http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/24/report-south-carolina-governor-traveled-argentina-appalachian-trail/
:rolleyes:
And your point is?
Yep! Somebody's gonna be oinkin from the boinkin! :biggrin:
(And it ain't his wife!)
Quote from: me on June 24, 2009, 03:58:40 PM
And your point is?
My point is that Republicans talk a good talk, but thats about it. When its time to actually deliver on ANYTHING they supposedly stand for, they come up woefully wanting.
Statement from First Lady Jenny Sanford
I would like to start by saying I love my husband and I believe I have put forth every effort possible to be the best wife I can be during our almost twenty years of marriage. As well, for the last fifteen years my husband has been fully engaged in public service to the citizens and taxpayers of this state and I have faithfully supported him in those efforts to the best of my ability. I have been and remain proud of his accomplishments and his service to this state.
I personally believe that the greatest legacy I will leave behind in this world is not the job I held on Wall Street, or the campaigns I managed for Mark, or the work I have done as First Lady or even the philanthropic activities in which I have been routinely engaged. Instead, the greatest legacy I will leave in this world is the character of the children I, or we, leave behind. It is for that reason that I deeply regret the recent actions of my husband Mark, and their potential damage to our children.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/ (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/)
Momma gots her war paint on and she sure is oinkin! :biggrin: Daddy ain't gettin no boinkin! :biggrin:
is this a political lady whose gonna grow a set and toss her cheatin man out on his ear??
Quote from: Gryphon on June 24, 2009, 05:53:14 PM
is this a political lady whose gonna grow a set and toss her cheatin man out on his ear??
I'm betting his stuff's out on the front lawn right now! :biggrin:
His career is toast, and burnt toast at that, and the only way she's getting funded for her future is by tossing the rascal out on his 6! I bet the ink is already dry on the paperwork!
Daddy's running to his mistress in Argentina since he lost his job. . . Momma needs funding!
I have heard that there is a law in SC that you can take your wife to the county courthouse on the first Saturday of each month and legally beat them. I wonder if that law goes the other way too? :biggrin:
South Carolina Code
SECTION 16-15-60. Adultery or fornication.
Any man or woman who shall be guilty of the crime of adultery or fornication shall be liable to indictment and, on conviction, shall be severally punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than five hundred dollars or imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than one year or by both fine and imprisonment, at the discretion of the court.
SECTION 16-15-70. "Adultery" defined.
"Adultery" is the living together and carnal intercourse with each other or habitual carnal intercourse with each other without living together of a man and woman when either is lawfully married to some other person.
http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t16c015.htm
:eek:
I like the public beating better myself!! Maybe we should bring back the stockade!! Why should he get to hid in a jail cell and privately deal with his embarrassing predicament? Scarlet Letter him!!! :biggrin:
LMAO!! :yes: :biggrin:
Actually, I was just reading that link and you can get the same penalty for fornication in SC. ;D
Those fine legislators in SC don't like no aduterin', no fornicatin', and no prostitutin' in their fine state so much so that they codified it. :rotfl:
Well I can be guilty of a misdemeanor here in good ole North Cackalacky if I co-habitate with someone of the opposite sex!! I have been known to live dangerously on the wild side you know! :razz:
Well that's whatcha' get for living in Cackalacky. :razz: :biggrin:
Quote from: Locutus on June 24, 2009, 06:10:56 PM
South Carolina Code
SECTION 16-15-60. Adultery or fornication.
Any man or woman who shall be guilty of the crime of adultery or fornication shall be liable to indictment and, on conviction, shall be severally punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars nor more than five hundred dollars or imprisonment for not less than six months nor more than one year or by both fine and imprisonment, at the discretion of the court.
SECTION 16-15-70. "Adultery" defined.
"Adultery" is the living together and carnal intercourse with each other or habitual carnal intercourse with each other without living together of a man and woman when either is lawfully married to some other person.
http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t16c015.htm
:eek:
Guess I'd have been a guest of the state in my younger days! :spooked: Once anyway. . . :angel:
Wonder if the good gubna now regrets voting to impeach Clinton when he was in Congress?
Their statements are bullshit. How can you be working on your marriage/goin' to counseling/etc. when the bastard was there THIS WEEK boinking his mistress??
Claps to the first lady though for tossin' him out two weeks ago. Im thinking Pale is right, they's headed for a dee-vorce.
It stinks when those stones you cast get thrown back at you eventually! :yes:
LMAO!! And if Fair & Balanced doesn't work for you, simply distort and hope nobody notices. From Fox New's coverage today:
(http://i44.tinypic.com/8vpy68.png)
Link (http://www.newshounds.us/2009/06/24/whoops_they_did_it_again_fox_news_identifies_mark_sanford_as_a_democrat.php)
And before any of you claim this is an isolated incident, they did the same with Mark Foley. Yep, a "D" where the "R" should be.
It would be funny if it weren't so dangerous and so many simpletons didn't believe everything that this network reports as the gospel. :no:
Quote from: Locutus on June 24, 2009, 06:10:56 PM
SECTION 16-15-70. "Adultery" defined.
