beautiful Christian conservative. (How much money has that other beautiful born-again, Carrie Prejean, been forced to spend on lawyers to respond to liberal hysteria?)
So the motives are clear, but the money is not. Who is paying the rent for the losers filing all these frivolous complaints against Palin?
At least when Richard Mellon Scaife was funding investigations of Bill Clinton, we knew who Scaife was, he was an American citizen, and his money was accessible to U.S. tax authorities and not stashed in offshore accounts like a certain Hungarian Nazi-collaborator I can name.
How about some modern-day Scaife investigate the investigators?
COPYRIGHT 2009 ANN COULTER
DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL PRESS SYNDICATE
1130 Walnut, Kansas City, MO 64106
Quote from: Philodox on July 13, 2009, 10:48:19 AM
( ...all except for Extermaneater, he can't read that much post in one setting, let alone respond )
Sure he can, Scump; he just couldn't care less what one white trash skank has to say about another. I can see why women like these might appeal to your NASCAR mentality though.
I for one would love to forget about this attention whore, but the media sluts just won't let it die; and the attention whore is just as much to blame as the media.
She needs to just STFU and go away. Go skin a moose. make some muckluks, or wrestle a bear. . . or anything else besides getting up in front of a bank of cameras and whinnying. . . :rolleyes:
She wants the solitude and privacy of a frontier state, and now she has it if she'll just sew her mouth shut for a few months. . .
Same thing goes for that mouth COULTER. . . :rolleyes:
Quote from: Palehorse on July 13, 2009, 11:53:52 AM
I for one would love to forget about this attention whore, but the media sluts just won't let it die; and the attention whore is just as much to blame as the media.
She needs to just STFU and go away. Go skin a moose. make some muckluks, or wrestle a bear. . . or anything else besides get up in front of a bank of cameras and whinnying. . . :rolleyes:
She wants the solitude and privacy of a frontier state, and now she has it if she'll just sew her mouth shut for a few months. . .
Same thing goes for that mouth COULTER. . . :rolleyes:
I will trade you ONE Ann Coulter for ONE Nancy Pelosi... ;) :razz:
Quote from: Henry Hawk on July 13, 2009, 11:55:31 AM
I will trade you ONE Ann Coulter for ONE Nancy Pelosi... ;) :razz:
What, trade one mouth for another? Better to super-glue their mouths shut and fingers together! Let them each mime their way to obscurity!
Or better yet, after the gluing session lets fill a pool with jello and toss them into it together! :biggrin:
Quote from: Palehorse on July 13, 2009, 11:59:44 AM
What, trade one mouth for another? Better to super-glue their mouths shut and fingers together! Let them each mime their way to obscurity!
Or better yet, after the gluing session lets fill a pool with jello and toss them into it together! :biggrin:
That works for me.... ;D
Quote from: Exterminator on July 13, 2009, 11:17:05 AM
Sure he can, Scump; he just couldn't care less what one white trash skank has to say about another. I can see why women like these might appeal to your NASCAR mentality though.
________________________________________________________________________
Which all that means is I was right in the first place, you didn't ( or couldn't ) read the whole post. lol
.
Quote from: Philodox on July 13, 2009, 01:30:13 PM
Which all that means is I was right in the first place, you didn't ( or couldn't ) read the whole post. lol
Correct; if I want to see the language abused and read the thoughts of the sub-100 IQ crowd, I have your posts to keep me busy.
Quote from: Exterminator on July 14, 2009, 07:21:10 AM
Correct; if I want to see the language abused and read the thoughts of the sub-100 IQ crowd, I have your posts to keep me busy.
____________________________________________________________________
Don't kid yourself...A coloring book would keep you busy. lol
Quote from: Philodox on July 14, 2009, 07:32:35 AM
Don't kid yourself...A coloring book would keep you busy. lol
There's that striking wit again!