"Adultery" is the living together and carnal intercourse with each other or habitual carnal intercourse with each other without living together of a man and woman when either is lawfully married to some other person.
So one night stands are cool...sweet! :biggrin:
does that mean that if the intercourse isnt carnal, it doesnt count?
Quote from: Locutus on June 24, 2009, 11:29:56 PM
And before any of you claim this is an isolated incident, they did the same with Mark Foley. Yep, a "D" where the "R" should be.
It would be funny if it weren't so dangerous and so many simpletons didn't believe everything that this network reports as the gospel.
I'm curious, Locutus. Do you believe the gospels or
more factual or less factual than Faux News? I think it's a pretty close race. :wink:
Quote from: Elaine on June 25, 2009, 07:50:04 AM
does that mean that if the intercourse isnt carnal, it doesnt count?
Hmmm... Vegetarian intercourse. Sounds interesting. After you get past the cucumbers and zucchini, of course.
Quote from: LOsborne on June 25, 2009, 07:55:15 AM
Hmmm... Vegetarian intercourse. Sounds interesting. After you get past the cucumbers and zucchini, of course.
Jalapeno's anyone? :devil29:
Hey lady! What are you doing with that watermelon?! :spooked:
Quote from: Locutus on June 24, 2009, 11:29:56 PM
LMAO!! And if Fair & Balanced doesn't work for you, simply distort and hope nobody notices. From Fox New's coverage today:
(http://i44.tinypic.com/8vpy68.png)
Link (http://www.newshounds.us/2009/06/24/whoops_they_did_it_again_fox_news_identifies_mark_sanford_as_a_democrat.php)
And before any of you claim this is an isolated incident, they did the same with Mark Foley. Yep, a "D" where the "R" should be.
It would be funny if it weren't so dangerous and so many simpletons didn't believe everything that this network reports as the gospel. :no:
Are we shocked by this? Not really!!
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/24/south.carolina.governor.emails/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/24/south.carolina.governor.emails/index.html)
Above story has partial contents of "steamy" e-mails between the former gubnah and his pony ride. . . :rolleyes:
You Harlequin fans should enjoy them. . .
Who writes crap like this?
"I could digress and say that you have the ability to give magnificent gentle kisses, or that I love your tan lines or that I love the curve of your hips, the erotic beauty of you holding yourself (or two magnificent parts of yourself) in the faded glow of the night's light -- but hey, that would be going into sexual details ..."
:biggrin:
A man obsessed with fun bags I'd say! :biggrin:
Quote from: kimmi on June 25, 2009, 08:39:16 AM
Who writes crap like this?
I do and how did you get ahold of Mrs. Sanford's email account? 8)
Quote from: Locutus on June 24, 2009, 11:29:56 PM
LMAO!! And if Fair & Balanced doesn't work for you, simply distort and hope nobody notices. From Fox New's coverage today:
(http://i44.tinypic.com/8vpy68.png)
Link (http://www.newshounds.us/2009/06/24/whoops_they_did_it_again_fox_news_identifies_mark_sanford_as_a_democrat.php)
And before any of you claim this is an isolated incident, they did the same with Mark Foley. Yep, a "D" where the "R" should be.
It would be funny if it weren't so dangerous and so many simpletons didn't believe everything that this network reports as the gospel. :no:
Typical!
jfk
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 25, 2009, 12:40:01 PM
jfk
Nice attempt to deflect with ancient history. :rolleyes:
Quote from: Exterminator on June 25, 2009, 07:37:21 AM
So one night stands are cool...sweet! :biggrin:
:yes: :biggrin:
Quote from: kimmi on June 25, 2009, 08:15:47 AM
Are we shocked by this? Not really!!
We shouldn't be, and I notice that none of the typical Faux News defenders are saying much about it.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 25, 2009, 12:40:01 PM
jfk
JFK didn't vote to impeach anyone.
Sanford is simply a lying, hypocrite, holier-than-thou adulterer who is now crying crocodile tears.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 25, 2009, 12:40:01 PM
jfk
Pitiful Henry, just pitiful.
His lady friend aint hard on the eyes:
(http://thevinylvillage.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/maria-belen-shapur-2.jpg?w=186&h=276)
Quote from: Exterminator on June 25, 2009, 01:10:44 PM
Nice attempt to deflect with ancient history. :rolleyes:
just pointing out, he was the politician who originated the 'art' of sneaking out on his wife.....to meet another woman.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 26, 2009, 07:15:51 AM
just pointing out, he was the politician who originated the 'art' of sneaking out on his wife.....to meet another woman.
Nope. Jackson was quite fond of doing so as well. . .
Quote from: Palehorse on June 26, 2009, 07:21:50 AM
Nope. Jackson was quite fond of doing so as well. . .
And I believe he has the descendants to prove it. :eek:
Quote from: pariann on June 26, 2009, 07:28:04 AM
And I believe he has the descendants to prove it. :eek:
:yes: :biggrin:
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 26, 2009, 07:15:51 AM
just pointing out, he was the politician who originated the 'art' of sneaking out on his wife.....to meet another woman.
Some years back my friends and I were making lists of all the presidents who got a little something on the side. We realized it would be easier to make a list of those who didn't. We came up with one name: Richard Nixon. ... until one of the guys pointed out we were forgetting Bebe Rebozo.
Quote from: Palehorse on June 26, 2009, 07:21:50 AM
Nope. Jackson was quite fond of doing so as well. . .
but he didn't have the paparazzi (sp?) to deal with, like these days....
but, yeah, he did like to get around......and pari, makes a pretty good point too...
Quote from: LOsborne on June 26, 2009, 07:47:05 AM
Some years back my friends and I were making lists of all the presidents who got a little something on the side. We realized it would be easier to make a list of those who didn't. We came up with one name: Richard Nixon. ... until one of the guys pointed out we were forgetting Bebe Rebozo.
Did Jimmy Carter get a little on the side?
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 26, 2009, 07:47:26 AM
but he didn't have the paparazzi (sp?) to deal with, like these days....
but, yeah, he did like to get around......and pari, makes a pretty good point too...
When he heard "go out and spread the seed", he took his task seriously. LOL
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 26, 2009, 07:49:06 AM
Did Jimmy Carter get a little on the side?
Maybe not, but isn't he the one that openly admitted he had "lusted in his heart"? Apparently he had been mentally unfaithful.
Quote from: pariann on June 26, 2009, 07:54:18 AM
Maybe not, but isn't he the one that openly admitted he had "lusted in his heart"?
Hasn't everyone?
I hit some button on my keyboard and that posted before I was finished. I had another sentence to add.
And no...not everyone. I don't feel lust in my heart EVER. Trust me, that is not where the feeling lies.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 26, 2009, 07:47:26 AM
but he didn't have the paparazzi (sp?) to deal with, like these days....
but, yeah, he did like to get around......and pari, makes a pretty good point too...
Not true either. Jackson's wandering eye (yeah the third one) was quite the fodder for Washington's gossip mongers in the press. They just didn't come right out with it but rather, "beat around the bush". . . Why do you think he was so fond of dueling?
Quote from: pariann on June 26, 2009, 07:57:05 AM
And no...not everyone. I don't feel lust in my heart EVER. Trust me, that is not where the feeling lies.
Lower? :biggrin:
Quote from: Exterminator on June 26, 2009, 08:57:07 AM
Lower? :biggrin:
:biggrin:
Loin cloth anyone? :biggrin:
Quote from: Exterminator on June 26, 2009, 08:57:07 AM
Lower? :biggrin:
I'll have to check my memory archives. It's been way too long since I've even thought about it.
Quote from: Henry Hawk on June 26, 2009, 07:15:51 AM
just pointing out, he was the politician who originated the 'art' of sneaking out on his wife.....to meet another woman.
But ... did JFK stand on the pulpit and tell us all how immoral we were if we did such a thing?
Quote from: Bo D on June 26, 2009, 09:41:27 AM
But ... did JFK stand on the pulpit and tell us all how immoral we were if we did such a thing?
Hypocrisy is lost on Henry.
Quote from: Exterminator on June 26, 2009, 09:47:57 AM
Hypocrisy is lost on Henry.
No, I don't really think it is. He just would rather forget things which are contrary to his beliefs rather than confront the truth.
Quote from: Bo D on June 26, 2009, 09:55:45 AM
No, I don't really think it is. He just would rather forget things which are contrary to his beliefs rather than confront the truth.
Isn't that sort of the definition?
Clinton and other slimy Dems are just as bad.
I believe that ship has sailed.
Quote from: Gardengirl on June 27, 2009, 12:42:36 PM
Clinton and other slimy Dems are just as bad.
My, my.
Aren't we the brilliant political observer.
And from such an unexpected source.
Clinton never voted to impeach anyone else.
But, your acerbic wit has withered all those who dare to question your poignant commentary.
I am seriously beginning to think 99% of all men are lying scum whose brains are located somewhere between their waist and their knees. ;D
It's ridiculous the argument that Republicans are hypocrites because they preach morality and then fail themselves. It's better to at least try to set moral standards for yourself than to not even try, and that's what a lot of Dems do. They don't even pretend to be moral.
Quote from: Gardengirl on June 28, 2009, 12:35:23 AM
It's ridiculous the argument that Republicans are hypocrites because they preach morality and then fail themselves. It's better to at least try to set moral standards for yourself than to not even try, and that's what a lot of Dems do. They don't even pretend to be moral.
Read the definition of hypocrite.
Then edit your statement so you don't look so illiterate.
Quote from: Gardengirl on June 28, 2009, 12:35:23 AM
It's ridiculous the argument that Republicans are hypocrites because they preach morality and then fail themselves....
Not practicing what you preach is the definition of hypocrisy, sugar, as FTW points out. You would probably have better luck being taken seriously if you would look the words up before you use them. Maybe Santa will bring you a dictionary this year.
(http://images2.cafepress.com/product/395080252v3_350x350_Front_Color-White.jpg)
That's hilarious Dan. :rotfl: